Quote from: Requiem84 on November 04, 2026, 01:46:17 PMI wouldn't fret about it, with 46 you should be quite decent. 48 can fit too if you really need it. Probably takes 2 or 3mm of spacers (or go Transmission with the much wider chain line).

When you're mentioning using spacers, are they additional spacers than the one Sram uses when running their Wide Xplr crankset (2.5mm on left side and 5.5mm on the right side for T47 85.5 BB)? I'm planning on running the recommended setup from Sram with these spacers to have the wider 47.5mm chainline which I assume will enable me to run at least 48T in the front (I'll have the updated frame).

Quote from: RLA on October 29, 2026, 05:38:28 AMGRT's reach is a little bit longer than on any of my previous gravel/CX bikes so I'm on the opposite side. Will be using slightly shorter stem (110 -> 100) on this to get similar fit. Everyone is different but to me as well the GRT geometry seems to be the sweet spot.

I'd be be careful sizing down your stem as the integrated cockpit has quite a short reach at 72mm. I was using a 110mm stem on my Crux with a 79mm reach aero bar and although the GRT was 7mm longer than the Crux, the shorter reach handlebar compensated for the reach difference and went with the same 110mm stem integrated cockpit. I've yet to receive the frame and cockpit so let's hope I didn't mess up 

Quote from: Eddy_Twerckx on October 28, 2026, 11:56:46 AMMan if the reach were a touch longer it would be the perfect bike. But it's way too short unfortunately. Any other options with similar geo (but longer) and 2x compatibility?

The reach is already quite long when looking at other western bike such as Specialized Crux at 395 (size M) vs a size 54 Crux (388)...It's not as long as some other gravel bike but it's not on the short side either. Finding 2x modern gravel race bike with good tire clearance is pretty much impossible these day.

Hi all,

I was wondering if there's been any review on this frameset yet? I was told that production on the size 54 would start in November but perhaps someone was lucky enough to ride a pre-production frame? I'm torn between the XMCS VRT and the LCR020. I already have a XMCS GRT on order so I'm a little bias towards XMCS (amazing client services) and have no doubt the VRT is great but I like the tubing shape on the LC and the pricing is a little better.

Quote from: edfungus on October 15, 2026, 01:16:18 AM
Here are photos from this weekend. Its clear coat with red in the front and just clear in the back. Peter also sent me this instagram which is also my bike with a better look at the color: https://www.instagram.com/reels/DdeQt3uSkRy/

A few question. First, how does the bike ride? Are you running Dubs in 50c (2.0) or the 2.2 - Curious to know how you like them as I'm running Tufo Thundero in 48c on my Crux but would like to run either the 2.0 or 2.2 on my GRT. Any issue when building the bike or things I should know as I'll be buying tools to assemble it myself, would be my first build so any tips is welcomed! Great looking bike by the way, can't wait for mine to arrive later this fall!

Thanks for the answer on the downtube protector. I'll probably just go 3M protective tape on both the downtube and chainstay, not a big deal. Are you guys running 160mm rotors front and rear?

Quote from: edfungus on October 09, 2026, 04:37:25 PM
ok first ride (short, mostly road) thoughts:

- surprisingly smooth especially coming from an aspero with an ergon split seatpost (tho at max insertion)
- handles well however was twitchier than I was expecting. Should have been +2 trail but felt -2 trail. Running 40mm that inflates to 44mm. Wouldn't say bad just unexpected (I went 170mm -> 160mm cranks which could have contributed, feels a little different)
- feels like I'm more on the bike rather than in the bike compared to the aspero

other notes:
- no chainstay protector
- fork seems fully tubed for hose (or I got super lucky)
- no dummy hanger plate for 1x
- 4mm (not 5mm) bolts on handlebar for computer mount
- shockingly was able to fit the silca gravelero pump into the storage with ease. I was certain that it would be too long but its not!

The twitchy front end is a little concerning but perhaps it's something that is easy to get used to. Looking at the geometry, it looks to have around 65mm of trail which would actually be 3mm more than your Aspero so it should feel less twitchy when looking only at the numbers. I assume there's no downtube protector also? Thanks for sharing your first impressions

Quote from: edfungus on October 08, 2026, 03:55:51 PM
Ran into a snag on size S frame/fork. I cut the fork slammed for only the 12mm headset and the expander plug is too long. There is a ridge on the inside before a not smooth section 40mm from the top. The plug is 50mm. I think if you have a 10mm spacer + the 12mm you will be fine. I'll have to go get a shorter expander plug. Shouldn't affect most except those slamming a size small

The inside of the steerer tube looks rough Maybe it's the angle or something. I'm planning on slamming the stem so hopefully on my Medium I'll be able to use the provided expander plug. Have you check with XMCS if the ridge inside is normal? I feel like they would would like your feedback on this issue as they could fix it in the future.

