Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Noladutch

Pages: [1] 2
1
i like it but an al niner is a couple hundred more. it fits 50s has a round post. hard ot beat that niner value.

2
Any pictures of this built up as a bike?

I love the looks of non dropped stays, udh, and huge down tube but seeing it built with wheels would certainty help me make a decision considering how long it is.

3
I don't know were you are but niner aluminum gravel frames are dirt cheap and much higher quality. They are 600 bucks new and have mad tire room fits 50s and even has internal dynamo wiring in fork.

Nice for the money and certainly a well known brand. The only real problem is press fit but chopping a tube straight is way easy compared to carbon frames being off.

The other plus for you is more top tube slope so stand over not a real issue. Just look at them if I were in the aluminum market it is well worth the extra coin

5
Yep the ten tooth thing is super overblown. That cog is for down hill any watts given up are gravity assisted watts. If you are in that cog on flat ground buy bigger front rings.

Hell I run a e thirteen 9 46 on my gravel rig but that 9 tooth is for down hill only.

6
I agree on a need for 50mm tires.  This frame looks like it could be used for bikepacking/touring with the placement of all the threaded bosses.  I wonder if someone will make a gravel geometry hybrid frame that can fit boost/148 rear wheels, and 110 front hubs.   (I suppose the rear frame geometry is too short to accommodate a 148 wide rear triangle and either a 73 or 83mm wide bottom bracket.)

They do it is the focus atlas. Boost spacing normal crank spacing

The wider hubs make stronger rims is the only real reason for it. Most don't want the wide q factor of mtb crank standards on a drop bar bike.

7
Not AliX but didnt want to make a new thread, 650B carbon wheels 24.5mm internal for £198 GBP

EXTRA10 code

https://www.chainreactioncycles.com/p/prime-orra-650b-carbon-gravel-wheelset

Insanely good deal
I agree went to buy but price is only for UK. Us customers full retail.

8
Cyclocross Frames, Wheels & Components / Re: SLACK Gravel Frame
« on: October 28, 2023, 09:32:04 PM »
Does anyone know who the maker / original supplier of this fork is?  Variable rake and 700x54.  Must be one of the larger Chinese suppliers to the OEM market.

https://nordestcycles.com/producto/albarda-carbon-horquilla   -- this one.  I'm seeing quite a few brands using it now.

https://www.speedercycling.com/Carbon-Adventure-Bikepacking-Fork-SC-ADV09-_p375.html

They make a number of different forks. That on has flip chips mounts dynamo routing and clears 55s

9
Component Deals & Selection / Re: Six Spoke Wheels for 29 MTB XC build
« on: October 28, 2023, 03:04:49 PM »
No experience at all, just wanted to say you shouldn't try to appeal to people with the taste of 12-year-olds, probably (no reason). And then I wanted to start a rant about how monocoque wheels are inferior to modern spoke wheels in almost every regard, starting with weight ... and then I saw the listed weights. Fuck, they're scary light!

I'm sorry. Didn't mean to interrupt. Pls do go on.

Nope man that is per wheel weights. You can get run of the mill xc carbon wheelsets a couple hundred more grams than the back alone.

I do like them if they truly are bomb proof. If they have a good price on the 11 11 sale that would be great.

With the cost of those I would be much more tempted to try berd spoked wheels if you are friends with a builder.

Now if I am looking for mtb bling I am going to industry nine and get some real flash. That is what the 12 year old me would buy all kinds of anodized goodness.

10
Cyclocross Frames, Wheels & Components / Re: SLACK Gravel Frame
« on: October 27, 2023, 08:20:46 PM »
Great thought, I was actually considering that the other day. All those 69 degree hardtails may be a good candidate, I was just worried a bit about what type of rigid fork i would need to run. The axle to crown length on some of those may be longer that a standard gravel fork. Oh and has flip chips


Here is another option. Been on the fence what my next build would be.

Been thinking the same thing but with this fork it is longer 120 suspension corrected and had dynamo wiring also. So that is what I have been thinking with an h bar set up. Yeah and I want clean dynamo lighting on the next bike.

https://www.speedercycling.com/29er-Carbon-Mountain-Adventure-Bikepacking-Fork-SC-MTN13-_p383.html

11
Yeah they have a few things at great prices like ragley frames at 50% off.

Just noticed a bit late my size sold out quickly in the trig. Great price for what it is.

So if you are small or tall they have good deals

12
If anyone is looking for an alternative groupset for gravel, Microshift Sword is available on AliEx:

https://www.aliexpress.us/item/3256805871184107.html



That is crazy expensive really.

You can get the grx 2x 10 complete group with cranks bb brakes chain cassette the whole thing for not much more.

Last time I looked it was around 350 plus shipping.


13
Well race is  up to you and set up.

The worlds were won yesterday on a un released Merida that looks shockingly like a jena or a gr047 from tantan. Dont know the geometry of it but it was size or two too small with a huge stem and an extremely long seat post. Certainly looks like a bike packing frame to me.

It has more to do with set up and the engine pushing the pedals.

Weight and aero are not real deal breakers because strength is more important and how fast are you really going?

Google mohoric's bike That won the rainbow jersey the other day. He ran a road group. 2x dura ace

Now I love that dropper post mad man mohoric.

