Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - hsaus

Pages: [1] 2 3 4
1
Component Deals & Selection / Re: Handlebar tape recomendation?
« on: November 19, 2024, 05:47:02 AM »
Another upvote for the Supacaz clones from me.

I hate removing bar tape that has adhesive backing, especially when they tear and leave behind sticky and crumbly residue. That's why I used to stick to PRO brand tapes with the tacky silicone backing. And they're excellent, but they don't exactly have the most interesting designs.

But I've found a way to use bar tape with adhesive backing without the downsides by combining two tricks:

  • Wrapping first with electrical tape inside-out (as documented in Park Tools videos and elsewhere), and
  • Removing the adhesive strip from the back of the bar tape. Not just the white protective strip, but the actual adhesive too. Typically it peels off easily once you get it started, but sometimes it tears part-way through and you have to get started again. The inside-out electrical tape provides enough adhesive strength to keep the tape in place, while still allowing for easy re-wraps and correction of mistakes (of which I make many).

2
Component Deals & Selection / Re: Magene P505 PES Base Spider Powermeter
« on: November 04, 2024, 06:42:26 AM »
Being able to use the P505 Base PM crankset is more about the shape of the BB area on the drive side.

https://chinertown.com/index.php/topic,4952.msg60729.html#msg60729

3
Component Deals & Selection / Re: Magene P505 PES Base Spider Powermeter
« on: November 03, 2024, 09:35:13 PM »
People happily using P505, could you please tell me, if it fits a 90.5 mm wide BB? And how much this powermeter returns back to bike's frame? I wonder if I could use P505 with my Spcycle G068 frame with t47 BB.

Where's the 90.5mm BB measurement from? The Spcycle G068 BB shell is 86.5mm wide.

I don't have specific experience with the Spcycle G068 frame, but I've successfully used my P505 Base PM crankset with both an Spcycle G056 frame and a VeloBuild VB-R-066 2023 Disc frame, without any spacers. Both frames used a T47 BB with internal bearings (86.5mm shell width). The clearance is slightly less on the G056 frame than it was on the VB frame.

4
Maintenance, Mechanics, & Tools / Re: Correct Nut for BB T47
« on: October 31, 2024, 03:32:07 PM »
I used this tool, worked ok, but requires a lot of care to torque up to prevent slipping: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005006581207359.html

I've seen this tool that may work better, but I've no experience with it: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005006215785806.html

5
I put these nylon bolts in the unused mount points of my frame. Lightweight, and won't rust. Size M5

https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005005853015671.html

6
I happen to actually like a bit of a thicker grease in pedals, because it is more water resistant and easier to clip in. I have some look carbon pedals and those spin like crazy and i hate it, although i got somewhat used to that, but i will replace the lubricant to something thicker in those soon.

I agree that pedals shouldn't spin too easily for ease for clipping in, and I did exactly what you plan to do with a set of Look Keo pedals I used previously. But these Onirii pedals were waaay too slow. Shimano and Exustar get this right in my experience.

7
An addition to the 'avoid' category: the Onirii PD-06 lightweight SPD-SL compatible pedals recently featured on Trace Velo.

The weight matched the description, and they looked ok on first inspection. However, as others have reported, the grease is thick and sticky, resulting in very slow rotation back to the resting position. So I figured I'd replace that grease with some lighter grease and see if that'd improve the situation.

However, the nut that threads into the pedal body is made of cream cheese, and it disintegrated as soon as I tried to unscrew it. I made triple sure that I was turning in the correct direction and that I used a wrench that fit tight.

Interestingly, in Trace Velo's video, he doesn't actually show the step where he loosens this nut - he unscrews it, but he says he had already loosened it off camera. How he did that is a mystery to me.

AliExpress return & refund request submitted and approved.

8
I recently installed this mount on one of my bikes that has a Kalloy Uno stem. The mount was recommended in another thread on this forum. Seems solid, no issues so far.

https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005003849019564.html

9
The tyres measured 29.5mm wide. Going with tyres that measure 32mm wide would leave about 4mm either side, both at the fork and the chainstays.

10
On the topic of G056 vs G068 geometry, here's a comparison of G056 size S vs G068 size XS:

https://bikeinsights.com/compare?geometries=632176549533910022b2d19e,666fda799d2f8b001bc280ae,

Because the G068 is so long, toe overlap would be even less of an issue compared to G056.

But 385mm reach and 551mm effective top tube of the G068 in size XS??? Shorter riders need not apply I suppose?

11
From the photos the top tube looks quite slack, so at 175cm tall standover isn't an issue? One thing I notice is the BB to fork distance is quite wide at 600mm, even the XS is at 587. I'm guessing toe overlap is less an issue with this frame geometry?

I'll admit I didn't give standover height much thought, but it hasn't been a problem. I'm sure I would've noticed if it was!

And definitely no toe overlap. Though I'm using 34mm slick tyres (measured width, haven't measured the height). Maybe 47c knobbly tyres could cause rub?

Though I'm thinking it might be time to retire this frame with something that has progressive gravel geometry.

I'm definitely no gravel bike geometry guru, but I think "progressive gravel geometry" essentially means "race-oriented gravel geometry"? The G056 is no slouch, but there are definitely racier gravel frames out there. Maybe the Spcycle G068 that has been mentioned in another thread, though I find that frame's geometry baffling.

12
I'm 175cm and chose size S as the touch points were supposed to be a close match to my VeloBuild 066 size S endurance frame, with identical stack: https://bikeinsights.com/compare?geometries=65d910dc257cb4001beb4fe2,632176549533910022b2d19e,

I run it with the headset cover (10mm high) and one 10mm spacer below the stem. The stem is a 110mm -7 degree Uno stem, and I have compact short reach handlebars.

Curiously, a quick measurement I took before travelling had the saddle to bar distance a bit longer than my VB066, which surprised me, as they are set up very similarly. I'll take some additional measurements when I return to see if I just made a mistake, or if the geometry chart is perhaps slightly off.

In any case, the setup so far works well for me as an "all-road" bike for rough paved roads, but it's by no means aggressive. I don't race, and the lowest stack bike I have is 545mm.

13
Hi. Anyone have som example of good 1x crank and chainring combo with p505?

P505 - multiple, depends on which variant you have (older SRAM 3-bolt, newer SRAM 8-bolt, Rotor.

P505 Base - none that I'm aware of

14
I'm 175cm and went with size S, as it enabled me to very closely match the touch points on my previous endurance bike. I run it with a 110mm stem and an offset seatpost.

15
We appear to have two separate threads for this frame. I'm also looking for a better headset compression ring, using the one supplied with the frame for now.

Linking my build report here for visibility and so we can better share what we find: https://chinertown.com/index.php/topic,3739.msg65794.html#msg65794

Pages: [1] 2 3 4