Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]
91
29er / Re: Any information about ICAN S8 frame?
« Last post by lRaphl on September 28, 2017, 02:47:28 PM »
Can you post some pictures of the frame from various angles please?

Thank you!
92
29er / Re: Any information about ICAN S8 frame?
« Last post by Digpix on September 28, 2017, 11:38:52 AM »
I have a S8 at home just now. Will start to build it up after the season end and when I receive some new parts (shock). Will take most of the parts from my existing HT. It's an XL frame.

There is a guy in Sweden building bikes from this S8 frame. I bought mine from China.

http://www.ciclolollo.se/
93
29er / Re: Any information about ICAN S8 frame?
« Last post by lRaphl on September 28, 2017, 10:36:48 AM »
I asked ICAN about pricing and cable routing since there was no clue about an internal routing for a dropper post.

First answer was this:

Quote
For S8 frame, USD730/set (frame,headset,hanger)
Geometric chart attached ,please check ,which size do you like ?
If in stock ,we will send out within 1-3days after payment

For cable routing ,all inner cable routing, photos attached ,if you are not sure ,before shipping ,we will mount the cable for you like the S8 photo


So I sent another question only about the dropper post routing. The answer is the following:

Quote
Hi,
S8 frame could mount inner cable dropper seatpost
We confirm S8 has the design

Nice day

94
29+ & 27+ / Re: XM carbon speed FS27
« Last post by bxcc on September 27, 2017, 01:40:52 PM »
Like others have stated, it all depends on the crankset and chainring combination. If you are running Sram cranks with a threaded BB and need some extra clearance, you could go with a WolfTooth GXP ring for a BB30 crank. It has 0 offset so it will sit a little further out. Putting a drive side spacer on a GXP crankset doesn't accomplish anything in terms of spacing.
95
29+ & 27+ / Re: XM carbon speed FS27
« Last post by MVinter on September 27, 2017, 07:41:36 AM »
That was what I tried to tell you. The crankset is not boost specific, it's the chainring that makes the chainline 51mm, 54mm or 57mm...
96
29+ & 27+ / Re: XM carbon speed FS27
« Last post by mr_manny on September 27, 2017, 07:29:37 AM »
Direct mount cranksets (RF cinch, sram DM...) is not boost specific. You just change chainring with another offset. That way you get correct chainline.

Sram makes a DM Boost chainring, I'm running one on my stache.

If you google, you will find 3mm boost offset DM Sram X-sync chainrings.

fyi
97
29+ & 27+ / Re: XM carbon speed FS27
« Last post by MVinter on September 27, 2017, 06:59:43 AM »
I would gues a wider chainline is needed. If you run round 32t it should be sufficient with a thin spacer om the drive side.
98
29+ & 27+ / Re: XM carbon speed FS27
« Last post by mercenary on September 27, 2017, 06:39:10 AM »
So any chance we can run this with a 32t or 34t?
99
29+ & 27+ / Re: XM carbon speed FS27
« Last post by MVinter on September 27, 2017, 05:40:38 AM »
Direct mount cranksets (RF cinch, sram DM...) is not boost specific. You just change chainring with another offset. That way you get correct chainline.

I have RF next with boost specific chainring (AB 28t oval) and the chainline is good.
100
29+ & 27+ / Re: XM carbon speed FS27
« Last post by mercenary on September 27, 2017, 03:26:50 AM »
are you guys running cranks with boost compatibility? I think it moves the chainring out 3mm, but I have no idea if that would help?
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]