Author Topic: Carbonda FM909  (Read 162377 times)

multig

Re: Carbonda FM909
« Reply #345 on: March 12, 2022, 03:49:43 PM »
Finally i finished my new bike. I bought the first part a year ago, second - 7 month ago, everything else within last 6 months.

Re: Carbonda FM909
« Reply #346 on: March 13, 2022, 03:23:46 PM »
Looks like a fast bike Multig. Weight?

multig

Re: Carbonda FM909
« Reply #347 on: March 14, 2022, 03:54:21 AM »
This build - 10,76 kg.
Witout bottle cages, with regular seatpost limboed under 10. Also change to Schwalbe Ralph / Ron tyres reduce weight for 200-250 gramm.

endo.alley

Re: Carbonda FM909
« Reply #348 on: March 28, 2022, 02:58:23 PM »
Could this bike be used effectively as a cross country racing bike that can maybe double as a marathon racing bike?

dan_cx

Re: Carbonda FM909
« Reply #349 on: March 28, 2022, 04:21:59 PM »
Could this bike be used effectively as a cross country racing bike that can maybe double as a marathon racing bike?

Don't see why it couldn't. It's essentially the 936 with a horizontal vs vertical mount shock. Leverage ratios will be slightly different, due to the 936 being a rocker & the 909 having more of a hanging/swing link, but I doubt it would be a drastic difference. If I hadn't just built a 936, I'd give the 909 a shot for sure.
SRAM Neutral Race Support Mechanic

Pedaldancer

Re: Carbonda FM909
« Reply #350 on: March 29, 2022, 04:10:51 PM »
Now the weather got much better in the last couple of weeks and today I did a longer trip.
The S frame fits two 750ml bottles. Using a sideloader , of course  ;)

I am still not sure if I should lower the front 1cm, but so far it's a good match for me. 
« Last Edit: March 29, 2022, 04:21:50 PM by Pedaldancer »

d3xophen

Re: Carbonda FM909
« Reply #351 on: April 03, 2022, 09:55:26 AM »
Apart from Bombtrack, is there any other OEM brand who use FM909 frame?

bbr

Re: Carbonda FM909
« Reply #352 on: April 03, 2022, 10:19:33 AM »
Kind of interested in this 909. How is it so far in the rear stiffness for those whom are riding this frame?

Wonder if the rear swing arm is laterally stiff if you grab the top side of the rear wheel and seatpost  with push and pull.?

Re: Carbonda FM909
« Reply #353 on: April 05, 2022, 06:13:17 AM »
Had mine finished yesterday. 10,15 kg.

Icyseanfitz

Re: Carbonda FM909
« Reply #354 on: April 05, 2022, 08:14:44 AM »
Love the red, what wheels are those? Boost front and rear?

Re: Carbonda FM909
« Reply #355 on: April 06, 2022, 01:07:04 AM »
Thanks!
The spokes are Bikeahead BiturboRS. Boost converted.

max7373

Re: Carbonda FM909
« Reply #356 on: April 08, 2022, 05:54:02 AM »
What frame size do you recommend at 176cm and a leg length of 81cm? So have shorter legs than average.

I am wavering between S and M. I want to build the bike with a 120mm suspension fork and still ride a sporty position.

I  added the comparison of the geometries. (Screenshots are taken from https://www.bike-stats.de)

Zomb1e

Re: Carbonda FM909
« Reply #357 on: April 08, 2022, 06:15:20 AM »
What frame size do you recommend at 176cm and a leg length of 81cm? So have shorter legs than average.
Normally people with longer torso and/or higher ape index should prefer larger sized frames, while people with longer legs - smaller sized ones. If you are happy with riding position on your current bike, the best way is to measure your bike's RAD (distance from BB center to grips center) and try to achieve the same value on 909 with 35-40mm stem.

max7373

Re: Carbonda FM909
« Reply #358 on: April 08, 2022, 07:51:08 AM »
Quote
If you are happy with riding position on your current bike, the best way is to measure your bike's RAD (distance from BB center to grips center) and try to achieve the same value on 909 with 35-40mm stem.

Hey Zomb1e, thanks for your input. Currently I ride only road bike and cyclocorss, so it is difficult or not possible to transfer these values to a mountain bike, right?

Zomb1e

Re: Carbonda FM909
« Reply #359 on: April 08, 2022, 08:27:04 AM »
Currently I ride only road bike and cyclocorss, so it is difficult or not possible to transfer these values to a mountain bike, right?
Yep, I think it'll be not correct to transfer this value from road bike, but you can try to calculate it using Lee McCormack's and Peter Verdone's methodics. Lee's approach will give you RAD on shorter side, and Peter's one - on longer side. You may choose average of two values as starting point of your mtb fit.