Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - neobiker

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 14
1
You are far too kind and generous @glepore thank you!

I'm still reviewing TanTan's latest gravel frame so I don't wanna ruin my good graces with them until all the video content has been fulfilled. Also I suspect they wouldn't be keen on sending the X68 for reviews since they don't really wanna be promoting clones in public's eye. The X38 Scott Foil clone I paid for myself.

TanTan would most likely want me to commit financially to the X68. I'll see if I can negotiate haha. It's 2 month turnaround anyway.

I guess you should do more penetration test to make content :)

2
interesting to see that the team is receiving the groupset, but the general consumer cannot get it.

Let the pro test it before the consumer I guess?

3
Check the seat post angle and whether this makes it less aggressive?

4
Did someone buy a LCR017-D in the smaller size? 46
It seems all the frames I saw posted are all big sizes. Short people dont buy it?

I think the 46 size had been added only recently.

5
The new high-performance carbon spoke wheels have been designed and tested for durability, light weight and reliability. Here are the key features:
Wheel Depth: 50mm
Inner Width: 21mm
Spoke Count: 20H
Spoke Material: 3.4mm carbon spokes (lightweight and very strong)
Hubs: Custom designed hubs with steel bearings for smooth and long-lasting performance
Total Wheel Weight: 1200g.
To ensure these wheels meet the needs of serious riders, we conducted extensive testing. Here are the results:

1. Carbon Spoke Tensile Strength Test
The carbon spokes were tested to the breaking point and can withstand a maximum of 400kgf of tension before breaking. This shows excellent strength and reliability even under extreme loads.

2. Simulated Road Fatigue Test
The wheels were put through a simulated ride of 1000km at an average speed of 25km/h.
In this test, the wheels passed over 75,000 simulated obstacles to replicate real-world road conditions.
The wheels showed no signs of structural failure or noticeable wear, demonstrating their durability over long rides.

3. Torque fatigue testing
Front wheel: disc brake side tested 50,000 times under high torque conditions.
Rear wheel: disc brake side and drive side tested 50,000 times each.
The wheels maintained their integrity throughout the test, demonstrating excellent resistance to torque-related stresses, especially under heavy braking and acceleration.

Any price for this wheeler?

6
Lightcarbon had a model [LCG072-D], but it was purchased for an exclusive licensing. I reckon it is a matter of time before they announce a new model which should cover your need.

7
As for the price increases, we might want to wait a bit, I expect it is because the anniversary sales is coming and store are jacking up the prices so that the discount seems bigger.

8
Road Bike Frames, Wheels & Components / Re: Kocevlo RD01
« on: March 02, 2025, 07:42:31 AM »
Their handlebar are famous for not being really proof safe xD

9
I wrote "unrideable garbage".
Video sign off and various check lists would sure be nice. Alibaba offers, for a fee, something like that.
It probably doesnt make economical sense, but factories could choose to offer the white glove service as an option, & see what happens. In essence, Hambini suggested that with his made up Z1-2-3.

Fun fact: people say they want organic and stuff that takes better care of the workers, nature and all. Then IRL, they dont buy it, & go for the cheaper option instead. En masse, people simply want to pay less for stuff when nobody is watching.

QC is supposed to reject the unrideable garbage, it's part of the job description, as you must draw the line somewhere.
However, mistakes are unavoidable; I just want to receive something that's 90+% fine. Expecting 100% is unrealistic (80/20 rule).
I think the current system broadly works, and this forum is great: you pick factories that in your estimation are the least likely to cause you headache.

+1


I have no interest in my OEM carbon bike factory hiring Loulou the duchess, chief happiness officer, to send me tiktok reels of my frame being built & what her colleagues had for breakfast. I dont want to pay for it. I want my factory focused on design & execution.

For the last part, I was thinking about camera well place during manufacturing, automatic tagging and computer vision [please don’t write AI] to detect any defect and share the input for decisions. Nowadays, you can even have 3D mesh of the bike with a few pictures, higher resolutions of these meshes would allows us to spot obvious quality issues.

At their scale, a raspberry pi v5 and some accelerated hardware could probably handle the load.

Moreover, if this really work at scale and somehow autonomously, we would probably have a trickle down effect as big purchaser would see this a double insurance and the price small retailer would probably marginale compared to the price of the frame.

That being said a short for your frame which is fed to a computer vision algorithm would honestly be a good QC for us, as it would already better than any offer from western brand.

10
I agree with serge on this one. That's a luxury brand experience. I get it that you'd be willing to pay for it, but it's a big overhead. Not even Sworks etc do such thing.

Execution time, complexity and scalability just don't simply justify it. In any case, if I'm not mistake n you can ask LC or any other to take a pic and send it to you before they ship. But it's not an approval in most cases. It's just to show the end result.

Maybe the manufacturers can show us they can be more innovative than stiffer, lighter and more aero frames.

11
You'd need a robust ERP to make this viable, so that the right video is uploaded in the right place and made available to the right client. It would be nice, but feels unnecessary. Also, it would slow things down, because you'd have customers having to effectively sign off on the frame, that can easily add 1 week on average, because now between paint and shipping, you have an extra stage, extra storage, and so on.

Alternatively, and more simply, it's called basic QC, where the factory isnt supposed to ship unrideable garbage. Where i come from, people take pride in the stuff they make. Right or wrong, If i receive shit in a box, i feel personally insulted.

The challenge is you are setting the quality bar really high, even high end Swiss watch makers have non zero quality issues (I know as my mother was working for a luxury brand).

As for video sharing, we can just have email exchange via mails, Youtube can also host private videos, so I think this would be an acceptable technological solution.

As for the delay, if consumers are paying, why not? As for an additional week of delay/shipping, I think most would be happy if this ensures there is less risk on quality and provides an additional quality review. I waited 4 months for one order, one week would not have made any difference.

Finally, I think the argument of quality should be refined: I think the workers also want to make products of high quality, but we don't know the environment/conditions in which they work or of they have the allotted time to make good product. [See what happens in fast fashion for example].

12
Looking forward to seeing your next frame. In the hair dresser business, they say that you're only as good as your last haircut. In the bike frame business sold one by one and shipped by air across the world for 125$+, 1 bad frame that should have never left the factory in the hands of a customer makes more damage than the goodwill created from the other 50+ frames that were shipped out without problems, because we customers sit across the globe, we often wait a long time for the frame, and if we have to ship it back, it's very expensive. So, one thing this forum does is help identify which sellers often ship bad frames (Airwolf is one that somehow is always associated with problems), so we can avoid them. At least, that's how i look at it myself.

Maybe what I read from this: LC could offer an extra option where there is a video of the frame with all the checks one would like for quality control before shipping. How much would that cost? In this case everyone would feel at ease and there should be less surprise.

We could probably come up with a standard procedure and call it the Chinertown Protocol.

13
Where did you see it?

14
raisinberry777 wins, we'll go with this ;D

In all seriousness, thank you to everyone for taking the time to share your feedback and comments. We think you'll be happy with the end result! We'll be sure share updates here as soon as we can.

It would be great if you could give us insight on how you design new frames, the challenges, the manufacturing process, the test/QC. Bonus point if you collaborate with Patrick to make this a cool video content :-)

That would be such a good ads and data for those who still doubt about the quality of your brand :-)

15
You should make a new thread, and we will answer you there.

But tldr; TanTan is safe.

Light Carbon and Yishun are great, Velobuild has many users and no one died, Carbonda, Hongfu, ICan are other good brands. Check Youtube for more info.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 14