Chinese Carbon MTB Forums
News:
Happy Holidays!
See likes
See likes given/taken
| Post info | No. of Likes |
|---|---|
Re: WheelTop EDS TX Full Wireless Groupset (Chinese SRAM)
Save us magene This is quite literally Magene's warranty policy: https://support.magene.com/hc/en-us/articles/900002358986-Warranty I got served this bullshit when the integrated chainring on my $500 QED crankset/powermeter went out of true. They sent me a new chainring "out of generosity", but never refunded me. I'm pissed. They damn well know the product is defective because they pulled it from the shelves, but never made me whole. May 21, 2024, 02:41:07 PM |
2 |
|
Re: Transferring Components from a Damaged Giant Defy 1 to a New Frame
So the biggest issue when selecting a new frame is minimizing the number of new components you need to buy. You definitely need to plan on getting new brake hoses, brake barbs and olives, cable housing and cables that you can cut to match the new cable routing. Pretty much in every case you need new bottom bracket bearings since it’s easier to just buy new ones than try to extract your old ones. You also are going to have issues with the integrated cable routing on these newer Chiner frames. Your defy has semi internal, which means your stem won’t be compatible. So you’ll need a new stem to match the integrated cable routing, or you can buy an integrated handlebar. Many of these frames come with a handlebar or stem that matches that bikes routing, so that’s something worth paying attention to. You will also need some specialized tools if you don’t already have them. Cable housing cutters, tools to remove the cassette and disc brake lock rings (if you have center lock discs), and a tool for your new bottom bracket—depending on which standard your new frame has. Also a bleed kit for your brake swap. That’s pretty much everything I can think of off the top of my head May 22, 2024, 07:35:10 AM |
1 |
Re: Seka Spear
I've been wondering why I have not been able to hit the sort of speeds on descents with my current bike compared to bikes in the past (I had taken a break from cycling for about 5 years). I weigh about 10 lbs more, my kit is much more aero nowadays, my helmet is aero, my wheels are 45mm deep instead of 25-28mm depth, my bike weighs about 3 pounds more, I typically carry a lot more food and water and I'm still not hitting the speeds I had been. Learning about the differences in Chinese geo vs Western geo yesterday when reading about these frames made me realize the frame I'm on now is much more 'western' and the frames I had been riding previously were Chinese geo. So all those new advantages in weight, equipment aero are nothing compared to the more aggressive body position Chinese frames will put you in. Something I found interesting. I'm typically topping out at 4-5mph less on many of my regular descents in a tuck now vs a tuck then. Just to point out, the prevailing trend is to fit higher stack, longer reach, narrower handlebar, minimum saddle setback, shorter cranks. Basically to try and achieve the same (or more aggressive) hip angle as you'd get from the old slam-that-stem bike-fit, but move the arms and hands further up to make the aero hoods position easier. (see Victor Campenaerts's latest Orbea Orca video) I've been racing for 16 years and have adopted the new fit trends, and can attest that since then I'm typically topping out 1-2mph higher, and easily setting PRs on flatter/rolling segments, despite being fatter and slower than I was a few years ago before making these changes on my new bike. If you find yourself going slower on a modern bike I really suggest you go over your handlebar position and try to get longer and narrower. My Seka's Exceed geometry has a fairly high stack (although is now actually quite normal compared to Cannondale's S6E, or the Tarmac).But a big knock I'll give it is the short reach and relatively laid back seat tube angle. To achieve the "modern" bike fit, I have struggled to fit a properly long stem, and have to slam my saddle all the way forward on a zero-setback seatpost. The Spear seems to have at least addressed these two shortcomings with slightly longer reach and steeper seat tube. Quote Have to wonder how much of these new crop of "high dollar budget" frames are just dumping loads of cash into presentation/marketing/website and are basically the same deal as other frames more in the 700-900 dollar range. As a Seka owner that's fairly active on the WW thread, I'm convinced you're paying for higher quality finishing kit, paint, warranty, and a genuinely better frame. Better doesn't mean perfect--I indeed am one of the people who suffered from the loose seatpost issue, as well as an unrelated frame-creaking issue that required warranty replacement. Take a look at Ribble, similar price-point, but there's a well-known WW thread documenting some pretty terrible quality issues. If you look at the competition there really aren't many/any options offering a 700g aero-optimized/tested standalone frame at this price point. My big concern is that the price point is getting so high that you might as well buy a domestic name-brand frame. Building up a Spear with Ultegra Di2 would run something like $6000-7000? You can get a new Cannondale S6E with Ultegra for less. I think Seka realizes this, which is why I believe Seka isn't pushing hard on selling in the western market. June 13, 2024, 12:10:32 PM |
2 |
Re: TFSA JH-15 and JH-10 - lightweight and aero disc frames
Just out of curiosity: From which frame is the TFSA JH-10 a nock-off? The BXT-075 is not the same frame, the 075 is an older design that doesn't have full internal cable routing, if you pay attention to the details of the design you'll see many differences. The JH-10 isn't knocking-off any specific frame in particular. I guess the fork/headtube area bears some resemblance to the Scott Foil but it really seems to be an original design June 16, 2024, 05:07:52 PM |
1 |