But the upper bearing of 909 is IS52, isn't it?

I'm thinking about using 120mm fork with this frame to build all-round bike or buying FM1002, not sure yet. I'm coming from 63 HTA hardtail (65 HTA sagged) so it's extremely nice to shred down but harder to turn. 909 will have 66 HTA so it's on the steep side. Do you have such setup (909 on 120mm fork) and slacker enduro frame? Does 1 deg steeper HTA make such difference? I've seen that current trail bikes are going rather into 65 territory then staying on 66.

The X2 doesn't fit. the problem is not the Air can, the problem is the reservoir...

But X does fit, doesn't it?

The blue line is the overall force needed to go from 0 to full travel.
The red line is the force needed to get the next 1mm of travel at any given point.

Both shocks are the same except for a slightly bigger volume spacer in the FM936 to match the overall bottom out resistances.

@Julian, thank you for your work! Could you do same sim but add more volume spacers to 909? I know it will shorten effective travel a bit, but maybe it will also rise midstroke. How much do you think bendy seatstays could affect this curve?
Maybe also bending point should be closer to seatstays bridge?

What headset type does this frame use? If it's ZS it could take -2 deg angleset right?

Here are dimensions for 901 frame. It seems wheel base and BB-to-front don't match: either WB is too long (should be about 1092) or BB-to-front to short (should be about 676mm). Hope second one. I'll let you know when I get answer from Bert.

Flyxii FR-202/FR-200:
https://www.aliexpress.com/item/2015-FR-202-Full-carbon-UD-Glossy-29ER-Mountain-Bicycle-Bike-MTB-Frame-BSA/32299199635.html
and Iplay IP-FMT02:
https://www.aliexpress.com/store/product/chinese-carbon-frame-Cheap-MTB-carbon-frame-29er-hard-tail-carbon-bike-frame-disc-brake-Di2/113259_32673555837.html
seem to be same models, except weight: 100g difference.
Take a look, maybe you will find other differences.
These frames seem to be nice, but have low BB-drop: 53mm, so you will be sitting 5mm higher then usual.

Quote from: Eneen on September 06, 2017, 09:32:40 AM

This 009 accepts only 2.1 tires.

really? I did not see it written anywhere ... then I'll let it go, I usually use the 2.20.

Yep, info from heideli:
"our frame only fit for max 2.1 tire"

For me FR-216 is too short, only 585mm TT for 17"

This Thrust 01 seems prety nice, but there is no fork dimension and no supported tire width.

I'm currently for FR-200 (FR-202) as:
- it's cheap
- it's long
- axle-axle is 1116mm for 17"
- not so light so stronger
But waiting for info what tire fits.
And info about it is poor.

I'll make refresh here:
1. Do you know what tires can be fitted into this frame?
2. Did you have your frame replaced without issues?