Quote from: Avalius on June 11, 2024, 04:42:48 AM
Yes, exactly this is the part
Did you use both parts? I can't fit the second/smaller ring in with the brake cables, etc. I am still using the original headset bearings.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Avalius on June 11, 2024, 04:42:48 AM
Yes, exactly this is the part
Quote from: Emraize on April 28, 2024, 01:17:42 PM
Somehow i'm still struggling with a bit of headset play:
- the expander sits tight and flush in the steerer tube during and after headset compression
Quote from: this is dog on March 25, 2024, 02:27:01 PM
I'm running 160mm rotors with SRAM Force, no adapters needed.
Quote from: this is dog on March 05, 2024, 01:25:15 PM
I was running a mullet setup initially, 10-50 SRAM Eagle GX AXS in the back + 42t SRAM Force AXS crankset. Changed it to SRAM Force XPLR AXS 10-44 + 44t SRAM Force AXS crankset.
Quote from: adroitrider on November 09, 2020, 09:57:17 PM
Are you happy with sizing down? How does your build ride? Did you end up changing the stem or headset spacers to increase reach/stack?
I sized up and have no complaints.
Quote from: Roby13 on November 06, 2020, 06:51:25 AM
I don't want to upset anybody here or deviate the threat so I'm going to try for the last time to explain my point.
Let's say I'm going to buy a new xc bike with modern geometry. In terms of HT angle, ST angle and wheelbase the closest a I could find are the BMC, Unno and Mondraker. On any of this brands I will take hands down the L size which is the one I have always ridden and I don't think any of you would advice me to by the XL. Well, if I take the L from Carbonda it would equal a XL from those brands.
Of course I can ride a XL just lowering the saddle on those and due to the long wheelbase it would be stable and planted on the downhills but it won't feel nimble or fast cornering or going up, which you really need on xc bike.
Quote from: BeTon on October 24, 2020, 12:53:49 PM
Thanks! I have been reading quite a lot on the offset, 51mm seems common on 120 forks that replace 100mm forks to decrease the trail a bit caused by the longer stroke and slacker head angle. However, to increase slow speed uphill maneuverability, progressive brands move the wheel towards the frame again by reducing the offset to 44. I think I'll look for a 44mm 120 fork.
Quote from: Jotegr on October 23, 2020, 06:23:15 PM
That Fox DPS is cheaper on e-bay than Fox Academy? No way!
Quote from: Zdrenka89 on September 08, 2020, 10:33:49 AM
Quote from: Colt__Seavers on September 04, 2020, 01:20:46 AM
Looks like a very light build. Wonder how much you did spend on components.
Why you did take size L? Your seatpost length looks enormous!
I took an L because my Torso is short compared to my legs AND my local woods are quite tight and twisty. I was a bit worried about the overall length of the XL. I like the low handlebar on my L so an XL would have needed negativ rise stem and flatbar to get the same position. Its all compromises!