Just ordered mine yesterday. Went for a custom two-tone color scheme that should look like the attached image. Very excited to see the final product!!!!

Quote from: edfungus on October 06, 2026, 11:16:54 PM
My frame finally came in! Ordered end of July. I know people are eager for photos/details.

Weights:
- Frame (S, clear coat only, with 2 additional bolt holes bottom of downtube) - 1096g (no bolt, hangers, axle, storage door, etc)
- Fork uncut - 471g
- Handlebars (flared gravel 38cm x 100mm) - 360g
- Seatpost with hardware - 181g
- Storage door - 46g (with 2 bolts)
- Axles - 64g

Frame and fork looks wonderful! Finish looks good too. XMCS logos on the bolts are a nice touch. The storage door is matte and plastic but feels rigid enough. I requested bolt holes under the downtube as well. This is also the 46t max frame.

Some nitpicks, there is no manual included which would be nice but its pretty straight forward. The bars where the shifters mount measured closer to 39cm than 38cm. The bar sizes are measured from the top. The flare also start from the top into the bend so probably add 1cm to the width to get the width at mount point.

Will be building it soon. Coming from an Aspero. Will probably run the same WG44 Lightbicycle wheels with 40cm Caracal Race first for comparison then 2.2 Dubnitals later. Let me know if people have questions (sorry I don't have a front derailleur )

I just ordered mine and seeing the finish on the frame, looks very promising! Quick question, any idea what those 2 large silver washers are for?

Quote from: Bobinski on October 03, 2026, 09:56:06 AM
I am waiting for mine. I am sure it will ride well, perhaps even great. FWIW, Its as near to an Enve mog whilst possible a tad more aero. My experience of wheels and cranks from Peter is enough for me to spend a bit more over the other options.

Thanks reassuring. Speaking of wheels, I'm debating whether the extra 330USD is worth it for the 32.5 inner XCMS wheels with carbon spoke when compared to ICAN G30.

Quote from: ElRey on October 02, 2026, 11:29:55 AM
Mine's on the way...

Do you know when it's suppose to arrive? I've yet to buy mine for the October production but would love some additional feedback before committing. Looks great on paper and I have a sick paint job secured but the GRT is not exactly cheap when factoring shipping and taxes/duties so I hope it rides well beside looking great!

Is there any current owner of the GRT that could share their frame color? I'm trying to figure out what color I should select for my next build? Still unsure if I go with the GRT or the Cima GR at this time, I'm really bummed out by the actual tire clearance of the Cima compared to the GRT.

I have to say that I now looking into the XM Carbonspeed GRT frame as a potential alternative to the Cima GR...Looks to be a similar price with shipping and everything added up and it looks less polished than the Cima (plus 400g heavier overall, if not more when included the cockpit) but it looks like a well designed and aero frame with tons of clearance and a modern race gravel geometry.

This is the answer that Evolve gave me when mentioning my concerns about the apparent limitation of certain 50c tires:

Thanks for your message.

Actual tire width may vary depending on the tire brand, model, tread design, rim internal width, tire pressure, and installation conditions. Therefore, 50c tires from some brands work fine on our frameset when fitted to the wheelset. You may refer to the feedback shared by our customer.

However, our recommended tire size is 35–45 mm. To avoid compatibility issues, we still suggest you use tires within this range.

Please feel free to contact us if you have any other questions.

Best regards

A 45mm Hutchinson Toureg Race does fit, I think 5mm at the tightest spot. This is on your 32i rim. This is a pretty big 45c tire,  So I'm confident any 45 will fit in the rear.

For 50's, I've seen a report that a Pathfinder 50 will fit, though they run narrow and short, 47mm or so.

The tires that don't fit on a 23.5 innuendo rim:

Schwalbe RXPro 50 (measures 49.8 at 20 psi, used tire), less than 3mm

Schwalbe RPro 50 (measures 49.6 40 psi, new), clearance right at 3mm

Hutchinson Toureg Race 50, 52.2, rubs on one side, less than 2mm other side. Note, Caracal Race is the same dimensions so I'm guessing same result.

Continental Dubnital 50, 49.6, new 40psi, less than 2.75 at the chainstays, this tire is pretty tall.

Looks like they are pretty honest about the 50c clearance but I'm not exactly sure if the Cima Gr is the right frame for me as it looks like my Crux that are rated at 47c had more clearance then this frame that states 50c...not reassuring but at least they are being honest about it when asked directly.