Edit: I don't know, perhaps it's just my job, where experimental evidence is the only thing that matters, manifesting...
I had and lost a whole long response. My point was I spent most of my career in engineering and data analysis and have found that data alone isn't enough; you have to understand the data's completeness and relevance to the problem you are trying to solve. In terms of determining the quality/safety of a bike frame and its related company, to me the # of folks riding and reviewing them is prob the best data. Yes obviously there are going to be issues with every brand, but a more established + high volume brand usually handles them better and has a lower problem probability overall.
So I may be overly conservative, but I wouldnt bother with any fly by night pop up store/brand selling these replicas. Theres just not enough user/brand history to draw any meaningful conclusions on the quality or safety of the frame. And odds are you will be completely SOL if there are any issues. A lot of needless risk IMO. I just dont understand the replica thing. I mean I can understand an SLx clone from a big brand. But this shit here? Gambling with your life to make people think you bought a Factor just seems crazy to me.