See likes given/taken
Post info | No. of Likes |
---|---|
Re: Looking for a carbon triathlon frame
ICAN TT017 https://www.icanbikes.com/Products-list/carbon-tt-bike-frame/ Flybike / Carbonda FM1366 Same frame afaik. Unsure whether one OEMs for the other, or if ICAN may be getting the frames from another OEM. But I suspect it's simple, and Flybike sells to ICAN. You can email Wing & Crystal about it. They dont have size Medium until December, apparently. Tantan does have TT bikes btw. http://tantancycling.com/index.php?_m=mod_product&_a=view&p_id=1122 TT912, TT913. Someone on this forum says his TT912 does clear 32C. The 913 is much newer. Miracle bikes also has TT bikes: http://mira-factory.com/Product/detail/id/14.html (same as Tantan 912, afaik, so probably an open mould?) On brands, i wouldnt spend money on Trifox Airwolf or twitter. Yoeleo is a brand selling 500 frames for 1000, so not a value play. Lightcarbon is making me anxious with the horrid QC of some of the frames they've shipped to people on this forum - Velobuild, for eg, hasn't had that kind of bad press in years, as far as i can tell on this forum.... Ican is a brand, but the quote i got for the TT017 is competitive, so definitely considering them. I've built 2 winow frames. Not the biggest fan, better tolerances & better sales rep interaction with Long Teng. Elves, never. That's purely my perspective, not meant to be gospel. Me wanting something that is "newer tech" costs in western branded frames 3 times as much like the latest P-series or shiv. Both difficult to get in frames but will take 30c and run disc's.Do you mean that there are brands that are up to date in terms of tyre width best practices, and they're so niche they're even more expensive than Specialized and the likes? Very curious to see their products & marketing. I don't want to sound like a coolaid drinker, but i've rebuilt my rim supersix hi mod with 25mm (expensive) tubulars, whole bike weighs 6kg, and done a couple of rides on it, after riding my LT268 for the whole season. It feels bad descending because it's jittery AF (tyres), it feels bad on bad tarmac (tyres), i'm not materially faster uphill (comparing max efforts). That frame is the himod model from 2015, which Sagan raced on (ie highest tier carbon). Wheels are Campagnolo bora one. Sram red crank. Expensive tubulars. Rebuilt myself. And it feels great to ride a 6kg bike, and on good asphalt, you're tempted to surge out of the saddle on every little climb, i feels super stiff & agile (probably mostly because of the 105psi tyres and 6kg weight), vs my Tractor is just that: a tractor. The tractor climbing at 10kmh doesnt feel as nice. But it's at worst not slower uphill (limited data, but i doubt i'm wrong), and absolutely faster downhill & on the flat (quite dramatically). I also sold earlier in the year my giant propel set up with 25mm GP5000 clinchers because the Tractor was so much nicer to ride on the same roads so i figured i wouldn't really want to ride the giant anymore. And so, it bothers me to hear that TT / triathlon dudes are happy with 23 and 25mm tyres. Especially triathletes, where the whole point is to do a sustainable effort and getting every bit of speed out of a given effort (rather than maybe a short TT where somehow you feel like, maybe like a hill climb, that you want a super stiff bike blablabla. You can't underplay comfort in triathlon context. Btw, 36cm bars are shit to sprint with, but i'd rather go downhill with my tractor w 36cm bars than my supersix with 42cm bars. You dont need wide bars to control a descent, and very few routes / races where you take your TT bike have sketchy downhills. But every second of every minute where you have a 40 or 42cm bar vs a 36cm one, you have more frontal area catching the wind and doing nothing for you. October 21, 2024, 04:27:51 AM |
1 |
Re: Looking for a carbon triathlon frame
Hi All, Hongfu also has a good tt frame with disc brakes, but also a little older. Regarding rear tire size 28 mm is the normal width on current bikes (what i see on other setups) October 21, 2024, 05:57:15 AM |
1 |
Re: Looking for a carbon triathlon frame
I notice the BB of all the other frames are BB386 or BB86 both of which are press fit (is it considered old tech now?). Given this is my first bike build since the 90's (yes I am an old fecker), I was steering towards a frame with the T47 BB. BB386 / BB86 shouldnt be used to run DUB / 30mm spindles (bearings end up too thin & dont last). So T47 is more versatile / more modern. Assuming the OEM that made the frame is competent enough, BB386 / BB86 is fine. Peak Torque has recently mentioned that Shimano BB (the ghetto 2 plastic cups version) is the unsung hero of BB386 / BB86, because it's very forgiving of poor QC / manufacturing tolerances. I've been using ZTTO alu sleeves BB (2 bits that screw together) for all the BB386 / BB86 frames i've built (on the giant propel i rebuilt there was a rivet in the way so i had to use a shimano in fact), and i've now been using liqui moly 3312 on every conceivable surface, and it's been great. Mechanically, an alu sleeve should be stiffer than the Shimano cups, and it's cheap and easy to order from Alix. So. All else equal, get the T47 because it's more versatile & future proof. But if you prefer frame A over B, and only B has T47, then dont worry and get A. And re. Tavelo, nobody should be forced to use shimano cups or remove material themselves from a BB area to prevent the frame from cracking when installing a BB, that's just a farce, especially for the cost. Just dont buy Tavelo. October 22, 2024, 02:45:02 AM |
1 |
Re: Looking for a carbon triathlon frame
BB386 / BB86 shouldnt be used to run DUB / 30mm spindles (bearings end up too thin & dont last). So T47 is more versatile / more modern. Just a note here - BB386 is not the same as BB86. BB386 is designed for oversize (29/30mm) axles and works just fine with them, they use regular size bearings. As a result, it's probably the most future-proof of the press-fit standards. There has been some caution around using BB86 and SRAM DUB cranks due to the use of undersize bearings. While this is theoretically an issue, many brands that use them across a wide variety of frames (Canyon, Scott, Giant and Merida are probably the biggest brands that use it widely) don't seem to have any issues. I have no practical experience in this respect thing. I agree with the conclusion though, bottom bracket type shouldn't really play a major role in frame choice. Press-fit is easy to deal with, and there's a variety of kits on AliExpress that make the process very simple (arguably no harder than threading in). October 22, 2024, 03:32:54 AM |
1 |