Elves Eglath ARX (all-road)

Started by champagneemontagne, October 29, 2025, 04:19:34 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

champagneemontagne

LAUNCHING DECEMBER 2025 with clearance for 700×38C tyres

Lotnik

That's a nice looking bike. Elves can play colors too. Geometry looks OK. But they should reach 40 mm of clearance as they are some road tires in that size already.

Krupka

Looks like they also provide carbon cranks under their label now.

alexgaignard


bsharp77

Endurance?
That geometry looks way too aggressive.
A top tube of 54.4 is paired with a head tube of 130
to get a decent head tube height, you need to go up to nearly 56 TT - far from endurance geo surely?

McMiGHtY

Can someone tell me what crank it is on the first picture?

HarryFunmaker

Quote from: McMiGHtY on November 01, 2025, 12:16:18 PM
Can someone tell me what crank it is on the first picture?

Looks similar to a Cybrei.

JeffD


tgarne

Quote from: bsharp77 on October 29, 2025, 10:02:15 AM
Endurance?
That geometry looks way too aggressive.
A top tube of 54.4 is paired with a head tube of 130
to get a decent head tube height, you need to go up to nearly 56 TT - far from endurance geo surely?

What do you mean, pretty short reach and really high stack.

At least for my size (58)

klementino

Looks great.

Interesting with even higher stack and lower reach than LightCarbon LCR018-D. At least for size 58. However, this Elves frame has smaller wheelbase and less fork offset when comparing to the LightCarbon frame. Definitely interesting combination.

I wonder what the weight will be for size 58.

konass

Quote from: bsharp77 on October 29, 2025, 10:02:15 AM
Endurance?
That geometry looks way too aggressive.
A top tube of 54.4 is paired with a head tube of 130
to get a decent head tube height, you need to go up to nearly 56 TT - far from endurance geo surely?

I would look at stack, not head tube length. 570 definitely seems in the right territory in a M/54ish frame.

TurboKlemi

#11
Front center is a bit too short. Toe overlap is certain. But that seat tube angle looks bad. 73° across all sizes?  ??? Who wants that? If the seatpost is round I could remedy that by mounting and flipping an offset seatpost.

Quote from: klementino on November 02, 2025, 02:38:17 AM
Looks great.

Interesting with even higher stack and lower reach than LightCarbon LCR018-D. At least for size 58. However, this Elves frame has smaller wheelbase and less fork offset when comparing to the LightCarbon frame. Definitely interesting combination.

I wonder what the weight will be for size 58.
Remember that LCR018-D has 8mm of rise in handlebars so stack is about the same. I might get this one over the LC one if the weight is at least 100g less and if the seatpost is round.

Takiyaki

Quote from: bsharp77 on October 29, 2025, 10:02:15 AM
Endurance?
That geometry looks way too aggressive.
A top tube of 54.4 is paired with a head tube of 130
to get a decent head tube height, you need to go up to nearly 56 TT - far from endurance geo surely?
I think they used a taller fork to get more tire clearance. I judge a frame's "endurance" by the TT vs stack. If stack > TT in a ~54cm size it's prob gonna be more comfortable. Truthfully though, this is within range of a regular road bike though

Hualicopter

I'm guessing it's gonna cost quite a bit more than the Lightcarbon though.

hugovl

Not sure why it says endurance in the Topic title.
Elves clearly mark it as an all-road performance bike on their Australian website.

The cost for the frameset is EUR 1140,-