Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Sdp74

Pages: [1] 2
1
29er / Re: LightCarbon 918?
« on: October 24, 2022, 10:15:03 AM »
Has anyone tried a 165x40 or 165x42.5 shock? does the frame support it?

2
29er / Re: LightCarbon 918?
« on: October 19, 2022, 06:44:21 AM »
Hello, how high do you take the saddle? I carry the saddle at 74cms high, and because of the geometry, I wanted to look at a  L size .

3
29er / Re: LightCarbon 918?
« on: October 10, 2022, 06:56:28 AM »
Hello, has anyone verified that it is compatible with a 165×40 shock absorber? and another question, have you tried putting the remote up, facing the frame?

4
29er / Clon epic evo
« on: October 08, 2022, 02:50:02 AM »
€ 849,56 | EVO EX-Cuadro de bicicleta de montaña XC, cuadro de bicicleta de carbono, suspensión completa 29, marco de refuerzo XC, marco de prueba para Cross Country
https://a.aliexpress.com/_EuOYilV

5
29er / Re: **Haideli Customer Appreciation FM-M009 Hardtail Frame GIVEAWAY!**
« on: August 22, 2022, 04:52:45 PM »
Enter

6
29er / Re: New Lexon spirit
« on: July 14, 2022, 02:14:36 PM »
I have tried to change the title, but it seems that it is only changed in my initial post.

7
29er / New Lexon spirit
« on: July 10, 2022, 01:47:38 PM »
let's chat friendly.
https://a.aliexpress.com/_vBm9LQ

8
29er / Re: Info and opinions on Miracle Cycling's FS822
« on: May 18, 2022, 11:04:41 AM »
geometry.

9
29er / Re: Info and opinions on Miracle Cycling's FS822
« on: May 18, 2022, 10:48:02 AM »
I believe that the geometry of the bike is a current geometry. I think that it is a bike with a lot of slooping and that the sizes are smaller than others. I don't see many differences with a spark , or with the new merida. A reach of 44.5 in size M is not a short reach. Many bikers who are between size M and L, who are looking for bikes with a very long reach, can choose the L. The bike with so much slooping, a slightly longer seat tube looks good. Does anyone know the price? delivery times? I have seen aliexpress price (1450 euros), but it seems to me that the price is not correct

10
29er / Re: Carbonda FM909
« on: February 24, 2022, 01:57:17 AM »
M

11
29er / Re: WCB-M-363 Workswell
« on: January 11, 2022, 05:15:52 AM »
I have contacted them. At the moment they dont know the price, they havent told me the weight and it will be available in July or August. It seems that they only have the design, they have not started to manufacture it.

12
29er / Re: Carbonda FM909
« on: December 12, 2021, 01:46:21 AM »
It seems that a 165x42'5 damper will do well. In this way you could have about 110mm of travel. I would like to confirm this point. Does anyone plan to put a 165x42'5 shock absorber?

13
29er / Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
« on: February 18, 2021, 07:44:56 AM »
Quote from: theirishrider on February 18, 2021, 05:31:35 AM
The 42.5mm shock works well, it seems to give more than 100mm but as far as I know we don't know exactly how much travel but probably 110-120mm. It feels natural with this stroke size so no worries there.
The bike is being raced a national level (https://www.facebook.com/patxiciafanpage)  and was even in the recent XCO world champs so it's clearly capable. I'm going to be riding it with 120mm in the National Points Series (hopefully) here in Ireland and I'm going to be keeping the 120mm Sid Select rather than 100mm due to the terrain here. I wouldn't worry about the head angle, people said the same every time it gets slacker - You don't go slower ;D Where are you racing and what's the terrain like?
Hello, I live in Mallorca (Spain) and I do all kinds of routes and terrain, of course I also endured descents. In my land there is a lot of Stone. The idea is to change bikes to get a better performance going down and not going up slower ... If the carbonda doesn't go down much faster than my current top fuel xc, I don't think I'm interested in changing bikes.

14
29er / Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
« on: February 18, 2021, 01:56:14 AM »
Quote from: Medico on February 16, 2021, 05:08:04 AM
I have a 42.5mm shock..rs deluxe and with 25% sag it uses 80-90% of its travel..first i did 30% sag which did use full travel, but not that often... Less tsag means less pedalstrikes (in flat terrain with a lot of turns).

Hope it helps
Thanks for answering, it helps me, but it raises more questions. In my case I have a trek top fuel xc with 100mm of travel. I have put a 120mm fork and as the frame supports it, I have also put a 165 * 45 shock absorber (it came from the factory with a 165 * 38 shock absorber). And although in theory it would have to have 120-120 travels, the truth is that the bike is not designed to take advantage of the entire shock absorber travel and I think it has been about 110mm of travel. My dilemma is that I don't know if when changing frames I will notice a lot of improvement going down. Keep in mind that the Trek suspension system is a "horst link" style and this system makes the suspension very independent from braking (which is not the case with the mono pivot system). On the other hand, I like the geometry of the carbonda, but I don't know if it will be too extreme for xc marathon (steering angle about 66º with 120mm fork). Going down I'm not good, but I'm not bad either. What is your opinion?

15
29er / Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
« on: February 16, 2021, 04:57:07 AM »
Hi guys, I wanted to know if the bike easily accepts the entire 165 * 42'5 shock travel. I ask this because there are bicycles that, although they accept 115mm of travel, it is very difficult to get them to give the full travel. I don't know if I explain myself well, since my native language is not English.

Pages: [1] 2