Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - cmh

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 44
61
Component Deals & Selection / Re: New System for Tubeless Sealant
« on: June 05, 2016, 12:46:45 PM »
I don't have the Stan's tool, so I'm just using whatever pliers are close at hand.  I guess I need to cut a ~3 mm slot (or whatever it is) in an Ikea wrench.

Or get the thing that actually makes it easy for $9.

IIRC it's 4.5mm - before I got the Stan's tool I used a 4.5mm combination wrench, but that was still slow and fiddly.

My older set is gouged up a bit; I may be over tightening them when I put them back in, but I sure don't want the stem to work its way out.

Older set of valves? Spend the $10 and replace when they need it.

62
Fat Bikes / Re: Looking for input on rigid chiner fatty build
« on: June 02, 2016, 02:30:09 PM »
Suggestion is check out plus bikes as well. Fat bikes are cool, but they're not the miracle that many fat bike devotees will have you believe. Plus bikes (27.5+ or 29+) offer fat-ish 3" tires so you get some of the benefits of fat bikes without all that extra weight. I have a fat bike (have a detailed post in this forum) which I couldn't get much below 28 lbs with extensive work on weight weenie parts. Granted, aluminum frame, not Chiner carbon, but still...

Carbon Dude just got a Trek Stache and loves it so much he's trimming his stable and getting rid of bikes he won't ride anymore. Other folks I know have had really good things to say about the plus bikes. I'd ride one if I got a chance, but haven't had the chance yet.

About a month ago, I did a trip out in Utah, including Moab. Saw many, MANY bikes, and none of them were fat bikes, but I saw a bunch of plus bikes. Considering the plus bike thing is younger than the fat bike thing, that's pretty telling.

Beyond that, though, if you wanna do a rigid fatty, any of Peter's offerings at xmcarbonspeed look really good, and RVC has a really detailed buildup on his NASA themed bike. Worth a look.

63
Component Deals & Selection / Re: New System for Tubeless Sealant
« on: June 02, 2016, 01:44:15 PM »
I just saw this and am fairly impressed.  MilKit has taken a hard look at the tubeless mountain bike tire and how to best manage adding sealant.   They say the system is available in the US through Amazon.

Sweet merciful crap. $55.

I've actually tried almost exactly this with an $8 baster syringe very similar to this one.

I've found an old spoke to be excellent for checking sealant level, pull the valve core and use the threaded end as a dipstick. Barely have to do that, as I can get a pretty good idea of how much sealant is left by just shaking the tire.

"The Milkit valves keep the air inside, even without the valve core..." Uh. Okay. So how do you bleed down tire pressure? Or, for that matter, how would you even _measure_ tire pressure?

"...which makes fast inflation easier." No, it introduces some sort of flow restriction. I've had tires which wouldn't seat when the valve was installed but seated fine when I shot air in without the valve body in the way. I've got a blow gun I modified with a hose to a silca pump head which I use for seating tires because it delivers more air faster than a conventional inflator.

Cool that it uses the trapped air pressure to push out the sealant, I'll give it that, but I was able to accomplish the same by drawing up the basting syringe. Plus, such a skinny tube could clog very easily.

They show the guy refilling the syringe by drawing off the top of a filled Stan's scoop - so all the particles would be settled to the bottom and you'd just be injecting liquid sealant and reducing the sealing capability of the sealant for bigger holes.

Most definitely wouldn't work with the new Stan's race sealant. The "particles" are flat plastic strips about 1x5mm, and I have verified their claim that you can't shoot it through a valve body. Clogs that right up. I wonder how well even lightly clumped particles in the normal Stan's sealant would go through the injector body.

For filling, I still find the 2oz container of Stan's shot through the valve body (core removed) to be by far the best/easiest solution. Even the Stan's sealant injector was a disappointment.

Would be interested to hear the opinion of someone who has it/tried it, but I remain unconvinced this solves any problem that doesn't already have a cheaper solution.

Are the valve cores easier to remove?  They didn't mention that so maybe not.  My biggest complaint with the Stan's valves is that the cores can be a pain to remove and replace. 

Harder than other valves? It's the same type of valve, and it's the same valve core as others. Haven't found any issues with the Stan's valves when using the Stan's valve core remover, so not sure what issues you're running into.

64
After The Ride / Re: Chinese carbon biases
« on: June 02, 2016, 01:06:16 PM »
So, really, I have no issue riding a Chiner. No idiots around here  8)

Hey, hey, speak for yourself, buddy.  ;D

65
29+ & 27+ / Re: Trek Stache 7 First Ride
« on: June 02, 2016, 01:02:38 PM »
For me at least, I am not slower overall on the plus tires, and that's on a bike the weighs significantly more than my other bikes.  I feel that plus tires will become the norm and anything less than 2.4" will be "old school" tires, kinda like 26" wheels.

As you know, I have decided to sell my -057 and plan on using some of that money to purchase a set of 27.5" carbon wheels and 2.8" tires for my -036.

Yeah, I heard the same about fat bikes, too. If plus size tires were so great everywhere, curious why it's not showing up in World Cup XCO racing.

Love my trail bike, "big" 2.4" tires and long suspension, but going back to the agressive XC ride of the Epic with 29x2.0" tires... there's just something awesome about that.

But hey, nothing solves all problems, and whatever gets folks on bikes and enjoying themselves - that's the important part.


66
http://smile.amazon.com/Unknown-5510018-CatEye-Bottle-Cage/dp/B001C69Z5W

$6, pretty light, absolutely bombproof. Easy to get the bottle in and out, and I've never seen it lose a bottle.

