Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Eneen

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
16
Assembling Carbonda 909 with headset routing and it works far better then classic internal or even external due to less force required to turn and no more cables banging around near handlebar. It requires only bit more work due to tighter cable length tolerance. I should have tried to order frame without headtube holes.

17
29er / Re: Wanted - hardtail downcountry frame
« on: April 05, 2023, 04:29:17 AM »
1306 has 52mm upper bearing, so I guess SlackR would be only possible with some kind of spacer...

18
29er / Re: Carbonda FM909
« on: April 05, 2023, 04:04:29 AM »
@Arno Krell, could you post link to titanium suspension bolts? Are they from aliexpress?

19
29er / Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
« on: March 22, 2023, 05:04:35 PM »
AFAIK 909 is UDH already...

20
29er / Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
« on: March 13, 2023, 03:38:48 AM »
Scott has 3pos, but in the middle pos they both adjust compression and limit travel by about 30% by adjusting positive chamber volume via valve. I think it's possible to install nude shock in both 936 and 909.

21
29er / Re: Max tire width FM936 & FM909
« on: March 11, 2023, 02:18:39 PM »
From drawings 909 has bit more clearance than 936. When I get my 909s I can check it thoroughly.

22
29er / Re: Carbonda FM909
« on: March 10, 2023, 09:20:51 AM »
285mm insertion for L from top of ST so just subtract...

23
29er / Re: Carbonda FM909
« on: March 10, 2023, 05:04:03 AM »
It will be new "rocker", so I guess same thing as with 936, quite high BB.

24
29er / Re: Carbonda FM909
« on: March 07, 2023, 10:41:14 AM »
Two months ago he told me, that they won't do 120mm for 909, oh well...

25
29er / Re: Carbonda FM909
« on: March 06, 2023, 05:45:14 AM »
Does 909 come with seatpost clamp?
If not, could someone recommend one from ali?

26
29er / Re: Carbonda FM909
« on: February 28, 2023, 11:32:06 AM »
This is how transparent glossy over UD looks like (imgur video link):
https://i.imgur.com/iKXkvSA.mp4

27
29er / Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
« on: February 24, 2023, 10:10:52 AM »
What's Skype contact to Adam? Haven't heard from him since February, 6th, despite kind reminders...

28
29er / Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
« on: February 08, 2023, 01:25:54 AM »
This is clear glossy/matte over raw carbon. That's what I've ordered for my 909 (glossy), but I don't have photos yet. However, before I ordered, Adam sent me video of what it looks like: it's something like Orbea raw carbon with visible UD structure. IMO it looks better than standard matte black primer finish, as I can use glossy transparent stickers over it. I'm not sure if they remove black primer or get "bare" frames from factory.
For $35 extra you can order glossy/matte gradient.

29
29er / Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
« on: February 01, 2023, 06:16:46 AM »
76-65.8=10.2
77-67=10
0.2deg difference, I guess close to measuring tolerance.
Rising front by 20mm rotates frame by about 1 deg. Arno has 531mm fork, so front went up about 25mm from default Carbonda spec (506mm). Carbonda replaced only rocker, so maybe rear end wasn't actually risen by 10mm, but only 3-5mm?

30
29er / Re: Carbonda fm936 Thoughts
« on: February 01, 2023, 06:05:25 AM »
SA/HA relation is almost same as with drawings: 76/65.8 vs 77/67, 0.2deg difference. So where's en error?
120mm forks clearly have about 530mm, Carbonda spec is for 110 or something like this.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5