@spcycle follow yeti arc or dv6 frame but use 66.5 or 66 HA
2.5 tire , no one uses 2.8 tire these day.
. also holes for bike bags  for bikepacking

Yep. STA way too high. Do try to shorten it

Do tell when there is a size S. Not everyone can use 460 reach m size.

But I do understand, for L and M.

Pls make it a stiffer rear swing arm.

If not, @lightcarbon you will get issue like that problem of
FS 381 model.

Looking forward for a size s.

Kind of interested in this 909. How is it so far in the rear stiffness for those whom are riding this frame?

Wonder if the rear swing arm is laterally stiff if you grab the top side of the rear wheel and seatpost  with push and pull.?

Finally a full build pic. Nice build. Your dropper cable housing will rub down on your shock. What was your solution for housing knocking inside the frame and rear swing arm?

Any idea for an elegant rear mud guard? I have not figured one out.

Hopefully you guys have cycle the rear suspension  movement for any binding. The top link at the top tube  might need a 10*16*1 spacer bushing. Very well depend on the frame tolerance.


No pic from me as mine is generic black build. Pretty much the same looks just all black.

Thats true. I am kinda dissapointed in it. Atleast design a knock block guard of some sort. Didnt get to know about it untill i got to try my fork out.

Just fyi to anyone whom has this frame or still going ahead.
Mtbtools. Com has a custom spacer.

Minimum space needed is 6mm for a lyrik 42 offset.
6-10mm is fine.

Shock bsuhing spacer might have some free play which needed some 1mm shim.

 

Quote from: scourge on March 30, 2021, 05:50:06 PM
Well bbr ordered his from winnowsports, not Haideli, and It was an early prototype, so maybe the issue will not be on the Haideli frame. Even if it is, looks like a simple fix. I'm still in.

Hey @scourge. You made me come out to the open to correct you.  I bought this am831 frame from topfire. They replaced  my lower linkage. . Are you a shill? I  didnt say i got it from winnow or others. I've asked you where your from you didnt bother to reply me...

So guys... Becareful whom your placing your orders from and whom your following.

Just for the damm record. Like any other chinese frame, its the hardware thats kinda crap. Bearing and inserts.
But bearing can be replaced and inserts can be shimmed.

All these fs frames has some precision issues.

They are all vendors.not the real manufacturer. The 1st one whom got it last year as i recalled was topfire.

Perhaps someone can measure a pike with boost crown width.?

The frame is okay approx 2.3 kg with hardware.. I have not built it. 

I am using a lyrik 42 offset boost and the.both air & compression knob hits the  downtube.

As i said its a dissapointing  that it hits but it can be remedied but an pain in the ass.

Remedy with a 5mm 1.5 lower headset crown for fat bike.

Nice try.. Kinda Rude too. Scourge .. Wont be replying you again.

And Some other  aligment issues which i had to use 1 mm washer to fill the gaps.

Not sure if the engineers are amatuers/newbies...

Linkage machining which leads to bearing being pressed in either too deep or pressed too hard and this pits the bearing.

Is this trunnion mount?

Perhaps this frame can do 115 mm travel with 45 stroke

This frame from the looks can fit a piggy back shock.

I'd seriously let them iron out the quality issues.
Till now they have not sent my replacement link.

And i think those in the NA or europe will need to fork out more due to the trade war.

Looks rally good. What are the specs?

Reach, Sta, hta, cs shock lenght?

74 sta. 

Perhaps i was not consice enough but i dont think there is a need to point out the specifics.

If that lexon could be 76 sta perhaps it can be a contender.

Looking closer, 45x cs.

Quote from: scourge on December 09, 2020, 04:28:46 PM
Pretty sure the Lexon Spark is a VPP frame.

This a vpp kinematic. Pretty sure any "previous" chiner aint a vpp.