Chinese Carbon MTB Forums
News:
Happy Holidays!
See likes
See likes given/taken
| Post info | No. of Likes |
|---|---|
Re: Lightcarbon: LCR018-D (endurance all-road)
from quick glance it looks like the geometry is very close to the ENVE Fray, looking forward to this bike. I just wish it was coming out this summer. Fits perfectly in the category of (and how it compares in a size 58): -Envee Fray (is slightly higher, rest close to identical) -Canyon Endurace (is slighty shorter and higher, slightly sharper headtube=>snappier steering yet less stable) -Cervelo Caledonia (Reach and stack identical, slightly blunter headtube=>stable steering yet less snappy) -BMC Roadmachine (slightly higher,slightly blunter headtube=>stable steering yet less snappy) BB drop also all in the range of 3mm on all these bikes. Wheelbase also all in a 2.5% range with the LC in the middle of the range. Front center ratio is between 40.2% to 41.3% with the LC in the middle of the range with 40.7% Seems like a road bike for the people. Not a thoroughbred race bike Not a thoroughbred endurance bike June 25, 2025, 05:12:19 AM |
1 |
Re: Seraph Bikes Superlight 836g X68 - Alternative to SL8 Fakes?
Something different. Ali Trek style aero bottles on an x68. Stock they're grey and black. Might need an accent or graphic on the bottle but they look good. They function well, just wish they had a normal pull open spout. 
August 16, 2025, 03:05:53 PM |
1 |
|
Re: Seraph Bikes Superlight 836g X68 - Alternative to SL8 Fakes?
Nice bars! I was debating those also but went with the T4 bc I really like the no external clamp bolts around the steerer. BTW the T4 does have 3 bolts for computer mount but its two below and one out front.
September 04, 2025, 12:40:18 PM |
1 |
Re: Lightcarbon: LCR018-D (endurance all-road)
I am too in the process of thinking about buying one, but one part of me think I should wait for Hambini/Tracevelo quality check (they have not announced it, I just reckon they will based on their enthusiasm). But on the other hand, it seems to me that Lightcarbon in general is known for good quality - eg the other Lightcarbon frame that Mondraker bought rights to. So maybe there really is no gamble associated with buying this frame right away. 1) Because I don't trust all (most of) reviews at all ^^ 2) When brands send some frames to some youtubers, they always double check the frame but may not do this for casual customers 3) The frame thick a lot of box 4) I am a scientist so I like to take some risk 5) I have a good dentist  6) LC is well known even if they have some troubles with some frames 7) I plan to make a long review of the frame from the unboxing to the ride. September 14, 2025, 10:17:33 AM |
1 |
Re: Lightcarbon: LCR018-D (endurance all-road)
Did you try this? I build bikes for a team and various clients. It’s an easy way to get a base line or confirm changes for those who aren’t sure what size etc. They have a free version which is pretty basic but far better than the general guessing I see going on repeatedly on this thread. I have no clue why so many people on here put so little effort into choosing the correct frame size. It’s lazy. The whole hight and inseam measurements are just bullshit for finding the correct size frame. February 14, 2026, 01:28:32 AM |
1 |
|
Re: Lightcarbon: LCR018-D (endurance all-road)
I think the conclusion is only partially correct — LightCarbon does actually publish parts of their testing protocol: https://www.lightcarbon.com/testing-process_n23 From that page we know their stiffness tests are based on lateral deflection under load (N/mm), with defined lever arms (~250 mm head tube, ~260 mm BB) and minimum thresholds (100 N/mm head / 120 N/mm BB). So the values are grounded in real structural testing — not purely marketing. However, direct comparison with Roadbike magazine (or other labs) is still problematic because stiffness numbers depend heavily on fixture design, load position, and measurement method. Even using the same unit, different protocols can produce very different absolute values. Most likely the published LC figures (117 / 185) are normalized indices derived from internal N/mm measurements — useful for comparing LC frames internally, but not 1:1 vs other brands. February 19, 2026, 04:52:35 AM |
1 |
