FSA no69 headset system.

Allows you to run the cables through the plastic headset cover, through the bearings, and into the headtube. Intended to be ran with a separate handlebar and stem combo. For mechanical shifting groupsets I would not use any other system.

Ran this setup on my Velobuild 177 last year

Okay okay... A little spoiler.

But more really only after assembly.
Bottom bracket and wheels are still on the way 

105 mechanical (hydraulic)
Full internal cable routing
Full build was a breeze (well keep in mind 4 cables in the hb has their challenges, but by far the it was the easiest hb to work with for that.

I think the only real problem this frame has is that rear thruaxle which is annoying to fix whenever u need to remove the rear wheel.

https://www.ltbikes.com/index/products/view/id/21.html

That's my bike, 11,000km and counting. I love it. It's fast, comfortable (32C at the back and a lot of seat post exposed, your mileage may vary, idk). Alisa is easy to deal with by email. in 58, stack 596, reach 401, head tube 180. Mine is M.
Clears 32C easily, my rear tyre measures over 34mm, and there's plenty of space.
I dont directly recommend it anymore, because there are newer frames out there, but then again, i havent seen anything that would make me want to upgrade.

Never heard of Rinasclta, agree the logo is atrocious, and airwolf is on my black list of frame sellers. Interesting frame though, wasn't aware of it.
Hadnt seen the Carbonda 1136 either. I just looked at https://chinertown.com/index.php/topic,4178.0.html. It looks aero like a tank and the frame looks like a gravel bike, yet it only clears 32C? Very weird.

The VB177 is about the same age, if not older than my frame, and whether you really clear 32C has been debated on the thread a lot.

A few months ago, i thought the speeder 55 was very interesting, but didn't check if the geometry matches exactly. Also, it costs more. But i think it looks nice, and presumably, it's made with fancier carbon, in a fancier way. Does it matter? Realistically, probably not. What i can say is i built 2 LTK268, both were flawless, especially when it comes to installing the BB. Can't say the same of Winow, for eg, (now also on my black list) and generally, even though i hate aligning disc brakes, working on these 2 268 always went smooth, for which i'm very grateful.

Most of my riding is on the flat, and the bike is very happy at 37-42kmh, more with a tail wind. Like it's nice, you feel your friends on slower rigs starting to struggle, while mine just slips through the air. It's not just the frame, it's the package, but i guess my point is
1. i dont ride on the flat at 25kmh, bike reviewers often say that aero bikes aren't meant to go slow, they feel nice when they go fast. I'm not a bike reviewer, idk,
2. it will not slow you down if you have the legs to ride at 40kmh
3. matt damon.
It's also very capable in the mountains, much nicer to ride than my supersix himod rim that weighs 6kg, i must sell that bike.

I really like that bike And it's cheap!

Velobuild 177 is a good option