Author Topic: Charles M06 XL build  (Read 873 times)

charlesrg

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 61
    • View Profile
Re: Charles M06 XL build
« Reply #15 on: May 11, 2017, 09:26:07 PM »
The 036 is often speced at 110-120mm of rear travel. Do you feel any difference with the 100mm of the M06 or it seems to have the same amount of travel as the 036?
My IP036 was running on 100mm. The travel on this is the same. The bike is lower to the ground but travel is same. The big difference here is climbing and reduced the rear wheel play.

lRaphl

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 18
    • View Profile
Re: Charles M06 XL build
« Reply #16 on: May 12, 2017, 09:43:19 AM »
Quote from: charlesrg
By the way, I'm running 2.35 tires on it without rub, I think that's as wide as it would take.

Are the Ikon 2.35 true to size?

Quote from: charlesrg
My IP036 was running on 100mm. The travel on this is the same. The bike is lower to the ground but travel is same. The big difference here is climbing and reduced the rear wheel play.

I'm running X-King 2.4 on my 036 (they are true to size) and sometimes when I corner really hard the rear end flex so much that the tire rub on the chainstays. So if the rear of the M06 is stiffer, it's good news.

charlesrg

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 61
    • View Profile
Re: Charles M06 XL build
« Reply #17 on: May 12, 2017, 02:30:21 PM »
Quote from: charlesrg
By the way, I'm running 2.35 tires on it without rub, I think that's as wide as it would take.

Are the Ikon 2.35 true to size?

Quote from: charlesrg
My IP036 was running on 100mm. The travel on this is the same. The bike is lower to the ground but travel is same. The big difference here is climbing and reduced the rear wheel play.


I'm running X-King 2.4 on my 036 (they are true to size) and sometimes when I corner really hard the rear end flex so much that the tire rub on the chainstays. So if the rear of the M06 is stiffer, it's good news.

I think the 036 has larger tire clearance than M06. I will measure take the measurements to ensure it's accurate. I was running 2.35 on the 036 as well with no rub. Keep in mind wheel width also plays a big role on how wide the tire will set.
« Last Edit: May 12, 2017, 10:45:28 PM by charlesrg »

charlesrg

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 61
    • View Profile
Re: Charles M06 XL build
« Reply #18 on: May 12, 2017, 10:44:10 PM »
By the way, while ordering I asked Melody about the bottle cage, and she said not to worry. So I tried to fit a bottle in and the results are in the pictures.
This are my smallest bottles. So no chance using this with a top loader bottle cage. They do work on a side loader but only the small bottles.
I think the bottle cage holes should have been made lower. Sometimes this kinda of failure makes me wonder if they actually ridden any of this frames before started selling.

Klaster_1

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35
    • View Profile
Re: Charles M06 XL build
« Reply #19 on: May 13, 2017, 02:58:24 AM »
I think the bottle cage holes should have been made lower.
Definitely this, my backwards mounted shock barely clears the bottle. Maybe you should try lower sitting cage or a zip tie, like what Steven did.

charlesrg

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 61
    • View Profile
Re: Charles M06 XL build
« Reply #20 on: May 13, 2017, 11:47:35 AM »
I think the bottle cage holes should have been made lower.
Definitely this, my backwards mounted shock barely clears the bottle. Maybe you should try lower sitting cage or a zip tie, like what Steven did.
My solution was to put a side loader bottle cage. That allows for small bottles to fit.