Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - MTNRCKT

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 11
46
29er / Re: 29+ frames?
« on: June 02, 2015, 02:46:18 PM »
Wait, what? People are actually making their own CF frames DIY style? That's pretty cool. Not sure I'd do it myself but still interesting. Had no clue.

47
29er / Re: 1 year with my 256
« on: June 01, 2015, 06:09:37 PM »
I'd also be interested to know how much you weigh. Also, if you feel your current rim is too narrow, what width would you go with if you were to do it over again?

Thanks for the long-term update/review.

48
^^hahaha. One of my finer moments was realizing I could use my bike wheel as a wheel of fortune.

I especially like how you didn't waste the opportunity to share the Sun Ringle hub sound  ;D

Oh yeah - ENTER!

49
Vendor Discussion & Reviews / Re: Bad reviews?
« on: May 27, 2015, 09:04:05 AM »
I agree for the most part that it's just a $5 seat clamp, however, it is just as vital to your bike as any other component. I'd be willing to bet that they just forget to put them in there. They shouldn't take it so lightly imo, though. When doing business with someone, even a small thing like this erodes at the trust you have in working with them. Either come through with the seat clamp or don't promise it to me.

Either way, it's a good thing to be aware of - Thanks for the heads-up, byrt.

50
29er / Re: Small crack IP256SL
« on: May 27, 2015, 08:23:25 AM »
Still at least a year left on the warranty, correct? A crack is a crack and should be dealt with under warranty.. It is tiny, though.  Maybe use one of those carbon repair kits and keep an eye on it? If it gets any worse at all I'd be wanting a new frame.

51
29er / Re: Dual Suspension IP-098 build.
« on: May 26, 2015, 03:26:26 PM »
Bump.

Would really like an update on this frame/build.

52
Component Deals & Selection / Re: the carbon speed 42mm rims
« on: May 24, 2015, 08:16:36 PM »
I wouldn't necessarily say any 2.2 tire would fit until tested.  For reference I'm running the 35mm wide , which is 30 on the inside.   Have a 2.1 Thunder Burt mounted on there, but is extremely difficult to seat as the tire doesn't want to spread out that much without some help.  So on a 35mm wide opening some 2.2 tires may not open up enough to seat properly, which may leave them to burping or rolling off the rim in hard use.

Bottom line, if running a 42mm wide rim, you ahould probably run a 2.35 minimum, more likely a 2.5.

Good info - Thanks. Will a 2.5 fit through most of these chiner frames?

Guess I haven't been keeping up with the trend as well as I thought I had bc 42mm seems really wide to me. I'm definitely intrigued though and will do some reading.

53
Enter , enter , enter , enter, enter , enter , enter .

Enter .

ENTER .

E n t e r  !


Surely that's at least doubled my chances ;) JK LOL

Fat Biker

Considering you only have 3 posts I think your chances are at about zero. So if you double that.. still at zero  8)  :D

Besides, you gotta post it big and bold and red if you want to increase your odds; Everybody knows that!

ENTER!

54
29er / Re: IP-057 19" BSA UD matte
« on: May 20, 2015, 04:14:31 PM »
The anticipation is all part of the fun!

That said, I'd skip it and go for the instant gratification if I could  ;D

55
29er / Re: IP-256SL XC Racer Build 18.5lb
« on: May 17, 2015, 04:41:45 PM »
Thanks for the update. Great build thread!

7. Will likely replace with Niner Air 9 RDO frame later this year.

If you're going to spend the money, that's the one to get. Sweet, sweet frames.

56
Fat Bikes / Re: Chinese Carbon Fat Bike Pic Thread
« on: May 13, 2015, 02:45:46 PM »
Probably because it is - that's a 20" kids' fat bike.

Uhh, yeah, of course.. I knew that :-[

Lol, it's obviously a kid's bike now that you point it out. For some odd reason, that possibility didn't even occur to me  :D

57
This the giant bike i would compare a build to...

http://www.giant-bicycles.com/en-ca/bikes/model/tcx.slr.2/20528/80031/

I would use this bike for the odd ride on the road,training in the basement offseason and take it out when im feeling like a new steed on the xc trails....

If you're considering spending $1500 for an aluminum I'd def go the chiner route. I bet if you spent that same $1500 building a chiner you'd have a heck of a lot nicer bike, and it'd be carbon and lighter.

That said, I'm sure you'd be perfectly happy with that Giant. It's a nice bike.

58
Seems like a lot of MTB guys around here are interested in a cyclocross type bike, myself included. I've recently been doing some research into the different groupsets and have decided to most likely go with SRAM rather than Shimano or Campagnolo.

Word seems to be that the Shimano hydraulic brakes (which I've also researched and also sided in favor of) reign as the best much like they do in the MTB world. I was told the SRAM brakes had issues and had a recalls not long ago.. not sure if that's still a concern,  but the consensus still seems to be that the Shimano brakes are better. The Shimano groupset also has a rep for being pretty durable whereas the SRAM has the opposite rep with complaints of shifters breaking, internal ratchets failing, etc). 

I know.. why in the heck would I choose SRAM then?

On the flip side, the SRAM "crispness" in shifting is preferred by lots of people. Many complain that Shimano is too "light" so to speak, and I understand what they mean from having experience with the same things on my MTBs, of course. The other downside for the Shimano that is pushing me towards SRAM is that Shimano seems to be the most susceptible to getting contaminated from environmental conditions - Which is even more of a concern with a CX bike.

So, to summarize,  this is why I've chosen SRAM for a CX build:

-Assuming they have their brake issues sorted (seems to be the case but not sure)
-Crisper shifting
-More reliable drivetrain performance when it gets dirty/muddy
-Even though durability seems questionable, all parts are easily rebuildable and SRAM has a quality warranty service.

All in all, if I built a CX bike I'd go SRAM Apex for a good value, well performing groupset. If I build a road bike I'd go Shimano. The lighter shifting fits better on the smooth road and the issues with performance when it's gets contaminated is not a concern on the road usually. Thing is, if I built a road bike I probably won't be doing a budget build like if I do a CX build; I'd want mechanical shifting and all the other high end components that would do justice to such a cool technology.

Also, I'd most likely do all chiner handle bar, stem, post etc as I'm not concerned at all with failures and I don't want to spend more than I have to. Others may want the "mental security" of some higher end, name brand stem/post/bar though, so to each his own.

Hope that helps. Link to some of the Giant bikes you're considering, I'd be interested to see what you have in mind.

59
After The Ride / Re: Various Full Suspension Designs
« on: May 11, 2015, 08:04:48 PM »
There's also the IP-098

60
After The Ride / Re: Some pic from China Cycle 2015
« on: May 11, 2015, 01:47:20 PM »
The Trek with the Rockshox RS1 looks really nice.

Sure does! Really liking that fork, and I think RS made a great move by making it. Hopefully I'll get to ride one soon.

Cool pics, Carbonfan. So why do you go there? Just for fun or are there suppliers that you purchase from there where you can see there products? I mean..  is it only name brand companies there or are there people like Hong Fu or Iplay or some of the other companies that sell wholesale direct from the factory?

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 11