Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - numberzero

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9
106
29+ & 27+ / LCFS711
« on: December 11, 2018, 08:16:35 AM »
Hello is someone using the lightcarbon or yishun LCFS711 : https://www.lightcarbon.com/lightcarbon-650b-cross-country-mountain-bike-frame_p40.html, i will be pleased to here your reviews.

I'm thinking of building a trail 29er (120 or 130mm travel) with this frame, as it supposed to be compatible with 650+ (650x2.8) it should be compatible with 29er too.


107
29er / Re: 29er frame which fits 27.5+ tires?
« on: November 29, 2018, 01:19:01 AM »
Why not searching a 27,5+ frame which for sure will fit 29"?

108
29er / Re: XC Rocket or Trail Slayer?
« on: November 15, 2018, 01:07:04 AM »
You have two very different frames in suspension design.

Promance is like spark/scalpel... with a single pivot design and flex in the rear triangle. More sporty feeling i think.

Workswell is a 4 bar linkage, like the old specialized epic for instance. This design is supposed to be more responsive on small bumps but also more on pedal bob.

109
29er / Re: FM 289 from Hong Fu with boost
« on: September 04, 2018, 02:45:43 AM »
Check this one https://fr.lightcarbon.com/lightweight-new-boost-carbon-mtb-bike-frameset_p42.html#parentHorizontalTab022
Geometry is given for 490 fork. With fully extended fork HTA comes to 69° and you probably lose 0,5cm of reach.
I think it's pretty close to the santacruz except RC which is a bit too long.

110
29er / Re: Workswell WCB-M-062
« on: May 04, 2018, 03:49:02 AM »
My BB shell is now creaking, too... I contacted Workswell and they offered me to send me a new BB shell and some glue.
With workswell customer has to repair his frame by itself? Do they sent you carbon sheet and resin if frame breaks?


111
29er / Re: Leadnovo bikes
« on: April 30, 2018, 06:44:13 AM »
Geometry is a bit oldschool and awkward, steep HA (71,5 in 19" is crazy), reach is really short, chainstays too long... who wants a MTB like this nowadays?
Good point is that rear triangle is probably very confortable with flatten chainstays and seatstays.

If you want to do gravel roads with 120mm stem it's a good frame, if you want something fun on trails go away.

112
29er / Re: Bhaalgorn's "Budget" CS-057 Build
« on: January 12, 2018, 01:40:15 PM »
Take care with your stem.
One guy on a french forum had the same and his handlebar was moving by 4 to 5 cm on the extremity due do the lack of stiffness of this carbon stem.

113
29er / Re: 29er HT Choices: CS-218, CS-887-SL, MB01 or LCM904
« on: December 17, 2017, 01:20:10 AM »
I had this one http://www.lightcarbon.com/mtb_hardtail-14-29er-mtb-hardtail-light-carbon-frame-lcm903. Relatively long geometry but oldschool headangle (71°).
Flat seat stays made the frame comfortable and very responsive at the same time.
It's a good choice for flat, but less capable on steep or fast descents than new school slackened frames.

114
29er / Re: Chinertown's Holiday Giveaway!
« on: November 20, 2017, 02:05:52 AM »
My favorite brand is yishun because i had good contacts with them.
If i had to buy a fame today it will be the Ican GRAVEL BIKE FRAME GRA02.

115
29er / Re: Choosing the right m062 frame size
« on: November 18, 2017, 09:36:29 AM »
I don't have the reach numbers for my frame. Is it possible to measure it?

That's a bummer if it's to small
I use the same technique described here :http://www.velonews.com/2012/05/bikes-and-tech/technical-faq/technical-faq-setting-your-bikes-up-identically_216035#


116
29er / Re: Choosing the right m062 frame size
« on: November 18, 2017, 06:16:19 AM »
TT is linked to seat tube angle and it's not appropriate to use it alone.
If you want to replicate your position look at reach and stack then you'll know which stem to put. You can potentially be well positionned on each size playing on stem lenght/angulation and seat post lenght/setback but your bike won't handle the same.
HA and WB reflect the way the bike will handle and have nothing to do with positionning.

117
29er / Re: shifting problems CS-057
« on: November 16, 2017, 01:13:31 AM »
Or you can run full housing, by drilling the ends.
I did that on most of my frames, but never had a 057.

I did the same on my previous frame. Shifting was not good when i used the housing from the factory, i drilled, removed it and putted a full length housing from shifter to derailleur, problem solved.

118
29er / Re: looking for a frame with modern geometry
« on: November 11, 2017, 10:00:40 AM »
The Workswell WCB-M-145 looks pretty interesting. No Boost, but it has a 68 deg HTA. The reach on a medium is decently long at 428mm for a 100mm travel bike. The reach on my medium Workswell 062 is 414mm.

http://www.workswellbikes.com/PRODDUCT/MTB/Trail/20170809/153.html
Did you ask workswell about it, any availability?
They have no real pictures and nobody else is selling so it seems to be a project in development.

119
29er / Re: 29er "Trail" travel suspension (120 - 130mm) frames
« on: September 25, 2017, 04:59:47 AM »
69° head angle with a 150mm fork is not what can be called "trail". It's all like they wanted to keep a short enough wheelbase because of the huge chainstay 457mm :-\

For me geometry is really bad, i won't buy this...

120
29er / Re: Full Suspension WCB-M-108 / LCFS902 / CS-821 Experience?
« on: May 22, 2017, 08:08:44 AM »
Ok thanks, i'm thinking about testing a debonair.
About air pressure with this frame i'm riding between 25 and 30% SAG, my conclusion is that going less than 25 is not good.

By the way you should protect your bottom bracket from cable rubbing or you'll get the carbon digged soon, especially by your rear derailleur cable.

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9