67
29er / Re: Craig's .057
« on: May 31, 2016, 10:56:24 AM »
I was doing a little maintenance last night in preparation for a trip and discovered that my SP7 seatpost has come loose at the top. The bonding of the carbon to aluminum has failed.  :( It's only moving a little right now but I suspect it wont take much for it to get worse. This seems to be a fatigue failure because I have had no crash to speak of. If Peter will warranty it I will be going with the SP6 to avoid any such problem in the future.

On a brighter note: I just replaced the tires, cassette, chainrings and chain. I went with 2.35 Maxxis IKON's and they fit the frame no problem. I hope I like them cause they where damn expensive.  ;D
I had the same on my seatpost (aliexpress version). Glued it and it holds for more than a year now. http://chinertown.com/index.php/topic,184.msg2838.html#msg2838

Way back in the day I had a Slingshot frame (still have the frame) which needed a long 31.6mm post. At that point, the only options which were available were crazy expensive, especially since I was working at a bike shop at the time and getting paid very close to nothing. All I had on hand was 27.2 and 26.8mm posts. A Specialized Allez carbon was brought in for warranty work. Happened to notice the OD of the bike's down tube was 31.6mm, and the ID matched a post I had on hand. Cut the post down to about 2", sanded the finish off, then epoxied it in place to the end of the down tube, turning the small aluminum post into a long carbon post. I still have that seat post!

So yeah, you can definitely epoxy that thing back together.

68
29+ & 27+ / Re: Trek Stache 7 First Ride
« on: May 31, 2016, 10:48:59 AM »
Surprising video relevant to this discussion:



I would not have guessed the results that they get.

69
29er / Re: IP-036 Build for my Girlfriend
« on: May 31, 2016, 10:42:41 AM »
Nice choice of color!

+2 on that. Looks reminiscent of the old SID Blue. Always liked that color, had repainted my Karate Monkey from poo brown to almost that exact color.

70
Not to start a religious war, or contradict the old guard, but the PF30 and BB92 of my bikes work perfectly.
Changing the bearings are easy with a cheap M16 bolt, and without risk of cross threading.
I have BSA friends who creaks while mines don't.

This, exactly. I haven't used BB30 yet but have run PF30 and BB92 (and Trek's variation of it, BB something or other) and have no complaints. Routine maintenance it necessary for any BB standard. The whole reason we have new standards is because the old ones would creak after enough time.

Quote
The only thing I wouldn't do again, is to choose a 30mm axle with a BB92.
The bearings are too small and not standard.

Have RaceFace Cinch on the wife's bike with the BB92 shell - the same setup, and it's been remarkably reliable considering the smaller bearing size. Probably not have such luck under me at almost 2x the weight, but no complaints about the 30mm/BB92 combo on her bike, especially as it makes the silly light RF Next SL cranks an option for her.

71
29er / Re: Carbon Integrated Handlebar for MTB
« on: May 12, 2016, 11:51:05 AM »
I've seen enough mentions of broken handlebars on here that the combo of a 225lb rider and a chinese bar/stem combo kinda terrifies me.

Bars from reputable sellers like Peter have broken (see my comment on xcbarny's link above) and a $42 set of no-name bars on aliexpress... *shivers*

The only name brand I could find that does integrated bars and stems is Ritchey. None of the others seem to do it - no idea if it's because it locks in your geometry and allows no customization, or if there are any other reasons that the big names don't do it... but they don't. Even the weight weenie parts on Fairwheel Bikes doesn't have any integrated, and that's where I'd expect it the most - the niche builders of the superlightweight stuff.

So yeah, I'd suggest a huge amount of caution.

72
Component Deals & Selection / Re: New Fox 32
« on: May 12, 2016, 09:19:42 AM »
Now I'm regretting a little bit that I didn't wait for a new model but who would have known ... Going sub 3 pounds (around 1350g) on 29er fork is huge:
http://reviews.mtbr.com/fox-32-step-cast-fork

New options for heavier models (34,36 and 40) are also very nice

Saw this, trying to figure out how to raise the $$ to get it for the wife's bike - she loves her Fox fork, and losing 260g off of that? I forget the exact numbers but that should get her 1x Scale to low 18lbs.

Anyone wanna buy a Motobecane fat bike?

73
29er / Re: Chinese Carbon 29er Pic Thread.
« on: May 12, 2016, 09:03:48 AM »
Glad to see this place is doing well. Joined 2 years ago near launch and impressed with some of the beautiful builds and info here.
Rather than bumping my original build thread for a single pic figure Id add it to this thread.

HAHAHAHAHA... nice work with the King Slayer name. I like it.

74
29er / Re: IP-036 Build for my Girlfriend
« on: May 12, 2016, 08:56:20 AM »
Until Shimano comes out with 1x11 SLX, the best deal on a 1x11 drivetrain is the SRAM GX, I've seen a complete drivetrain group with M1400 cranks for $469 on eBay.  This was new out of Asia, so you would need to wait a bit for shipping.  I was a big fan of Shimano drivetrains until I drank the SRAM 1x11 Kool-Aid, I was hooked.  Since you are getting new wheels anyway, just find a set with an XD driver and you will be good to go with a 10x42 cassette.

Same here - had tried SRAM several times and kept using Shimano - until 1x... now I've got a SRAM drivetrain, and after seeing the XTR 1x stuff, I'm okay with sticking on the SRAM.

75
29+ & 27+ / Re: Can 29er MTB frame assembled with 27.5er wheels?
« on: April 29, 2016, 07:01:57 AM »
Curious if the new Stan's race formula would have sealed that larger hole. Got some and started testing it.

http://www.notubes.com/Stans-Race-Sealant-Quart-P1977.aspx

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 44