See likes given/taken
Post info | No. of Likes |
---|---|
Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
Riding a 42.5 shock I can tell you the chance of having isseus is minimal. Rode a bikepark!! with this bike without problems. Even cleared a jump of several meters! Did also some enduro tracks in the Dolomites(Italien Alps) as xc biking there and it was great. Better than last years biking with a canyon nerve; better going up and way better going down. My2c Pics July 20, 2020, 04:01:52 AM |
1 |
Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
Magura brakes are my go to, Shimano second. Sram brakes I will never use again. July 29, 2020, 05:01:42 PM |
1 |
Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
My frame arrived!love it! You have balls! clearance seem to be very small, but should be fine I guess. Will also run the 42.5 and try not to bottom out. I'm not a true XC rider with all that jumping. Just wanne have a very smooth riding fast bike with which I can ride in the woods and on the streets and on gravel. August 04, 2020, 01:59:12 AM |
1 |
Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
My frame arrived!That one will get noticed, for sure I'm not that worried about the 42.5mm anymore. From the other's feedback first. And even on a jump, the force to flex the pivot/shock/BB fixture should be enormous for the triangle to go farther than your picture. August 04, 2020, 05:15:28 AM |
1 |
Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
My frame arrived! Great color! I didn't go with paint but next time I am going with something LOUD August 04, 2020, 03:55:49 PM |
1 |
Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
Thanks man!Did anyone of you painted the UD carbon black in shiny clear coat? I wonmder if this looks good on a XC race bike or it should be better matt black I'm 95% ready with my paint job design! Just the final details are missing. I'll post a link to my build thread on German forum soon. August 24, 2020, 01:09:07 PM |
1 |
Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
Yes it is, it is working perfectly. Looking back at the thread it looks like one person was not so lucky. I deflated it all the way and bounced on it while someone watched the gap behind the seat. It was close but it wouldnt budge no matter how hard I bounced on the empty shock. As long as you order the SL version, I bet it will be fine. If you look back in the thread you will notice most of the quality control issues were not with the SL version. I have the same shock on my Standard size L and I have 1cm clearance at full compression. I'll get a caliper and measure it with a pic and upload it. What pressure are you running in the shock? I'm 70kg and at around 250 PSI. Thanks October 20, 2020, 06:22:56 AM |
1 |
Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
Quote Low bb didnt notice at all with 170 cranks! I was going down deep railway sleeper stairs on the trail and didnt notice a too low feeling Quote I also don't think the low BB is very noticeable. Not a big deal, has its advantages. The low BB is the thing that stands out the most to me out of the geometry of this frame. I guess it all depends on the type of trails you ride. On my home trails (natural desert trails, loads of rocks and off-camber technical singletrack...nothing is groomed), pedal strikes are far more than the two other bikes I ride most frequently (2017 Cannondale Scalpel and a Titus Fireline with a 120mm fork...neither is known for a particularly high BB) and that's with 170mm crank arms. Love this frame, but I dare not run the 936 with a 100mm fork where I ride seeing how low it is with 120mm. October 20, 2020, 05:40:14 PM |
1 |
Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
The low BB is the thing that stands out the most to me out of the geometry of this frame. I guess it all depends on the type of trails you ride. On my home trails (natural desert trails, loads of rocks and off-camber technical singletrack...nothing is groomed), pedal strikes are far more than the two other bikes I ride most frequently (2017 Cannondale Scalpel and a Titus Fireline with a 120mm fork...neither is known for a particularly high BB) and that's with 170mm crank arms. Love this frame, but I dare not run the 936 with a 100mm fork where I ride seeing how low it is with 120mm. Agreed on the BB here. I originally had a 100mm stepcast on mine and the BB was ridiculously low and I was having strikes every ride even with 170mm cranks - hard strikes. Swapped the fork to a 120mm stepcast just because of the strikes and that cleared up 90% of those for me. As an added bonus I feel like the bike actually steers and handles better now as well. As info: 100mm was 44 offset and the 120mm is 51 offset. October 20, 2020, 08:41:43 PM |
1 |
Re: FM1166 - 150mm frame
Linkage Check - Carbon frame from Flybike l Modern geometry and good kinematics? l FM1166 https://insanityofgravity.blogspot.com/2020/11/6-linkage-check-carbon-rahmen-von.html January 14, 2021, 03:40:51 AM |
1 |