Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Kactusdog

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]
61
It has been resurrected .. last year it was possible to buy again and now there is a new 505SL available, that can go fully integrated but has the same geometry like the "classic" one.

I love mine

Holy cow, that’s sick. Can you share some photos? I’d love any info on that you can share. I’m looking for something in this realm. Aero/integrated, 42mm clearance, and slightly more endurance geo is nice.

62
If VeloBuild can somehow provide a similar level of unique design, QC, fit and finish with future releases as they've done with this CX frame...this will solve a lot headaches and perhaps even regain customer trust.

Bike build and first official ride video below.

YouTube Search Title: My VeloBuild CX-002 Is FINISHED! - Total Winner


Hey Patrick, thanks for the content there, how has your experience been with it so far? Would love to hear about the ride quality, quirks, etc.

I’m looking at this for replacing my Carbonda CFR696 and fulfilling recent road bike needs, running two wheelsets on this instead with Rival AXS 2x. I ride a bit of rough AZ unpaved trails, and lots of rough torn up road. GP5K 32’s on one wheelset, 42 S-Works Pathfinders on the other. I’d prefer a relatively light bike for being an all rounder, but the aero qualities is what I am after here. All internal, performance at speed is what has appealed to me here. I do appreciate the number leaning towards handling rather than stability, but still a longer wheelbase than a typical road race bike. My Carbonda feels more like an SUV than an all rounder.

I considered the Factor Ostro VAM and just riding that with the biggest tires I can fit. That would mean forgoing the Pathfinders and grabbing my MTB instead, but I worry about the shorter wheelbase of the Factor being too twitchy…

63
29er / Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
« on: May 24, 2023, 11:18:00 PM »
I think those riders advocating for the smaller size are focused on XC racing where a very small percent of the course requires a long, low, slack bike. So, they shorten it and ride higher.

Most of my riding is for giggles and I’m chasing buddies on Yeti (SB140) Lunch Rides through a variety of terrain.

Gotcha, yeah I do enter in the occasional races when training and time permits, as I have a little girl now  :D

Is this still a race-able bike in the 120 front/rear config?

64
29er / Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
« on: May 24, 2023, 10:14:46 PM »
The Fuse is a relatively slack hard tail. What specific geometry measurement drove you to a M? Was it wheel base only?

I have ridden my hardtail a lot this spring and it is a size smaller than my 936. One thing my riding buddies noticed is that I take less risks on my hard tail. I take the B line a lot, navigating around obstacles or high consequence features.

The 936 wants to go straight. It begs you to feather the brakes and seek the apex at speeds you would never even consider on a hard tail. You want the longer wheel base to provide confidence in cornering. To provide the counter balance to your body getting really low and into the bike.

Get the Large.

What a motivational response! I rode a size L Fuse, the reach and stack roughly match the size M. But man, in hindsight the effective top tube, bb drop (i think) and the feedback from a few forum threads (before I found Chinertown) had me leaning towards  the size M.

I recently learned how the hardtail compress forward and gets a tad longer, where the full sus shrinks a bit. Getting cramped during the rear’s actuation.

65
29er / Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
« on: May 24, 2023, 04:51:20 PM »
It sounds like the sag is fine then.
Yes, you're right for a dc kind of bike 740mm seems off, I ride a 780mm with a 5cm stem and I'm 174cm! But If you look at the ns synonym they offer 60mm by 760mm for M, L and Xl.

I also have the 120mm rear link for a couple of weeks. It's even more on then in the bike even with 30+ sag. Helps for the peddle hits. But it doesn't feels that different to be honest, maybe bit more souple? You'll keep a fast snappy bike, not a totall different one.

Can you share any photos? I am probably going to buy a size L and try to sell my M. I think I will leave the shock with it, as it's all color matched at this point. I need to weight out here if the 120 rear with my 120 SID will be a better ride for my rocky, rough environment than keeping the travel at 42.5, or even 40.

Do you see any benefits of the 40mm or 42.5mm rears' travel? Or rather I should ask, is there a clear benefit to building with the new linkage. I am new to FS, so trying to make sense of it all. I had to really pump up my rear to 250 psi to make the L compression tune work for my trails, 23mm sag...

66
29er / Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
« on: May 24, 2023, 04:45:12 PM »
Before you cut the bars, move the grips and all of the controls in 10mm on either side and go for a ride. Focus on keeping your hands on the new position and see how it feels. Once you've cut them, you can't go back.
I presume your seat is already as far back as it will allow?

Yes that sounds good, and yes. I did just purchase a power saddle with rails that provide a platform further back from where my current fake power one sits. I will have to try that, but I know this bike is meant to be sat at zero offset and reaching forward. Looking to purchase a L now...

67
I currently have an ongoing case with my SP-M05 frame. will report.

Can you tell me what's going on with it? I had a similar issue, the chainstay near the brake posts on the rear cracked when testing the braking down the street from my home. It was very frustrating that this happened but they took care of the issue.

I really hope there are no similar issues with this frame. I am looking for a 120mm travel XC bike.

68
29er / Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
« on: May 24, 2023, 10:05:04 AM »
Partly I agree, but cutting your bars is a bad advise if people have a wonky feeling, it will get worse. When tight corning is your problem sizing up won't help either, it makes it worse. Probably it's your skills...it needs to be turned more like a motorbike in titght cornes, lay the bike down instead of you.

And other thing, light compression damping with your length could also be an issue if you're +++kg's. The wont be supportive in cornering, so maybe using less sag?

Good luck

Thanks for the feedback, yes I was concerned about sizing up being too cumbersome in the first place. I’m open to changing my cockpit set up. From the start, I wished to avoid a bike that’s hard to maneuver (wheelbase) hence the Medium. I weight 78-79 kg, to prevent the suspensión from being too active, i have it pumped to about 230-250 psi i believe. I get lots of good small bump absorption, and the suspension works as intended everywhere else. Haven’t bottomed out either.

