Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - ChinaCruz

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
31
29+ & 27+ / Re: 2019 27.5 Boost Plus Dual Suspension
« on: July 06, 2019, 09:46:36 AM »
So, what travel, geo, and linkage type are you looking for?

32
29+ & 27+ / Re: Light Carbon FS713 build planning
« on: July 06, 2019, 09:45:12 AM »
Nice build, Dodo. That McLeod is a great shock and it is customizable if you don't like the stock tune.

33
29+ & 27+ / Re: M06 27.5+ build April 2019 (updated with pics)
« on: July 06, 2019, 09:30:53 AM »
Going on two months of riding and loving this bike.

I don't need the offset bushing with 2.6" tires, but I do use it with 2.3" tires, which are Vittoria Morsa. As for handling, it seems that tire profile is the major factor here.

The final thing it needs is a remote for the shock lever. Antisquat isn't too high, I'd estimate around 90%, so for long climbs I put it on setting 2 of four, if setting 1 is locked out and 4 is open. I'm thinking of adapting my 2x shifter for this and using a cable splitter to do both the fork and shock at the same time.

If anyone has the antisquat and leverage ratio charts for this bike, I'm interested in seeing them.

Final build price came in at $2700USD. Obviously I got some deals. On some other things I paid almost retail, like the rotors and tires. $1200 for the frame, shock, and fork seems like a pretty good bang for the buck.

What do you guys think?


34
29+ & 27+ / Re: 2019 27.5 Boost Plus Dual Suspension
« on: July 02, 2019, 09:06:15 AM »
I'm impressed with their photos and measurements - maybe the most informed seller yet. It has the usual wonkiness of a chiner frame - enduro xc bike with 110mm of travel and a fd, very quaint. But the geo numbers are a turn off, I'd like 630mm ett in a 19". With the slack seat angle and short reach, you're going to put a setback post which will slacken it even further. Maybe good for flat terrain but steep ups are going to be awkward with your butt over the rear axle!

35
29+ & 27+ / Re: Light Carbon FS713 build planning
« on: July 02, 2019, 08:57:37 AM »
To me this pretty much looks like they dont know what they are selling.

Just smile and wave, bro. This is all part of the exciting experience of riding chiner frames! The seller for my M06 published the wrong atc, no shock mounting info, and no geo chart for anything other than the 19". It is laughable how clueless they are. And we ride these things? We must be insane.

36
29er / Re: Newbie Build Carbomania
« on: May 22, 2019, 11:19:25 PM »
Geo chart says 506mm atc fork. You bought a 140mm fork, that's like 545mm atc.

37
I got one of the gloss black frames. It has no soul. Where can I get something like this and how much?


38
29+ & 27+ / Re: Light Carbon FS713 build planning
« on: May 18, 2019, 12:52:45 PM »
Ok but you can get blue decals for most forks. Might want to check out the Bike Radar fork review. I just don't want you to spend that much money when you can get good fork for half that.

As well as the Manitou Mcleod for the rear shock.

39
29+ & 27+ / Re: Light Carbon FS713 build planning
« on: May 13, 2019, 12:33:48 PM »
I don't see any incompatibility problems with those components except I am unsure about the headset.

If you plan to do heavy technical riding, I think you would appreciate the function of a heavier duty shock. Something with a reservoir like a DPX2.

Do you like DT suspension?

40
29+ & 27+ / Re: M06 27.5+ build April 2019 (updated with pics)
« on: May 13, 2019, 12:18:34 PM »
The 130mm fork and single offset bushing raised the bb by 12.5mm. I can't feel a change in handling but pedal strikes have been reduced significantly. The bars are also in a better position so I don't need to use stem spacers.

For 27.5 2.6 tires, I think it is safe to say that 525mm is a good fork atc, making this a 110/130 bike.

Other pertinent info: Tires are 65mm width, 170mm cranks, 25% sag fork and shock.

