They are made in different factories, by different people, with different QC processes. Remember, too, that EN standard compliance is a baseline for legality in China, but you need ISO4210 or an extended version of that standard for compliance and liability reasons when selling outside of China. There are some Aliexpress brands that seem to share factories with clone makers, so there is some overlap there; but for the "higher end" brands you mentioned, their only likely commonality is that they are in China.
This is like asking what the difference is broadly between a burger at McDonald's and the bar down the street. Both are made close to you and they pass local health inspections (hopefully). That's about it.
The companies and engineering staff behind each of the frames are totally different as well. Their approach to development is also really different. This is a bit of hearsay, but its a good example: when LTK / Permeants wanted to clone the Giant TCR Advanced SL. They put that bike on a deflection rig and then designed from the ground up form and a layup that replicate the ride feel and quality of the Giant by cloning its deflection numbers, not its shape. We see similar indications of benchmarking and then ground-up design from Elilee and Seka as well.
As a theoretical exercise, it would be interesting to put an '80s vintage Vitus 979 (stiff enough for Sean Kelly to win many sprints, and a lot of NOS frames in circulation) in a deflection rig and duplicate its headtube and BB stiffness stats in carbon fiber just to see how light you could go, and then start extrapolating iterations at +50 gram material increments for stiffness and life cycles to destruction.