What I find strange though is that Vitus specs their top of the line size M with an 80mm stem and 740 bars… what? And the size L goes to a 90mm stem!!

Also: What would the new 120mm rear link offer me? Seems like it rides with a higher bb, maybe that’s an opportunity to get a size L and ride it lower in the sag to feel more “inside the bike” as opposed to being perched atop it.

69
29er / Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
« on: May 23, 2023, 05:09:15 PM »
Hey all, on the 936 in size Medium, have done a handful of rides on it... feeling regrets choosing the SL size M. I am 182 cm with longish legs. It feels cramped at times. A ride I did with lots of tight corners (I live in rocky, chunky Arizona) revealed how awkward I feel on the bike. Then again I could also just be lacking cornering skills. I'm coming from a size L Specialized Fuse with a 170 cranks and a 45mm stem. First time riding a full sus, the hardtail felt so much more straight forward. I ride rough XC with some occasional rough trail.

I heard a lot of cases reading through all the pages for "sizing up", but I am also taking RAD into consideration. But when the suspension (Rockshox RT M rebound, L compression) is active, steering get's wonky. It feels like reach shortens. The straight-line speed is excellent though.

I am currently riding a 50mm stem with 780 bars, but I did also pick up a 75mm stem to lengthen things out. The result was a floppy steering, I'm feeling stuck and not sure if there's anything that can be done to "fix" the fit. I'm open to any ideas y'all may have. If I must go large, wouldn't that make my stem tiny?? I am definitely on the bike to tackle challenging/technical climb, the downhill is a fun bonus :)

70
Cyclocross Frames, Wheels & Components / Re: Carbonda Gravel CFR505 build
« on: January 23, 2023, 05:40:07 PM »
It is built !







From a quick tour around the block, the first impressions are great.
Feels light, stiff, agile to turn and I love its ultra-flashy look compared to my other black bikes ;D

Some doubts or issue I had during the build:
  • Straight pull hubs & spokes:
    I thought the hubs were two cross, while they were 3 cross.
    The ERD was 593mm instead of the 590 announced, that would have made a difference too.
    So I had to return and reorder a set of spokes.
    They were the easiest wheels I ever built.
    And the lightest at 1218g(Ultralight 29er rims from Peter, CX-Ray spokes, SAPIM alloy nipples, and Novatec hubs D411CB/D412CB.
    The rear hub freewheel is dead silent ! And without a front derailleur, this is a very silent bike. Will need a bell !
     
  • Tires:
    One of the most complex choice to me was about the tires for a gravel.
    There doesn't seem to be a best solution.
    Either you want to ride more on hard or soft terrain, and need appropriate tires.
    So in the end I took them light and mixed. The Maxxis Rambler 40mm.
    They were surprisingly easy to setup tubeless on the internal 19.6mm rims.
    Mount. Inflate with the compressor. Pop/Pop. Done.
     
  • The axles:
    I ordered a pair of Hardlite axles on ebay.As another Carbonda owner did( although poorly detailed ).
    They looked good but in fact were not compatible.
    The front 15x100 was an MTB one. Road ones are shorter, 125mm long axle.
    So I took a ROCK SHOX Maxle Stealth 15x100 with 1.5mm pitch.
    The rear drive dropout is not threaded, but need a nut, like the DT Swiss E-thru axle.
    I have a temp solution for now, but will find a M12x1.5mm nut somewhere to put on the Hardlite rear.
     
  • SRAM Red Etap:
    Using etap without front derailleur, is not a problem.
    11x36 cassette(CX1 Cassette PG-1170) with the wifli version of the rear derailleur is not an issue either. The capacity of the derailleur is 28T.
    The conversion of my two ring crank(with hidden bolt) to a single CX1 chainring went without issue.
    The Titanium bolts are from Ali. And used the hidden screw that came with the ring. The 2mm washers were useless.
    I rotate with 3 chains,  the SRAM PC-1170
     
  • Brakes:
    I didn't have the bleeding edge tool to bleed the brakes(damn SRAM to add yet another nozzle).
    So, I was extra careful when cutting the brake hose and route them through the frame.
    And not add air to the system.
    Setting the lever to have the nut vertical and adding some DOT liquid in it before remounting everything.
    It worked.
    The internal routing was very easy. A white tube was there in the frame to guide the rear hose. And there are holes in the fork for the front.
    Unfortunately I cut the front hose a tad to short( my first road bike bar... ), it is quite ok but sad.
    I was scared by taping the bar too, but it went well. I hesitated a long time between black and the yellow, but returned the black.
    And I didn't receive the brake disc from Ali yet, so I've temporarily put some used ones I had.
     
  • Design blues:
    Just for the aesthetics. When I see now all these useless black holes and screw, I could have ordered the frame without them. I saw later it was possible.
    Carbonda provide a set a various plugs/end caps but they didn't think as minimalistic as this build. No plug at the rear derailleur exit cable. No second rubber plug for the right shifter hose entry.
    Not sure I will ever use mudguards. And I replaced all screws with vinyl ones for now.

For the ones who care about this: it weights just over 7.4kg as it is on the pictures, and feels very light when holding it and riding it  :D

I've been considering this frame for quite a while, but let me ask you, this is a BB386, does that mean I could run a dub XX1 crankset for mountain bikes?

71
29er / Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
« on: January 07, 2023, 11:26:11 PM »
Wow… I made it. I completed the 147 pages of this thread, what a journey some of you have gone through! Feels like I just finished a novel.

Currently assembling mine, will report back with the complete build and ride feel! I’m 180cm tall but went with the M in SL. The paint brought it back down to a “normal weight”.

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]