See likes

See likes given/taken


Your posts liked by others

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
Post info No. of Likes
Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
When I stripped this down to do the 200hr service on the shock is when I found this. All bearings appeared fine so far as I could tell. I didn't see anything out of the ordinary when checking it. Is there anything in particular I should look for when checking the bearings? They were all seated appropriately, no sticky points, nothing grimy... etc. The swingarm mounts appropriately as well, once again, so far as I could tell.

Seems fine then...grimy and sticky could be an issue...but if its smooth...
The shock itself pivots fine also? If this could happen when everything else is running smooth, I would not ask Adam foe a replacement...it wil be the same quality. My 2ct

February 15, 2021, 02:14:43 PM
1
Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
Hi guys, I wanted to know if the bike easily accepts the entire 165 * 42'5 shock travel. I ask this because there are bicycles that, although they accept 115mm of travel, it is very difficult to get them to give the full travel. I don't know if I explain myself well, since my native language is not English.

I have a 42.5mm shock..rs deluxe and with 25% sag it uses 80-90% of its travel..first i did 30% sag which did use full travel, but not that often... Less tsag means less pedalstrikes (in flat terrain with a lot of turns).

Hope it helps

February 16, 2021, 05:08:04 AM
1
Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
Max. pressure for DT535 is 333 psi. So yes, 300 is quite a lot. But i used about 75% travel on my first ride, wich was pretty careful because of the slippery ground. When i gain some confidence and ride harder, there is not much room for lower pressure.
I started with 25 % sag on the first checkout ride. That was way too bouncy for me, felt like using 50% travel when riding an even asphalt road.
Rebound is at 11 from 22 clicks.

Bouncy rides means wrong setting in my opinion... To fast rebound or/and to less sag.... Using 50% travel on tarmac says nothing...depends on shock etc... If you're using your travel to fast, think of using volumespacers

February 18, 2021, 02:38:16 PM
1
Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
I ordered it from Carbonda - like $15 shipped.  Mainly ordered it because I was afraid I was gonna strip my bolt head out as well trying to get it tight enough, mine would spin too when tightened to almost the point of stripping.  I could feel the movement in the pivot still if I squeezed the non-drive crank arm against the chainstay and put my finger on the pivot.  Once I shortened that pivot pin like Adam suggested it fully tightened with ease and didn't spin and most importantly didn't creak anymore.

I do so hope you're right...I was so fedup about it...I allmost ordered a tranition spur frameset ::)

February 23, 2021, 03:58:59 PM
2
Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
That was what I had as well, about 83mm.  Filed mine down to almost 80mm I think and that did it for me.

Put it back together and yes the play was gone and the bolt was tightened easely! But I can feel a sharp edge at the inside of the spot where the bolt was sitting...I'm afraid it sanded through the carbon..so send Adam a question about it...would like to get a new rear because of it.

February 24, 2021, 01:09:09 PM
1
Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
Any 182cm/6' folks on large frames, what size dropper have you installed?

Can't tell because I'm on a medium frame...but the answer is quitte simpele: the biggest which you can fit in your frame!
Oneup has the one's with the smallest inbuild height and can be adjusted.
The cheapest are from x brand/tranzx, which I use without issues for 1.5 years now.

Good luck

April 08, 2021, 12:00:03 AM
1
Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
Go with the 40. 42.5 gets nothing more than a risk to the warranty. I wonder if the cracks referenced to the rear triangle are due to running a 42.5.

I think this is bs...lots of us use the 42.5 without any issues!
Same frame is used by several other resellers also with 42.5/110mm travel.

So would go with 42.5. rs deluxe can somethimes be found for nice price.

June 09, 2021, 02:44:46 PM
1
Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
You are running both 120 and 42.5 right? Any Idea on how much sag you run? The difference to pedal striker may either be running to much sag or you running 100 and 40MM

I ride with the same lenght fork and shock. Front is 20% sag (DVO sapphire, trail fork), rear 27-30% with a RS deluxe rct.
Never lock it. pedalstrikes zero to none with a 170mm crank that is (and is the way to go with the DC bikes which are long slack and low).

Good luck!

PS already biked >8000km with mine, done 2 transalps and serveral alp days even on EWS trails... still loving it.

July 17, 2022, 02:01:09 PM
2
Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts Moet likely your hanger is bend. And no way it's because of your 1x drivetrain.
Other thing I had: you have to check how you did the cable at your derrailer!

No way I will ever go back to 2x or 3x drivetrain...like going back to horse and wagon.

August 07, 2022, 05:22:06 AM
1
Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
Just a heads up for those interes

I was really hoping for a 909DC rather than 936DC, as the dirt is so fine and so much of it here, that it's like riding powdery snow on some trails.  I've decided high horizontal rear shock mount is definitely the way to go.

InMy opinion it doesn't really matter where the shock is. Dirt will find its way. But after riding the 936 for 2 years now I can say the shock won't be dirty, but there will be a pile up of dirt below it, in the space for the trunnion mount.
The onely reason to have a vertical shock is space for 2 bottles...thats it!

My2c

Good lich with the 909.

August 21, 2022, 11:57:20 PM
1