Author Topic: Understanding rear shock #s  (Read 1771 times)

brmeyer135

Understanding rear shock #s
« on: January 30, 2015, 12:40:46 PM »
Question about rear shocks.
To start, the following link is good overall in understanding:  http://www.pinkbike.com/forum/listcomments/?threadid=136066
My question was the same as the last person on that page:
The eye to eye is proportional to the stroke...but, say a bike needs a 200 x 50
Does a 200 x 51 or 200 x 57 work for that bike?
Initially, I would think that any 200 would work and as long as you are longer than the recommended you should be OK.



Carbon_Dude

Re: Understanding rear shock #s
« Reply #1 on: January 30, 2015, 10:49:25 PM »
I would expect that if the shock travel were a bit longer then the initial compression, sag, would just be a few more millimeters and possibly one would need a little less air pressure.
2019 Stumpjumper Expert 29/27.5+
2017 Santa Cruz Stigmata
2017 Trek Stache 9.8 (29+)
2016 Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Carbon Comp 6Fattie (27.5+) (Sold)
2016 Trek Stache 9 (29+) w/upgrades (Sold)
2014 -036 Full Suspension Chiner (Sold)
2013 -057 Hardtail Carbon Chiner (Sold)
Atlanta, GA