Author Topic: AEROSCOOP!!!! by Cinelli  (Read 3394 times)

patliean1

AEROSCOOP!!!! by Cinelli
« on: November 15, 2025, 06:55:26 AM »
Is it a Seka Spear? (Original design) TanTan X67? We already know the Cinelli Pressure is an ICAN A40 frameset.

https://www.instagram.com/p/DREqNLDjDge/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link&igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==

bigApple

Re: AEROSCOOP!!!! by Cinelli
« Reply #1 on: November 15, 2025, 09:13:03 AM »
ODM from Lightcarbon i would guess  ::)

toxin

Re: AEROSCOOP!!!! by Cinelli
« Reply #2 on: November 15, 2025, 09:40:22 AM »
it is indeed a similarly bad implementation of wind-eye as lightcarbon's

Dareios

Re: AEROSCOOP!!!! by Cinelli
« Reply #3 on: November 15, 2025, 12:50:06 PM »
ODM from Lightcarbon i would guess  ::)
That was also my guess, slightly altered seattube shape to make it look more like the Scott Foil one, but otherwise it looks exactly like the Lightcarbon one. This one apparently testing at 205W in the Tour magazine test (with favourable wheels and tires, tbh) is funny, as it demonstrates how overrated big names are when it comes to decent aero performance.

ksw392

Re: AEROSCOOP!!!! by Cinelli
« Reply #4 on: November 16, 2025, 07:17:05 AM »
TT-X38 + LCR018 = AEROSCOOP

HarryFunmaker

Re: AEROSCOOP!!!! by Cinelli
« Reply #5 on: November 16, 2025, 09:04:12 AM »
I had a good laugh when I saw this on Bikerumor. Lightcarbon was the first thing that came to my mind, and they are charging a ridiculous price for it. Does anyone really care that much about the Cinelli name these days?

Sakizashi

Re: AEROSCOOP!!!! by Cinelli
« Reply #6 on: November 16, 2025, 10:33:30 AM »
This frame will be pretty competitive in price... once the inevitable steep discounting kicks in.

I highly doubt Lightcarbon makes these. TopCarbon made previous Pressure and Pressure 2 frames, and Cinelli/Columbus is big enough volume-wise to go to one of the bigger factories if they want. The other thing is that the LCR-018 seems to have a cleaner execution of the wind eye shape than Cinelli Aeroscoop...so...not sure why they would do worse for a relatively big client.