14
Cyclocross Frames, Wheels & Components / Re: Lightcarbon LCG071-D Build
« on: October 01, 2023, 08:42:29 PM »
Regarding the press-fit BB: Park Tool makes a really expensive and hard-to-get reaming tool for BB86. It's one of the few tools I can't justify buying myself, but if I ever buy a frame with BB86 (which unfortunately is most Light Bicycle and Yishun frames), I'd definitely take it to a bike shop that has that tool. Same goes for facing the disc brake mounts.

I hear you on owning real shop tools. Too expensive for one use.

The amazing thing is way back in the day when I worked at a shop every build got faced and chased and I don't understand when that went away. Every seat tube got reamed along with headset before cups got pressed in. I don't understand why it is expected really it is part of build prep.

Even stupid expensive frames needed it and  aluminum alway needed it to just get round again. Then again this was threaded days before the stupid bb explosion.

Yeah if I was worried about the bb I would certainly be bringing it to a shop.

On the plus side looks like t47 is gonna take over hopefully

15
Cyclocross Frames, Wheels & Components / Re: Lightcarbon LCG071-D Build
« on: September 28, 2023, 09:36:04 AM »
Alright so I'm going to update everyone on my build so far:

As I noted in my last comment, shipping was not quick. Initially I had been quoted 15 days to shipping. The next 2 times I had asked for updates, Wendy said the frame would ship "by the end of next week", which was a lie on both occasions. Lesson learned, if you care about the lead time, ask for a quoted lead time BEFORE you pay. I had also ordered the frame with no rivets, but was told I would have to wait ANOTHER week for that one, but I could choose to take the riveted frame immediately, so I went for that. Not ideal but I'll live

Options chosen: 55cm frame, 100mm integrated stem, SP03 seatpost, black paint/no custom paint

Weights:
- frame: 1063g
- fork: 499g
- seatpost: 192g
- stem: 153g

Notes:

Frame: tubes look nice, feels very light, but the quality of the bottom bracket is dogshit. I don't know how this frame passed Hambini's BB-weenie test, because my frame's BB is terrible. HUGE deposit of resin on one of the cups that I had to file down. There's a big gouge/void in the other cup. Internal diameter was something like 40.3-40.8mm in diameter, when it should be a bit closer to 41. I've had to file down the void, and hit the cups with some sandpaper to clean up the surface. I'm using a token ninja thread-together BB, evidently the cups are not aligned because the crank has been binding like crazy to install, and does not spin freely. I'm hoping that most of it is just binding between the bottom bracket bearings and the crank spindle, but I might have to resort to a BBinfinite if the situation does not improve with some use. 

Fork: Chunky and solid. I mean, it weighs half as much as the frame. Thru-axle threads were crusty and bind-ey. As on many budget forks, inside of the steerer is fiberglass.

Seatpost: The tube is very thick and chunky. Easily could be 50g lighter. Painted with opaque gloss black paint. Internal profile is slightly oval. I like the seat binding clamps. This post definitely won't fail on you! Definitely a part I look to upgrade soon.

Stem: Awful awful awful. Stem face bolts and threads are not aligned well so it binds when screwing. Internal diameter of handlebar clamp is slightly smaller than spec so it slightly crushes the handlebar (I may have damaged my handlebar, oh well). Heavy. Why did this need to be carbon?

Hardware & assembly: Stem spacers are split, good. Seatpost clamp face is machined to literally appear like a device for filing/grinding things. Pretty okay for post-security, but this will LITERALLY shred the paint/material off of your seatpost where/near you clamp it. Headset bearings are okay, fitment is spot-on, no notes there, good-job lightcarbon. Everything else is bog-standard solid & cheap parts. Steerer tube compression bung and topcap compressor are heavy steel parts. For assembly, I built up with SRAM Force AXS etap, so very easy to just route the brake hoses, especially since I didn't have an integrated bar. No surprises there, I used a magnetic routing toolkit to help me out.

So, overall verdict? I guess for $660, it's fine. I kind of have regrets about getting this bike instead of a used bike, but that's on me. I've spent so much on this bike it's not really competitive with used bike prices anymore, which is really what motivated my road bike build in the first place. As for the quality--I have questions. This frame has ended up in the workshops of several youtubers lately, who have sung its praises--and my experience definitely does not line up. Is this "Wendy's revenge" for me insistently bugging them about getting my frame shipped? Or is some funny business afoot--did lightcarbon decide to let QC slip with the new popularity of this frame? Who knows.

Anways, wish me luck as I finish this build out and attempt a season of cyclocross on it.

Wow. I would just take a deep breath and relax I bit.

Lets put your frame into what you can truly buy for that 660 bucks. In my world you just bought a surly with a free headset stem and seatpost. Now look at your purchase. Would you rather a surly? Not me.

Lets go higher end well than a thousand bucks cheaper that a steel Rodeo Labs or Fairlight still with the free stuff.

The other thing when you had the stuff out crapping on the holes not being perfect did you take the time to measure the BB? Do you have a problem? And with what exactly? With a 40.8 you do realize that is less than two human hairs from 41. A human hair is .17

Everyone likes to crap on the frame without measuring the bb. The other thing press fit works when ALL things measure right not just the frame. Some brands of bb have the same problems making circles. The thread together or all the others are designed to fix problems. You only need them when you do have a problem.

I personally would just install a bb that measures what it should and ride it. You should order from a brand that offers t47 next time odds are that is what everyone is going to.

Nice bike certainly nicer than my old surly trucker.

Pages: [1] 2