Author Topic: Lightcarbon: New LCR017-D (or Yishun R1058-D)  (Read 120787 times)

JimLee

Re: Lightcarbon: New LCR017-D (or Yishun R1058-D)
« Reply #30 on: September 06, 2023, 02:31:52 AM »
Now our LCR017-D only size 54cm passed the test, other size maybe will a little change, now only on design,
have two version, supper light version for rider under 100kgs, norma weight for rider under 120kgs,
some photos on google photos,

https://photos.app.goo.gl/6fnizD7PMyFJ591u8

JimLee

Re: Lightcarbon: New LCR017-D (or Yishun R1058-D)
« Reply #31 on: September 06, 2023, 02:40:09 AM »
I think the geo chart for the LCR017-D is still shaking out. I took the geo chart from this (reseller?) https://jmcarbonframe.nl/frames-race/

And it looks like either the fork rake (unclear if that is what is in the second WB column) or the trail are incorrect.

If they had a 50mm or 55mm fork available for smaller sizes and this bike could take 35mm tires it would be interesting and pushing the envelope a bit, but 32mm is still very much on trend.
The second WB is the fork rake/ offset, 45mm

JimLee

Re: Lightcarbon: New LCR017-D (or Yishun R1058-D)
« Reply #32 on: September 06, 2023, 04:33:57 AM »
The seat tube, seat stays and seat post look so different in these photo compared to the ones on your Facebook page.

Doesn't look like the same frame...
The seat tube has been changed because the original seat post can not support strong enough.
The length between top tube and down tube is different because the sizes,
the frame in the Eurobike is only sample,
The production frame has some minor modifications, such as the shape of the top tube.
In addition, the angle of taking pictures will also cause the results to look different

PLA

Re: Lightcarbon: New LCR017-D (or Yishun R1058-D)
« Reply #33 on: September 06, 2023, 05:02:43 AM »
The seat tube has been changed because the original seat post can not support strong enough.
The length between top tube and down tube is different because the sizes,
the frame in the Eurobike is only sample,
The production frame has some minor modifications, such as the shape of the top tube.
In addition, the angle of taking pictures will also cause the results to look different

Fair. Sounds good, Jim.
It’s so clearly a LARP of an aero bike.

Dark17

Re: Lightcarbon: New LCR017-D (or Yishun R1058-D)
« Reply #34 on: September 06, 2023, 05:26:54 AM »
The seat tube has been changed because the original seat post can not support strong enough.
The length between top tube and down tube is different because the sizes,
the frame in the Eurobike is only sample,
The production frame has some minor modifications, such as the shape of the top tube.
In addition, the angle of taking pictures will also cause the results to look different

is size 54 available now for distribution?
rematistang jempoy (sprinter fred) from The Philippines

jfcb

Re: Lightcarbon: New LCR017-D (or Yishun R1058-D)
« Reply #35 on: September 06, 2023, 06:25:55 AM »
wow, that's aesthetically a completely different bike.  A shame, since I liked the original design (apart from the super thin junction at the bottom bracket).

Dark17

Re: Lightcarbon: New LCR017-D (or Yishun R1058-D)
« Reply #36 on: September 06, 2023, 07:41:24 AM »
yah, it's pretty much like Lab71 on the first design. Maybe they don't want some legal action from cannondale on copying Lab71's design
rematistang jempoy (sprinter fred) from The Philippines

PLA

Re: Lightcarbon: New LCR017-D (or Yishun R1058-D)
« Reply #37 on: September 06, 2023, 08:27:42 AM »
yeah now it looks so generic and .. hate to say it .. ugly =\
« Last Edit: October 07, 2023, 09:13:46 AM by PLA »
It’s so clearly a LARP of an aero bike.

neobiker

Re: Lightcarbon: New LCR017-D (or Yishun R1058-D)
« Reply #38 on: September 06, 2023, 02:31:39 PM »
Agreed, the frame is way less appealing than the prototype. I would prefer the LCR0X in term of design.


JimLee

Re: Lightcarbon: New LCR017-D (or Yishun R1058-D)
« Reply #39 on: September 07, 2023, 01:45:42 AM »
is size 54 available now for distribution?
size 54cm normal weight 1050g, loading time about 40-50 days after payment,
supper light version 950g need about 70 days,

JimLee

Re: Lightcarbon: New LCR017-D (or Yishun R1058-D)
« Reply #40 on: September 07, 2023, 01:50:13 AM »
Agreed, the frame is way less appealing than the prototype. I would prefer the LCR0X in term of design.
the frame LCROX-D have too many bike brands and bike shops use it add their brand, it's a classic aero frame,
we need a new frame for long distance, More relaxed and non-aggressive geometry.

neobiker

Re: Lightcarbon: New LCR017-D (or Yishun R1058-D)
« Reply #41 on: September 07, 2023, 07:35:51 AM »
the frame LCROX-D have too many bike brands and bike shops use it add their brand, it's a classic aero frame,
we need a new frame for long distance, More relaxed and non-aggressive geometry.

Agreed, but you could have made an endurance bike that looks aero, with an endurance geometry.

Something like the LCR0X but with different seat tube angles would have been amazing or something like the Yishun R068-D which looks like a Venge with a more relaxed geometry.

Or something that looks like the new Pinarello X Series

raisinberry777

Re: Lightcarbon: New LCR017-D (or Yishun R1058-D)
« Reply #42 on: September 07, 2023, 07:42:55 AM »
I actually prefer the production version - the lines look more proportional. Much like a Merida Scultura but with a threaded BB. Could be my next bike!

Dark17

Re: Lightcarbon: New LCR017-D (or Yishun R1058-D)
« Reply #43 on: September 07, 2023, 08:13:05 AM »
I actually prefer the production version - the lines look more proportional. Much like a Merida Scultura but with a threaded BB. Could be my next bike!

Yeah I agree, it looks like a Merida Scultura. It now comes to my mind that Lab71 is not a really good design and we might see some videos from Hambini roasting that frame lol.
rematistang jempoy (sprinter fred) from The Philippines

neobiker

Re: Lightcarbon: New LCR017-D (or Yishun R1058-D)
« Reply #44 on: September 07, 2023, 08:25:11 AM »
I wonder if you can ask to swap fork and wonder if that would be compatible, I prefer the one from the LCR0X.