Author Topic: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)  (Read 18089 times)

Nkearb

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #105 on: February 26, 2025, 03:19:45 PM »
I think the only issue with recent aero frames is the stack is too low. 32c Tire clearance frames can typically fit 35c


If we just had a specific bar&stem that added a good amount of stack without looking stupid or require 100 spacers that would solve basically all issues

Daviddavieboy

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #106 on: February 27, 2025, 09:05:21 AM »
I think the only issue with recent aero frames is the stack is too low. 32c Tire clearance frames can typically fit 35c

 Exactly why something like a pinarello x is perfect for an all round bike IMO. For what XM has for frames the CS-GR01 (gravel frame) has excellent geometry but way to wide tire clearance for my taste in a road bike. I am so have a CS-R01 and with 5 cm of spacers it’s not bad but slammed it feels like my SuperSix. It will fit a tire that measures 35 ish though.

janp

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #107 on: March 02, 2025, 11:34:27 AM »
I agree that $1,350 (excluding shipping but including the handlebar) is somewhat ambiguous. However, instead of just discussing the price, I’d like to contribute some constructive ideas on what features could justify a higher cost.

Here are a few things I’d love to see:

1) Seamless integration of a speed/cadence sensor – Similar to the Trek Madone, where the sensor mounts cleanly to the NDS chainstay without the hassle of rubber bands. This makes setup and maintenance much easier.

2) High-quality thru-axle with an integrated removal tool – A design where the covers sit flush with the frame and fork, adding both functionality and aesthetics. (https://de.aliexpress.com/item/1005008359478298.html?spm=a2g0o.productlist.main.13.4f6ehC5lhC5lPJ&algo_pvid=016a5eac-a290-408a-8815-4d7dcff462f7&algo_exp_id=016a5eac-a290-408a-8815-4d7dcff462f7-6&pdp_ext_f=%7B%22order%22%3A%228%22%2C%22eval%22%3A%221%22%7D&pdp_npi=4%40dis%21EUR%21194.78%2197.39%21%21%211440.68%21720.34%21%40%2112000044713324168%21sea%21DE%216019405720%21X&curPageLogUid=XH8cDlNu4Dxo&utparam-url=scene%3Asearch%7Cquery_from%3A)

3) Rubber plates at the fork ends – This would allow the fork to rest on the ground when the front wheel is removed, preventing damage.

I’m sure the community here has plenty of additional ideas—features that wouldn’t significantly increase production costs but would add real value to the frame.

Lastly, regarding pricing: As a European customer, I find it frustrating to pay an extra ~10% due to transaction fees (5% for PayPal plus unfavorable exchange rates). Offering direct bank transfers as a payment option would save me money—money I’d happily reinvest into a higher-end frame.

At the end of the day, total cost of ownership is what really matters to me.

Looking forward to hearing everyone’s thoughts!

jeffrey

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #108 on: March 04, 2025, 04:34:37 PM »
I'm continuing my search but still no results outside of the big brands.
I really can't understand why chinese manufacturers put out so many race frames that are all the same thing, and no one offers something with geometry similar to the Trek Domane

neobiker

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #109 on: March 05, 2025, 02:43:17 AM »
Lightcarbon had a model [LCG072-D], but it was purchased for an exclusive licensing. I reckon it is a matter of time before they announce a new model which should cover your need.

Blueberry

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #110 on: March 05, 2025, 03:10:01 PM »
How do people feel about the new Winspace C5 Aero? It looks vaguely interesting but I'm suspicious it might be more of that faux aero thing several brands are doing now.

Nkearb

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #111 on: March 05, 2025, 04:58:34 PM »
How do people feel about the new Winspace C5 Aero? It looks vaguely interesting but I'm suspicious it might be more of that faux aero thing several brands are doing now.

C5 aero looks good if you want an endurance aero frame, except without the endurance geo and with no money spent on r&d or testing for aero

hugovl

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #112 on: March 19, 2025, 04:42:59 AM »
Geometry attached. Size 56cm would be the first mold available in April. Since we make this frameset with high standard as couple of big brands, you could tell the details when it is available, one piece mold, mixed of T1100, 40T, 30T Toray carbon fiber. latex molding etc. The price on this frameset with handlebar won't be that cheap as our previous frameset.  But would be cheaper than some other Chinese brands.

Everything still in the works, with this mould/frame Peter? Any updates maybe?

PeterXu

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #113 on: March 19, 2025, 05:28:23 AM »
Everything still in the works, with this mould/frame Peter? Any updates maybe?
Doing the in-factory testing now, one piece molded raw finish frameset
Carbon rims, wheels, frames and components manufacturer
peter@xmcarbonspeed.com  petercycles@foxmail.com
WhatsApp: +86 18250808148
www.xmcarbonspeed.cc

bmrk

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #114 on: March 20, 2025, 09:20:22 AM »
Doing the in-factory testing now, one piece molded raw finish frameset

Raw finish looks good Peter. What kind of ride quality the frame will offer in terms of stiffness for both front and backend?

Which is the expected weight? Is the FD mount removable? Frameset will be sold with handlebar too? Can you share more pictures?

PeterXu

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #115 on: March 20, 2025, 10:35:15 AM »
Raw finish looks good Peter. What kind of ride quality the frame will offer in terms of stiffness for both front and backend?

Which is the expected weight? Is the FD mount removable? Frameset will be sold with handlebar too? Can you share more pictures?
I can't tell much on this new frameset at present, size 54cm would weigh around 895+/-30g (painted with the hangers and bolts mounted), yes the FD mount is removable. Frameset would be sold with our new handlebar.
Carbon rims, wheels, frames and components manufacturer
peter@xmcarbonspeed.com  petercycles@foxmail.com
WhatsApp: +86 18250808148
www.xmcarbonspeed.cc

bmrk

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #116 on: March 21, 2025, 04:16:09 AM »
I can't tell much on this new frameset at present, size 54cm would weigh around 895+/-30g (painted with the hangers and bolts mounted), yes the FD mount is removable. Frameset would be sold with our new handlebar.

Is it possible to share specs/pictures of the handlebar? Thanks!

PeterXu

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #117 on: March 22, 2025, 08:49:48 AM »
Is it possible to share specs/pictures of the handlebar? Thanks!
Here it is. The handlebar will be released end of April, size 380x90 weighs around 320g including mounting bolts
« Last Edit: March 22, 2025, 08:54:51 AM by PeterXu »
Carbon rims, wheels, frames and components manufacturer
peter@xmcarbonspeed.com  petercycles@foxmail.com
WhatsApp: +86 18250808148
www.xmcarbonspeed.cc

bmrk

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #118 on: March 22, 2025, 02:11:53 PM »
Here it is. The handlebar will be released end of April, size 380x90 weighs around 320g including mounting bolts

The 360mm-385mm, 120mm seems really interesting. Post pictures when available.
Thanks!

rsw42

Re: Frame req? (Aero, dropped SS, high stack, short reach)
« Reply #119 on: March 27, 2025, 03:23:48 AM »
I can't tell much on this new frameset at present, size 54cm would weigh around 895+/-30g (painted with the hangers and bolts mounted), yes the FD mount is removable. Frameset would be sold with our new handlebar.

Do you already know what's the rider weight limit going to be?

I'd be happy to take a heavier frame for more durability, since I'm way to heavy...