Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Takiyaki

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 28
1
Front clearance is the same. In my mind this bike is basically a giant TCR with 37mm of tire clearance.

I try really hard to avoid spamming the thread with how good this bike is, but in terms of weight and ride feel, I think it’s the rare sub $1K open mold frame as good thats as good as a branded frame. Unfortunately, it’s a bit like the TCR and Aethos: it looks dated from an aero perspective which is likely a reason this frame isnt more popular. There are also the seatpost binder and other issues documented.

I think it’s a bit telling that the Mondinice aero bike didnt seem to work out as well. Whatever they did developing this bike seemed to right thing vs. that one.

Without changing the profiles of the tubes too much in an effort to build on what they did right here, I would like to see a more hourglass + deeper HT resulting in a longer reach by 1-2cm and this thing could look the part of a Noah Fast 3.0 competitor—though it would still be lacking real aero credentials. That said, I would also love to see more BB drop, but that might be messing with the formula too much.
Truthfully, for the aero stuff Im debating 3D printing elements like the deeper headtube and rear wheel wraparound deal. I might extend the fork profile as well. If it bears any fruit in testing I will share the .STL files. Truthfully I don't know if it will make a big difference but it will be a fun project. This bike ticks all the other boxes for me. I don't mind the continued insight.

2
I can fit that size hex key between the frame and the tire, checked at both the seat and chainstays.
OK wow! Thanks for confirming

Edit- what's the clearance in front?

3
Sakizaki- when you mention the clearance in the OP, is that on either side or total?

4
My saddle height is 70cm, I have about a 31.5 inseam, is that close to you? Do you have issues with stand over height?
Not on my current bike, but I have a ~32 inseam and the 266 standover height in size L with 32-35c tires gets damn close. Will be really interesting getting on the bike on the trainer. I do know how to track stand so that might come back into play

5
Is your seat slammed all the way forward? you must have long arms haha, how much seat post is showing on yours?
It is pretty far forward but not all the way. I do have long arms. Saddle height was 70cm but I just raised it to about 72cm. I think if I can get my hand position a little higher and further forward. I just realized standover height might be an issue though.....

6
Can anyone comment on sizing?

I am 175cm and ride a 52cm Tarmac with a 120mm stem

Should I go for small or medium, looking for racy geo, but with the medium I could slam it, correct?

I had a LTK118 before and it was a great bike, trashed it for 30,000KM with no issues
Ha, I am your height and ordered a size L. I am currently riding a size 54 bike with a ~140mm stem and I want a less aggressive fit.

Whether or not you can slam it depends on your fit, stem angle etc. I am looking to slam mine with a 6 degree stem and riser drop bars.

7
Looking for something in the 380-400mm range for bars and maybe 100-110mm range for stem

Would absolutely love if the cabling just went under the stem rather than through it to enable me to play with different stem lengths/angles w/o taking the bars apart.

8
Road Bike Frames, Wheels & Components / Re: TFSA bikes anyone?
« on: September 03, 2026, 01:43:22 PM »
IIRC they dont sell to the US anymore. They had a cool one I wanted but it wasn't available to buy on Aliexpress

9
This is going to sell like hot cakes :o
Sander, is yours on the way yet ;D
Gotta admit to being tempted....

I went ahead and ordered the LTK-266-D-SL. Im riding a clone now (Cervelo R5) but the Tarmac SLx stuff is just a bridge too far for me. 266 ticks all the same boxes w/o the stigma.

10
Ugh. I dont want a Tarmac clone, but this ticks so many boxes. Thankful for the LTK-266-D-SL

11
Finally finished my LCR018 in black and silver tones.

Components:
•   Frame in size 54 raw carbon glossy finish with inframe storage
•   HBR17 handlebar (400 * 100 mm)
•   Serenade wheels, Model TAR50WS (25 mm inner 31 outer), 50 mm deep, SR278C Hubs
•   30 mm Michelin MICHELIN Pro 5 with TPU tubes
•   105 di2 groupset, 11-34 T 12 speed cassette, direct mount for rear derailleur
•   Basic Gineyea BB
•   Magene TEO with 170 mm carbon crank arm and Passquest 50-34 T
•   160 mm VXM rotor in front, 140 mm in the back
•   Cheap bottle holder (that I might change because it hinders the opening mechanism of the storage door), cheap bar tape and cheap rear lamp all from aliexpress
•   Ryet 3D saddle
•   Onirii carbon pedals

Build was quite straight forward nothing too complicated. I did use foam sleeve tubes for the brake hose.
8.5 kg as pictured (with pedals, wahoo and all my repair kit in the frame).

I did a small test ride. There is a small rattle sound but I feel it comes from the inner storage, I need to investigate. No seatpost or saddle slippage (I did put anti slip carbon grease though). My only complaints is the saddle bolts that are so difficult to tighten and the gap between the frame and the first spacer. That glossy finish is also quite fragile I already have some scratches due to chain drops or small shocks when building the bike. Finally I might redo the bleeding on my Shimano brakes because I feel the feeling can be improved.

I might change for a lighter cassette and also the saddle but other than that it is pretty much spot on.
This looks so good you have convinced me to get this for my next frame in chameleon purple/green

I am just a little bummed about the weight of these builds. I am hoping to stay under 7.5 kg with 2x, an electronic groupset and 32c tires. Will def have to be picky with stuff like bars, saddle, cranks/cassettes etc....


12
I still can't get over the massively long reach. Don't get me wrong, I don't mind reach, still young and flexy enough to be comfortable... But the reach is so similar through all sizes, the small sizes seem ridicilously long. Are you guys just taller to get the bigger sizes and have a relatively normal reach? The reach is turning me off this bike
It looks like the true STA makes the reach a good bit shorter

Anyone looking at this frame is gonna need to find some kind of geometry tool to account for it to dial in fit.

13
True, although steeper STA should be accompanied with substantial increase in reach across all sizes to prevent sitting to far over handlebarsand excessive load on arms. So far, progressive geometry is still (and probably will be) a very niche stuff.

Now I'm really confused. The forward offset BB basically acts like a huge seatpost setback, which runs counter to the progressive geometry ideal. I need to think about this. I might draw something up in fusion

14
First of all, lol @ this frame. Not because it's bad, but because it's just kind of funny at how unoriginal these companies are getting. At least they are copying stuff we want.

I do feel like these offset seatpost frames require a rethink on how geometry is calculated. Most frames have a vertical BB offset. I think it's time to start counting horizontal BB offset from the seat post axis and rethinking stuff like STA, TTL, maybe even reach to be honest. Because where this geometry chart says your saddle is going to be and where it's actually gonna be are super different. I would not be surprised if we were talking about saddles being like 30-50mm more forward than the charts would indicate which obviously impacts fit, handling etc. Biggie is shortened effective reach. Other stuff like hip angle will be impacted too. So you would have to do another level of geometric analysis to truly transfer your fit 1:1. And it's possible the geometry of these offset seatpost frames will require a total rethink of fit.

15
Damn thats wide! I will prob go w/32s then

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 28