41
29+ & 27+ / Re: TanTan FM08
« on: May 08, 2019, 10:57:25 PM »
I cannot recall seeing an e-type derailleur mount stuck into a linkage arm like that. It is an interesting frame. I'd like to see some kinematics charts

42
29+ & 27+ / Re: M06 27.5+ build April 2019 (updated with pics)
« on: May 08, 2019, 05:08:15 PM »
Thanks!

I took of the 32SC and put on a 34 130mm. It added exactly 1 lb to the bike. Yowza. But it's wet here and I won't be able to ride it for a while.

43
29+ & 27+ / Re: M06 27.5+ build April 2019 (updated with pics)
« on: April 18, 2019, 09:16:59 AM »
I have a Shimano SM-AX76-B axle but it is just slightly too long for the nut to tighten down. I will get a washer for it. Then I can use the cam action of the lever to tighten. These axles are pretty cheap to buy.

The more I ride it, the more I am convinced this was a good choice. Also the geo chart should for certain say the fork atc should be 520mm not 500mm - both for reasons of pedal clearance and the short head tube.

44
29er / Re: 185x55 shock on a 190x45 frame possible?
« on: April 14, 2019, 10:34:26 PM »
You might be able to stack bottom out spacers in the shock and make it a 185x45. Then it would be only 5mm deeper in the travel.

45
29+ & 27+ / Re: M06 27.5+ build April 2019
« on: April 14, 2019, 06:57:30 PM »
Emu, that makes sense. As long as it stays together I shouldn't complain!

Got it together and went for a ride. It came out to 24lb with pedals. I could lose a pound with weenie tires and another pound with better crank/cassette/saddle/pedals.

I'm 6' and got the 19", which is a perfect fit. I have 125 psi in the Mcleod for about 28% sag.

It worked well and was fun to ride.



Syntace hubs, don't see that every day.  ;D



The RWC bearings feel smooth. Buuuuut, I have a standard Rockshox mount kit on the other end. When I unbolt the RWC end and move the shock, it feels just as smooth as when I do the same action on the RWC bearings. So was it worth $44? No idea.



Build list, kind of a mix of Shimano 11 speed.



It would be better with a 120mm fork. With this 100mm fork, I have a taller dust cover and a -6 degree stem. I usually slam the stem and use a -17. When a good deal comes along I will get one, but it will have to be a Fox 34 SC I think. I do not like the stiction of the Rockshox forks. I know a Reba is under $300 but I'll pass.

Thoughts on the frame -

Bad:

cable routing,
Rear axle nut is smooth. Frame carbon is smooth. Rear axle nut spins when you try to tighten axle.
Lack of a front derailleur mount. This is laziness because a 2x system will fit.
Bottle cage mounts too high. There is no excuse for this really.

Good:

Geo is pretty good if you like an aggressive riding position. They messed up on some parts of the geo chart but nothing bad.
Tire clearance is very good. I have plenty of space around the 2.6" Barzo tires, which are 2.6" measured.
The BB92 had a good interference fit. I used Loctite 609 on a Wheels Manuf thread together bb unit. This worked really well.
All linkage bearings fit tightly, were well lubed, well sealed, and torqued properly. Of course I took it all apart to come by this information, but if I had left it alone it would have been ok.
The flex stay design appears well executed.
Shock mounts were almost perfect. I had to use a 0.5mm shim on the rear mount but that was cheap from RWC.
Headset and seatpost clamp all took standard sized components without a problem.
Rear axle fit (I mean the dimensions of the nds hole relative to the axle outer diameter) was perfect.
One of the brake mount threads was tight, but I didnt clean it. Probably should blast some air in there before building.
Dropper routing is pretty good.
Frame and shock were $800 total. Good price.

Neutral:

BB is a bit low with the 2.6" tires, even with 170mm cranks. Perhaps this could benefit from one of those off center shock mounts. I calculated a single offset bushing would raise the rear axle 4.3mm. With a 120mm fork it will also be higher. The issue here is that a lot of nice 120mm forks are coming out this year so I'm going to hold off buying for now.

Overall, am I satisfied with this frame? Mostly, yes.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4