OK I've run out of popcorn! This thread has been read 1830 times. Well played OP. If your mission was to get your message out there, then you've succeeded.
Do I think that threatening to pursue legal action over a defective round seatpost clamp worth $5 is ridiculous? Absolutely.
Do I think this hurts the Winspace brand? Absolutely.
If this happened to me I personally wouldn't at all be upset (you get what you pay for), but IMHO OP has a point (that he's made time and time again in this thread) in regards to how Winspace chooses to deal with issues (which is not at all surprising to me).
I love my bikes, the select parts on my bikes, and the brands that make them. If anything I feel sorry for OP that he owns and rides a bike made by a brand he despises so much.
Fair points, and thanks for actually reading before commenting.
The $5 clamp was never the issue. The real problem is Winspace denying a clear defect and calling it “normal.” I only escalated after they refused to acknowledge it, which is ridiculous for a brand that claims to be premium.
To make things worse, it seems now that Winspace probably knew about the problem all along:
“Both of mine failed within the first couple of weeks of ownership. Roundabout the time I received my frame, there was talk on here of others who also experienced failed clamps; seems there must have been a bad batch.”
If Winspace actually cared about quality or safety, they’d have asked me to send the part back for examination, not he mention a recall / customer information
Also, you wrote “you get what you pay for.” Are you saying Winspace is cheap crap? I could have paid half the price and bought the same frame from Speeder, so at the very least I expect quality control and proper service from Winspace.
So no, I don’t “despise” the bike. I’m just pointing out how poorly the company handled this. If that helps others before buying, then the point is made.