1
29er / Re: Design flaw/quality issue IP-036
« on: June 12, 2017, 07:26:02 AM »
Did you find a place to get new bushing bolts? I snapped the head off the small screw on mine. Peter says they don't have them anymore.
Chinese Carbon MTB Forums
News:
Happy Holidays!
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
29er / Re: IP-036 29er Full Suspension Carbon Frame Build
« on: October 12, 2015, 03:02:53 PM »
Any upside or downside for flipping the rear shock?
3
29er / Re: IP - 036 questions by Gabby
« on: October 03, 2015, 01:59:31 PM »
What was the outcome? Did you get a washer? Reduce the play in the rear end
4
29er / Re: Bearing Spacing?
« on: July 11, 2015, 09:40:58 PM »
I can't say I have noticed it riding but because of the O57 rear thru axle coming loose before I am constantly checking the 036 if there is play in the rear end. I can hear the movement and see it in the rear disk brake as it moves side to side in the caliper.
I guess some movement is to be expected, I just was concerned and wondered if there was any solution to fix it IE new pivot bearings like I did for the rear shock.
I guess some movement is to be expected, I just was concerned and wondered if there was any solution to fix it IE new pivot bearings like I did for the rear shock.
5
29er / Re: Time to Build Another One - IP-036 (completed on page 2)
« on: July 11, 2015, 09:08:51 PM »
Wow. That is great! Mine didn't last half that. I replaced it and we are back to normal. I have two bikes with the same setup so it's easy to notice differences. I have also noticed some wearing on the cassette. I have a spare wheel setup so I just switched it.
6
29er / Re: Bearing Spacing?
« on: July 11, 2015, 08:52:39 PM »
Sorry to restart and old thread but this is what I am noticing. There is play in the rear about 1mm. It is only detectable if you put the rear tire on the ground and grab it and move it side to side. If the bike is the air and you grab the tire and move it side to side. There is NO play.
Where and what pivot mount bushings did everyone get? I have RWC for the rear shock.
Where and what pivot mount bushings did everyone get? I have RWC for the rear shock.
7
29er / Re: Time to Build Another One - IP-036 (completed on page 2)
« on: July 05, 2015, 11:00:04 AM »
Update: I was trying to figure out why I was getting so much grinding in the gears. I took a part the bottom bracket. Replaced the chain and nothing. Figured it out, it was the front chain ring. XX1 Chain Rings only lasted around 1500 miles I suspect.
I prefer my Ip-036 on most everything I ride around here. I still race with both of them but unless it smooth singletrack I am on the FS.
I prefer my Ip-036 on most everything I ride around here. I still race with both of them but unless it smooth singletrack I am on the FS.
8
29er / Re: Carbon Speed Grand Opening Giveaway - Win a FREE Set of Carbon Rims!
« on: May 30, 2015, 04:22:13 PM »
Enter
9
29er / Re: Time to Build Another One - IP-036 (completed on page 2)
« on: March 23, 2015, 06:52:19 PM »
awesome. thank you guys. For those looking for them - 4mm is what was referenced above
10
29er / Re: Time to Build Another One - IP-036 (completed on page 2)
« on: March 18, 2015, 06:26:11 PM »
Yeah, he replied to my email asking him about this on his new email.
11
29er / Re: Time to Build Another One - IP-036 (completed on page 2)
« on: March 16, 2015, 06:46:40 PM »
So after a trip to the bike store after I couldn't figure out why the Ip057 frame had inserts for the brakeline etc and the ip036 didn't, I am back to the drawing board. I need to find frame inserts for the running of the cables. I'd email Peter but I think he changed jobs.
So anyone has reference...
The inserts keep the brake line from moving and hold them in place and then you can place a bare wire inside.
So anyone has reference...
The inserts keep the brake line from moving and hold them in place and then you can place a bare wire inside.
12
29er / Re: Rwc bearings size for IP036
« on: February 24, 2015, 07:22:42 PM »
Look at my thread. 22.2 and 22.7
14
26er & 27.5 (650b) / Re: Carbonal Venture SL budget lightweight 1x10 build
« on: February 17, 2015, 06:38:40 PM »
Where are you located?
15
29er / Re: Time to Build Another One - IP-036 (completed on page 2)
« on: February 13, 2015, 07:26:56 PM »
I have entire season under the belt with the IP-057 and I really like the pedal to power output. Every pedal is instant acceleration with the hardtail. I will tell you though on 15+ mile rides the hard tail starts to wear me down on anything technical.
I only have two rides on the 036 and I find myself locking out the front and rear with the xloc full sprint pretty regularly. I am going through all 120mm of travel up front and in the rear shock at the respective weight to air ratios. I am not sure what to think about this yet or if its ok or if I need to up the air. I definitely feel more in control of the bike with the FS and it feels faster in downhills. The smoothness of riding over technical terrain is very easy.
The only problem I have had with the derailleur is just stretch of the cables and trying to get it to shift back in the top gear. I can absolutely tell the difference in the crispness of shifting between the new bike and old though.
How do I determine whether it is 2.0 or 2.1?
I only have two rides on the 036 and I find myself locking out the front and rear with the xloc full sprint pretty regularly. I am going through all 120mm of travel up front and in the rear shock at the respective weight to air ratios. I am not sure what to think about this yet or if its ok or if I need to up the air. I definitely feel more in control of the bike with the FS and it feels faster in downhills. The smoothness of riding over technical terrain is very easy.
The only problem I have had with the derailleur is just stretch of the cables and trying to get it to shift back in the top gear. I can absolutely tell the difference in the crispness of shifting between the new bike and old though.
How do I determine whether it is 2.0 or 2.1?