Frame is here. Everything looking fine. Bottom bracket screwed in super smooth, seatpost and storage cover fit snug and tight, frame looks clean on the inside.
All parts included. Didn't weigh anything because is really don't care.
Without any stickers, its looks boing. So i made some graphics. Gonna call it WYDE.

The pathfinder tires measure 56,5-57mm and have huge clearance. Threw in the 61mm mtb wheels and they would probably fit as well.

If someone in Europe is interested in this frame, i'm willing to sell it. Immediate availability.
I just put in an order for another bike and probably won't build up the FM376 anymore.

Looks great, but I would need L. What other frame did you order ?

That would be a nice frame with 75mm BB drop and 74 STA. Stack is on Lower but this can be adjusted with spacers. But still 10-15mm more wouldn't hurt in larger sizes.

I would go with fm336. It's a gravel bike but the geo is great, even slightly more aggressive then new synapse

Cassette 11-46 and no cog 14 is such a stupid choice . You don't even get 1:1 with sufficient chainring, but you get big Jump from 15 to 13. This gruppset makes no Sense.

It looks that there is a new upgraded version of leoseek power meter

https://a.aliexpress.com/_EQFJSvo

Reach & stack on L is great. I'm 182 cm and would run 90 mm stem. My back angle is already in the more agresive <140°. Not sure why would i need a crazy long stem, I wouldn't even reach the bars.

Sounds like you're sitting waaaay to the back and/or have short hands

Just to add one more thing to the BB drop discussion. Few years ago I had specialized diverge E5 comp with 85mm bb drop. I used it as a gravel and road bike with 28c tires. I really loved how this bike was riding and I never had a problem with pedal strikes. That's why I think current era road bike should have 75/80mm bb drop and gravel bikes even more. It makes the ride so much more planted and confidence inspiring, really like I'd during high speed road descent on hairpins. Great for those those tight corners. It's also great in terms of aero because your whole body is lower, so the drag is lower.

I literally said "I get that you dont like the short reach, i would also want it a bit longer" so, we are on the same page there 😅

I do like steep seat tubes though. 74.5deg ideally for me. And yes, both reach and seat tube angle affects top tube horizontal length... But the reason to have steeper seat tube is rather to get correct placement over pedals then to make top tube shorter. In this case toptube should have been 10mm longer while keeping ST-angle 😊
I also think HT-angle and fork rake is better to change for reactiveness of the bike. As long as stem is not extremely long, its ok.
I would probably be fine with 80-90mm stem, on this frame.

I'm 187cm but would need to use size 56 due to stack. With such a short reach I would need to pair it with 120 stem