Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - BikeRxeady

#1
With a couple upgrades
1. BB - Wolftooth
2. UDH Direct Mount
3. Tires - Challenge Clincher 300Tpi Tan Wall
4. Saddle - Specialized Romin Carbon
5. Pedals - Assioma

Weight = 7.15KG as in picture
#2
Since the frame is UDH - Will a standard UDH - Shimano Direct mount RD hangar work ?
Im in USA and a have a reseller account with Wheels manufacturing

https://wheelsmfg.com/products/derailleur-hanger-562

#3
Quote from: Sander2177 on September 09, 2026, 11:42:23 AM

Yes I was told they are supplied.
I personally did not get one with my ER One.
I bought a Sixweel UDH Direct mount hanger for Shimano

Do you have a link to sixweel  RD hangar
#4
Is there a direct mount Shimano RD for this QP ER or UR or AR frames or
#5
Hence my question and request for recommendations from experience
#6
Has anyone used or can recommend a light seatpost clamp ?? 

saw these on AE / any reviews or recommendations please post

#8
There are many sellers on AliExp... for UNO stems  I am looking for AS025 specifically /  Any sellers you know has that stem ???

TIA
#9
Prefer in the range of 140gm (300mm)
any recommendations ??? 
#10
The test is wrong thats not how  the axle is mounted on the frame and the loading is not only shear.
The weakest interaction is the carbon to aluminum joint i guarantee you if the  support is captive on both ends like on the bike the failure loads will be much lower.

WILL WAIT FOR LONG TERM INUSE  ISSUES.
#11
Quote from: gplama on January 14, 2026, 06:07:48 PM
Boom. There it is on the XCadey, cadence sensing issues in peak power acceleration/sprints. I'd consider that in-line with my testing scope. And unfortunately for XCadey, in-line with my results.

I have talked to xcadey for months about the calibration and try to improve their discrepancies with power.  What they dont understand is that to be accurate there are a minimum of 3 pts in calibrations is needed not just 1
My explanation is
Power = Torque x "rpm" 
Torque from sensor is accurate but its assumed a linear relations ship [ Y=mX+C ]  where C is the offset at zero - That is the calibration number....  And m (slope) is fixed at the factory and its fairly accurate but when manufacturing deviates a tad that "m" is off and cannot be changed -  Thats why i propose a 2 point calibration (like the old Quarq) by placing a known weight to get the 2nd point.
now for cadence where the biggest issue with new power meters that dont use a magnet for rpm... the rpm can be all over the place and delayed and if using the peak of the sensor and average the time between a small amount of peaks that is problematic.....

I gave up trying to explain my case to them
#12
I have 2 powermeters from xcadey and it has been trouble free but the calibration is not accurate but repeatable .... if you use it to get your FTP and use that number than its not an issue.  the offset is not correct.
#13
Component Deals & Selection / Re: Lexon Warranty?
December 29, 2025, 10:55:29 AM
i have 3 lexon bars and will be installing the 4th one next week.
Where did your bars crack at ?  and how did it happen ?
Post pics ...
#14
i like to continue using my DA cage but like larger pulleys (larger than 12/14)
TIA
#15
Quote from: pavlo.k on April 22, 2025, 01:14:36 AM
It looks like you are looking for a 24mm axle option? Look through the Lexon crankset thread. People seem to have lots of issues with this design. I wanted to get 24mm version as well but ended up buying dub version from Leese and swapping the BB
Please share link