Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Hayek

Pages: [1]
1
29er / Re: HongFu FM138
« on: January 15, 2025, 03:00:51 PM »
Hey, @Hayek what LightCarbon wheels did you get? I'm thinking about their trail model, but 26mm internal width is a bit narrow for my liking. Anyone running HongFu FM138? What wheels do you have on yours?

I had LightCarbon build the "MC932GP-XC" rims with DT hubs. Those are 27mm ID, which is in line with what I like for an XC bike, but I was also aiming for a sub-1200 gram wheelset and that was the way to get there. They're absolutely awesome wheels.

But yes, if you want wider ID, maybe check out Elite. I have two of their wheelsets (Pro33 XC and gravel) and the build quality is really impressive. Their Pro36 wheelset has a 30mm ID, and aren't overly heavy.

2
29er / Re: HongFu FM138
« on: January 05, 2025, 11:38:40 PM »
@Figo, I have a Protaper Hyperlite flat bar.

3
29er / Re: HongFu FM138
« on: January 01, 2025, 02:24:35 PM »
I meant to post this build earlier, but better late than never, and I can add a full review as well.

I ordered the FM138 in size large and had it painted in Pantone "Red Pear" gloss clearcoat. First bike I've gotten from Hongfu (I've mostly bought LightCarbon and Carbonda), so wasn't sure what kind of quality to expect but the frame quality and paint were as good as anything I've gotten from anywhere else. Everything went together easily, including the headset cable routing (I used a Deda headset) with the exception of the rear brake caliper, like I mentioned above. I did a mix of SRAM Transmission parts and LightCarbon wheels with Conti Cross King tires. I opted for 120mm front and rear with RockShox SID and SIDluxe. At 181 cm tall, I started with a 60mm stem on the size large but ended up swapping to a 70mm and prefer the feel of that more. Came out to 10.85 kg including pedals.

The Good: I've put 1500 km so far, and it's been a great bike. My last XC bike build was the FM936. This bike climbs and covers ground noticeably easier, especially in tight and techy terrain, but feels sharper on the descents, requiring a touch more finesse. In general, it feels like a sharper bike than the 936. It's every bit as capable, but takes a little bit more attention on the descents and requires less attention on the climbs, especially tech climbs. I chose not to do a remote lockout and have not regretted it. The seated climbing manners on the bike are excellent, with the anti-squat being high enough to keep the bike very stable under pedaling, and yet it has had no issue getting into its 120mm of rear travel. All told, it's a very good XC bike, and the frame details are quite good. I've enjoyed being able to carry to two full-size bottles in the frame. I used a little plastic spacer under the top bolt of the seat tube bottle cage and that small angle adjustment has kept the bottle from contacting the frame at any point. The bike is also very quiet. No creaking as long as I keep everything clean.

The Bad: I had ordered SRAM Level 4-piston and the frame didn't leave enough room for the caliper to center on the rotor. I tried 160mm and 180mm rotors and I'd still get a small amount of pad contact on the rotor no matter what. Malissa said it was a SRAM problem as the frame was designed for Shimano brakes (sounds like whatever the brake you choose to run, they're going to say it was designed for something else), but I opted to remove some material from the caliper and that solved the issue. 1,500km later and it has been a non-issue. The seat tube could be shorter to allow for longer droppers, but I was able to fit a 150mm post with room to spare. And it's an XC bike after all. If you want to run 200mm on an XC bike you might be looking at the wrong bike.

The brake is the one issue I've had. I don't want to say it's a minor issue, because it can't be fixed and experimenting with brake calipers is extremely expensive, and machining away material from the caliper clearly voids the warranty. I've been transparent about that with friends, but those who have spent some time on mine have decided that it's a minor enough con that certainly doesn't outweigh all the pros. I've had several friends order the same frame, and even have another one on order at the moment that I'm building up for another friend. Malissa was actually very good to work with and I have no complaints outside of the brake mount.

4
29er / Re: HongFu FM138
« on: January 01, 2025, 01:36:31 PM »
Hi. I'm reaching out to see what brakes you've installed on your FM138. I've been discussing this with Malissa from HongFu and there seems to be an ongoing issue with Shimano brake compatibility. Specifically, the M6120, M7120, and M8120 series are not recommended. Additionally, a customer reported difficulties installing a rear XT M8100 brake. Malissa suggested exploring SRAM brakes as an alternative. While this seems unusual, I won't be able to verify the compatibility issues with Shimano brakes until I receive the frame.

Interesting. I ran SRAM Level 4-piston on mine (size L), and ran into issues. The outside edge of the caliper contacts the frame and prevented me from the moving the brake outward enough to center the pads on the rotor. Malissa told me it was because the frame was designed for Shimano and Magura brakes only. There's just very little room for the rear brake. I didn't want to get another set of brakes so removed some material from the caliper so it wouldn't contact the frame. An annoying solution that voids the warranty on my brake for a problem that shouldn't exist.

5
29er / Re: HongFu FM138
« on: November 22, 2023, 10:21:59 AM »
Just ordered the frame this morning. Was more straightforward than some of the other manufacturers that I've dealt with. I'll post again as soon as I receive it and give an assessment of how it compares in quality to Carbonda and LightCarbon.

6
29er / Re: TanTan - Seraph FM121 XC 120mm Full Suspension 2024 model
« on: August 25, 2023, 08:17:20 PM »
I understand, now I see. Now it is clear why it will appear on sale from the Chinese. The old version no longer needs exclusive rights))

yes, then this frame is 100mm stroke

Why do you say that it’ll be 100mm travel? The geo chart you shared (the same one they sent me) specifies 120mm. They’re calling it the 121 as well. Looks like it’s pointed at being the Epic Evo rather than the Epic.

7
29er / Re: Ican S3 XC Frame
« on: August 21, 2021, 07:56:04 PM »
I’ve finally finished building mine up and have had a chance to put around 200 miles and 30,000’ of climbing/descending on it. Decided to run 45mm stroke on the rear shock to give me ~112mm rear travel with a 120mm fork and it rides great. Mine came in at 23.5# as pictured. My previous XC bike was a hardtail so I can’t say what a “good” XC suspension platform feels like in comparison, but I’ve felt like it offers plenty of pedaling support while remaining active enough to make trail riding fun. Overall, really happy with the bike. It’s been a blast.

8
29er / Re: Ican S3 XC Frame
« on: May 07, 2021, 06:45:25 PM »
I’m new here and this is my first post, but I just received my ICAN S3 frame. Frame looks great, good grease in the bearings, and just overall nice finish. One thing I’m missing though is any spec on the shock mounting hardware. I can’t find what dimensions are needed anywhere on their site. Anyone know? I apologize in advance if this is an ignorant question.

Pages: [1]