Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Asco

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 7
1
Metal Frames / Re: Custom Ti All-Road: Geometry & 1x Clearance Log
« on: July 22, 2026, 05:57:18 PM »

Questions for the Chinertown Custom Ti Veterans:
The 48T Chainring vs. 40mm Tire Dilemma: A 48T ring is massive for a gravel frame. On 24mm internal rims, 40mm tires are going to stretch out closer to 41-42mm. For those who have done custom Ti builds with Chinese factories, what specific chainstay yoke design or dimpling instructions should I write into the order notes to ensure the chainring doesn't chew into the titanium stay while maintaining tire clearance?


You shouldn't need to do anything other than tell them the specs you want. They will tell you if it's possible or not, but I really doubt that combination will be an issue.

My suggestion is to get the process started, the back and forth can take a long time.

2
Component Deals & Selection / Re: stem mount Aerobar (balugoe)
« on: June 24, 2026, 02:59:24 PM »
Thank you.
Thats exactly my thought, the spcycle one looks decent but is more suited for a gravelbike. I dont want to go 43 on the drops when my aerobike has 36, i would feel like a parachute.

My main thought is adjustability and i am lurking around all the stuff i can probably make work, but this seems the most versatile.

Maybe i try this set and report back here.

Did you get around to trying these?

3
For most cranksets, the specified chainline is in between the rings in a 2x setup. That means if you mount a 1x chainring in the big ring position, it needs to be offset 3mm to get intended chainline.

Whether that chainline is what you need is a different question. It's possible that you need a 0 offset for the chainring to clear the chainstays, but not necessarily.

4
The, probably, most used cassette will be the 13 speed 10-46. For my gravel races, I don't need anything easier than 1:1, so I run a 46t front. And I'm not actually fit. Give me one more year of training, and I can probably get away with a 50t front ring for 1.09 gearing. It would still be a way easier gearing than the commonly used road 54/40 + 11-34, where the easiest gear available is 1.18.

Tucked in the pack on a false flat downhill or with a serious tailwind, saving watts by not being maximum cross-chained into the 10 tooth chain torturer seems important.

When comparing to road, it does start to matter to take wheel size into account. That 50T ring with a 50mm tire is roughly equivalent to a 53T chainring with a 30mm tire. The 50/46 is still a slightly easier gear than the 40/34, but just barely.

I still agree with what's been said about chainring clearance though.

5
Does anyone know why the 32"er is ~€200 extra over the 29" offerings?

Main difference I see is the in-frame storage, but it's also well heavier, much more than the wheel size would account for.

Did anyone recently order the frame and receive one? This pre-order process started a while ago, was anyone supplied already?
Curious what a realistic delivery time might be.

Because there is way less competition in the 32'er space? They can't charge 200€ extra on 29'ers because there's a million identical frames people can buy instead.

6
29+ & 27+ / Re: 32” MTB frames or wheelsets yet?
« on: April 30, 2026, 05:12:47 PM »
Here is a relatively cheap set of wheels. That's the first I've seen of a full build instead of just rims on Ali.

7
Anyway, the chances this frame can clear any reasonable amount of mud or debris with a 55mm tire at the rear is nil, with that RC.  It'll be bad with a 50mm.

A Lauf Seigla has 425mm chainstays. As does an Ari Shafer in the smallest size. I guess you can argue those bikes can't clear a 55 with sufficient mud, but then you're working with a different definition of tire clearance than everyone else.

8
Looks great. I asked a while back about chainring clearance, do you have the info?

9
Component Deals & Selection / Re: XCADEY VENTUS Carbon Cranks + PM
« on: April 01, 2026, 11:51:16 AM »
I'll re-test at some point.

iirc someone said they removed the real time offset reporting in their app? If they have, that's a step backwards. Also raises questions as to why they'd do that as it was extremely useful in debugging issues.

Yep, it no longer shows the offset. Very annoying.

10
Component Deals & Selection / Re: stem mount Aerobar (balugoe)
« on: March 25, 2026, 09:10:50 AM »
I have the aero handlebar-compatible clip on aerobars from Kocevlo https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005007431572824.html?spm=a2g0o.order_list.order_list_main.11.47461802ScBcia
They are a pain to install and make sure everything is lined up as it needs to be.

This stem-mounted system seems way better. You can adjust stack as well as bar angle, and the bars are guaranteed to be parallel. None of the aerobar compatible handlebar options (like the SPcycle one) come in a narrow enough size for me.

11
Component Deals & Selection / Re: Aero bottles & cages?
« on: March 18, 2026, 05:36:24 PM »
Can also vouch for the Ahyka bottles, they are easy to get in and out and the cages hold the bottles really well. I've run them in fast gravel races without issues.

Note also that bottles+cages are usually twice the price of the bottles alone - buying extra bottles is relatively cheap.

12
Cyclocross Frames, Wheels & Components / Re: XMCS: 2026 Aero Gravel bike
« on: February 15, 2026, 09:59:36 AM »
Looks good. From the drawing, I'm getting 74 STA, 71 HTA and 1.42 stack to reach ratio. Looking forward to seeing the geo, and hoping it is sufficiently aggressive.

Also curious about chainring clearance if you're willing to reveal that @Requiem84.

13
Cyclocross Frames, Wheels & Components / Re: XMCS: 2026 Aero Gravel bike
« on: February 12, 2026, 03:37:53 AM »
You are wrong ;-).

We just thought it would be nice to build up some excitement. So we’ll try to release new information every week.

That's great to hear! Looking forward to it.

14
Cyclocross Frames, Wheels & Components / Re: XMCS: 2026 Aero Gravel bike
« on: February 12, 2026, 03:01:50 AM »
My first thought is that advertising the clearance in the front means the rear clearance probably is the same 50mm as all the other current frames. Hope I'm wrong though!

15
Cyclocross Frames, Wheels & Components / Re: New Gravel Frame Ican Graro
« on: February 11, 2026, 03:28:09 AM »
I read further up that there have been some issues with this, so I wanted to ask: are there any experiences so far with the Magene PES power meter and chainrings larger than 40T? I’d like to run a 46T, but at least 44T.

1) No issues with the PES power meter, other than the fact that it is a road crankset so you have to space your crank or chainring further out in order for it to fit.
2) For chainring clearance, the chainstay design means that you have to space the chainring out quite far to clear a bigger ring. I have a 50T at somewhere around 50.5mm chainline, but it looks like going for a smaller ring wouldn't really allow me to reduce the chainline at all, until we get down to maybe a 44T.

Also, does the frame work well with a mechanical drivetrain? I’d like to keep using my GRX 1x12.

Especially for 1x, no issues at all.

And is there anything else to watch out for when ordering — any headset, spacers or other parts you need to mention, di2 holder? Or is it better not to order from there at all and go somewhere else(for example headset)?
DI2 holder yes, mine came with headset parts but not a full headset - note that they now also write on the site "Package included: Frame+fork+seatpost+bearings+thru axles+hanger".
I believe this used to say "headset" instead of bearings.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 7