1
29er / Re: Epic Evo Clone
« on: October 30, 2024, 08:14:59 AM »
What are the typical and constant problems with this frame? Bottom bracket falling out, shock mounting bolt breaking. What else?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
chain stay: 442 mm tried to be accurate
wheelbase: 121 cm
If you make a bottle cage to angle a little(put some shims), then you will be able to mount 900ml.
Photo without any shims:
Got my frame a couple of days ago. Was able to ride it a little bit, to take photos. The weather is a total mess for last week. So only asphalt ride
From what i found out: it has very good pedal efficiency(does not bob at all in open mode). Looks like that anti squat values are above 100% with my 32t chainring.
Everything looks to be a very good quality. Assembly was easy.
SL version UD gloss in size M is 1950g without rear hanger and axle.
Will update, when I will have more rides including offroad.
XC or Trail? Some more info?
Do you know what measurements all the rear suspension bearings are?
So who has one of these? Is there a better, more active page for this model? I'm really curious to see how these are in the real world.
Sufficient inventory, Welcome to order.
vivian@tantancycling.com
sales01@tantancycling.com
WhatsApp:+86 13690938214
use sideloader 750ml
Yeah that's highly optimistic, and not what I was told. This seems much more realistic.
Yes,we have light weight version for FM138, and the price for frame FM138-SL is $750.
Normal version FM138,size L,weight:2080g±45g.
Light weight version FM138-SL,size L ,weight:1930±45g.
No any strength difference, if the rider weight ≤100KG is ok .
I'm in the process of ordering one, so I can report back when it arrives.
How is everyone doing with long term durability? I have a second hand vitus. It looked immaculate when I bought it, but who knows how much use it had? I since put on about 1000 km before finding a crack in the drive side chainstay.
Sanding back it seems that the carbon on the bottom of the chainsay in this area was poorly consolidated (about 2 cm long). I assume given it was a narrow section that the bladder did not apply good pressure during manufacture. I assume that this is an uncommon issue.
[/img]