Author Topic: Velobuild VB-R-177  (Read 80879 times)

Serge_K

Re: Velobuild VB-R-177
« Reply #390 on: August 21, 2023, 10:20:55 AM »
It does not (at least mine didn't), but I ended up designing and printing a cap:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/6bgkpoy94cq7as3radns1/non-aero-top-cap-v3.STL?rlkey=gmaimol7bm771slfgn2v7wayp&dl=0

Thanks! I wish i had that a few months ago!
Fast on the flat. And nowhere else.

jakob

Re: Velobuild VB-R-177
« Reply #391 on: October 12, 2023, 01:37:40 PM »
Anyone knows to which Geo the vb177 ist similar to? Someone mentioned the sl7? Anyone other information?

JanU

Re: Velobuild VB-R-177
« Reply #392 on: October 12, 2023, 01:56:32 PM »
Geo of R 177 is similar to Scott Addict.

ENEP

Re: Velobuild VB-R-177
« Reply #393 on: October 16, 2023, 04:07:07 AM »

Finished up my 177 build a couple of weeks ago and have been making a few final aesthetic touches.

Overall, really happy with how it turned out and how it rides. Zero issues putting the build together. Moved most of the parts over from my 168 except for the Magene Exar Ultra wheels which are new, carbon saddle from AliX and tubeless version of the Goodyear Eagle F1s I was running prior (which were constantly getting flats btw).

VeloBuild VB-R-177 frame
Magene EXAR Ultra 50/58 wheelset
Magene P325CS Dual PM
Hammerhead Karoo 2 computer
Magene L508 radar light
ZTTO BB86 threaded ceramic BB
MIXED Ultra Light 7D MAX Carbon Saddle 140MM
Goodyear Eagle F1 tubeless tires
11sp Di2 frankenmix
L-TWOO ospw

Really happy I made the switch, the 177 is not only a bit lighter but the main highlight coming over from the 168 I would say is how much stiffer it feels. I also like that although I think it's modelled after a Scott Addict, it looks a bit more unique given how common the SL7 which the 168 is designed after is. I think it's Velobuilds best road frame.

Currently using the original HB011 bars from my 168 which I'm considering swapping as it's the only piece with noticeable flex now that I have a stiffer frame and wheels. Only issue I had was that the moulding where the rear hanger outer piece goes seems to have some excess material, which changes the angle of the thread a bit and make the TA screw in a bit tougher than it should be. Aside from that, everything was smooth.

https://imgur.com/mtYh8Sh
https://imgur.com/mdJxEXI
https://imgur.com/tvRp4Ns
https://imgur.com/NpP7zyz
https://imgur.com/KhaujkN
https://imgur.com/pW3z35v








Would you say that the 177 is harsher to ride, because being stiffer than 168?

hazzer19

Re: Velobuild VB-R-177
« Reply #394 on: October 20, 2023, 10:56:47 PM »
Would you say that the 177 is harsher to ride, because being stiffer than 168?


Not at all. The 177 feels stiffer but not uncomfortable IMO.

benquick

Re: Velobuild VB-R-177
« Reply #395 on: October 25, 2023, 04:32:33 AM »
Hi, I have been lurking in this thread for a while, but now finally the time has come to assemble my own VB-R-177. I received the frame few days ago, but I am largely still waiting for other parts. One of the things that arrived in my mail today was the bottom bracket. It came with a ~2mm spacer, that I am unsure whether it is needed, or which side of the bottom bracket I should put it on. I am attaching an image to make sure you understand what I mean.

I have a Shimano 105 R7100 crankset, and I will be running the L-TWOO eR9 groupset. How would I determine whether I need to put on this spacer? Did you put one on when you were assembling this frame?
« Last Edit: October 25, 2023, 11:06:22 AM by benquick »

gabbia

Re: Velobuild VB-R-177
« Reply #396 on: October 25, 2023, 06:53:42 AM »
Hi all,
i'm looking to purcase a new frame and i like the 177 geometry (very close to my bianchi XR4 size 59)
can someone share a picture of a XL size to see how it's look?
thanks

Ahuevos

Re: Velobuild VB-R-177
« Reply #397 on: October 25, 2023, 07:04:00 AM »
How is the stiffness of this frame, have you done the test of trying to join the fork and rear chainstays with your hands? That's my biggest concern with these framesets

patliean1

Re: Velobuild VB-R-177
« Reply #398 on: October 25, 2023, 08:23:52 AM »
How is the stiffness of this frame, have you done the test of trying to join the fork and rear chainstays with your hands? That's my biggest concern with these framesets

You have now asked this question in multiple threads. Almost verbatim each time. What are you looking to accomplish by asking this?

Ahuevos

Re: Velobuild VB-R-177
« Reply #399 on: October 25, 2023, 08:52:39 AM »
You have now asked this question in multiple threads. Almost verbatim each time. What are you looking to accomplish by asking this?
I'm sorry, I'm just looking for more accurate information on the frame I have studied to buy. It would be the first time I buy one

Ahuevos

Re: Velobuild VB-R-177
« Reply #400 on: October 31, 2023, 02:09:08 PM »
Do you know if there is a straight seatpost for this frame? Seatpost without backset?

ENEP

Re: Velobuild VB-R-177
« Reply #401 on: October 31, 2023, 02:39:16 PM »
Do you know if there is a straight seatpost for this frame? Seatpost without backset?

This frame uses a standard round 27,2mm seat post. You can replace it with any 27,2mm seat post.

Liter

Re: Velobuild VB-R-177
« Reply #402 on: November 01, 2023, 09:08:13 AM »
Do you know if there is a straight seatpost for this frame? Seatpost without backset?

Answering your previous question, your test is useless, makes no sense joining by hand fork or chainstays, been riding this thing for 1 year, no issues and on roads with a lot of potholes. you can by a seatpost without setback, just order the frame without a seatpost.

hazzer19

Re: Velobuild VB-R-177
« Reply #403 on: November 02, 2023, 05:48:33 PM »
Do you know if there is a straight seatpost for this frame? Seatpost without backset?


You may be able to get one from VB if you ask for it with your order

Ahuevos

Re: Velobuild VB-R-177
« Reply #404 on: November 06, 2023, 03:40:30 PM »
Studying the geometry of this frame I have a doubt, according to my biomechanic, my reach is 386, in this frame it would be size XS, but I see a very short down tube, it seems strange to me.
In velobuild 168 is something more normal.