That 830 looks interesting too.
It does, on paper, but as some of the folks affected by the 831 situation have pointed out, there’s an extra risk in trusting a company that would bring such a flawed product to market without adequate field testing, and then charge $200+shipping for a “fix” that itself still appears to be fatally flawed.
The 830 *looks* like it wouldn’t suffer from the same problems, but with no field testing, we can’t be sure…and a dual-link swingarm bike puts lots of strain on the links’ bearings so it wouldn’t take much of a design flaw to cause issues with flex, bearing damage etc.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m extremely tempted by the 830 myself and would rather have one than a relatively generic 4-bar with an upside down shock. But I’m doing an unbranded frame build because I’m on a tight budget — not because I have the leeway to try all over again with a second frame because the first was a lemon.