Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - badIuck

Pages: 1 [2]
16
Road Bike Frames, Wheels & Components / Re: Velobuild VB-R-168 Frame
« on: November 10, 2022, 02:41:01 PM »
Is anyone able to identify if the Airwolf YFR066 frameset uses the same integrated handlebars as you guys are receiving with your VB-168?
If it is the same I would order the frameset with handlebar since it seems to be relatively proven at this point. Otherwise I'll mount something else..

https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005004256426343.html?spm=a2g0o.productlist.0.0.683f5695nXglt0&algo_pvid=04288e28-5070-4aad-a381-679c4b7a5ab0&algo_exp_id=04288e28-5070-4aad-a381-679c4b7a5ab0-0&pdp_ext_f=%7B%22sku_id%22%3A%2212000028593785264%22%7D&pdp_npi=2%40dis%21EUR%21790.64%21553.44%21%21%21%21%21%402100bddd16681124421354799e5ff5%2112000028593785264%21sea&curPageLogUid=V84hYRoVS5pk

Thans in avance!

17
Looks like I should go with the rf22 although I think the 168 looks a bit nicer. But 34mm Pro One on 24mm inner width rims is a bit too close for comfort..
Thanks again for the help!

18
Road Bike Frames, Wheels & Components / Re: Velobuild VB-R-168 Frame
« on: November 04, 2022, 04:39:08 PM »
I have a couple of road races coming up with significant amounts of gravel sections, so I have been trying to maximize the tire space in the frame. The split for one race is around 15% tame gravel/85% asphalt and 45% tame gravel / 55% asphalt for the other.
I have been looking for high volume road tyres with lower rolling resistance compared to gravel tires.

I currently have Vittoria Terreno Zero's in 32c and they are very puncture resistant but noticeably slower than a road tire (as it probably should be). Very good if there is a high risk of punctures or a need for more grip.

Schwalbe have a 34c model of their Pro One Evo TLE which I picked up. I mounted them on Light Bicycle WR45's which are 25mm internal (hooked). They measure 33,5mm.

Surprisingly there is still a bit of space. Obviously they are narrower than advertised but it probably also has to do with the lack of knobs and that the wide rim gives the tire a lower profile.
I would say if you have wide rims the bike could probably handle a 35mm WAM slick tire if you can live with minimal mud clearance. Anyone wanna sponser me some Rene Herse Bon Jon Pass  ;D ?
How did the 34c Schwalbes work out for you on the 168? I got some feedback that 34-35mm actual width would be real tight/rubbing from @kbike and @patliean1 but then there are guys like you where it seems to be fine. Pretty confusing...

19
Thanks for the quick feedback. Some more pictures would be really great. I wish there was something like a Cervelo Caledonia or the new Sarto Raso. Aero shape/road bike look and geometry with 35mm tire clearance. I don't think something like that exists from the chinese direct sales manufacturers.
I like to use Schwalbe Pro One 34mm (actual 34.5mm) for everything from smooth pavement to gravel. I wish I could have a road bike with those tires and not a gravel bike even though the differences between road and gravel frames are small...

20
I ordered from cwind. They responded to me when I asked about not offering the 7x9 clamp.

They say read the packing list not the pictures.  They say the pictures only show that 7x9 option is possible not offered.

I ordered the 7x9 clamps that look like bottle caps. They are to large and will not fit inside the seatpost. There are 7x9 clamps I think will work but will not post links for overly priced products.

For right now the frame can only do 7x7 imo.

There is no tire clearance issues for the fd.

cr060 vbr168 rf22 compared

The cr060 is more relaxed gravel position.

The rf22 has a longer top tube than the vbr168 but less setback on the seatpost.

Hey, can you measure the actual width of the 32c gp5000 on yourVB 168 and the 38c Gravelkings on the rf22? How much clearance is there left?
Trying to decide between those frames and looking to run tires measuring in at 34-35mm actual width. I would prefer the 168 because of the lower fork and cleaner looks. I am afraid the rf22 might have quite large gaps at the seat tube and fork with 34mm tires which I dont really like aesthatically.

Pages: 1 [2]