Author Topic: Velobuild GF-002  (Read 231425 times)

coffeebreak

Re: Velobuild GF-002
« Reply #75 on: April 06, 2023, 11:10:07 AM »
Actually, the dust cap cannot sit flush with the head tube because it rotates with the handlebar. So every time you turn your handle it is going to grind against the tube, however smooth or light it is and pretty soon it will eat through the paint and start touching carbon. The gap has to be there, how much you are comfortable with is the question. You can take it to a bike shop and ask for advice, also look at brand name bikes which have ICR and similar dust cap situation. There is a slight gap that remains.

I had about 2mm of gap in exact same spot and no matter what I couldn't get rid of it. I see that you have not assembled the stem/spacer/handle yet. Suggest you to tighten the full assembly as if you are readying the bike to ride and then check the gap again. This was suggested to me by someone. I did that and still had a gap that looked ungainly. After back and forth emails with Chris the matter led to nowhere because that gap seemed okay to him... may be it is okay, who knows? It certainly looked too big to me so I started seeking help here and some other forums. All my "hacks" for this are written here in the past few pages.

Long story short, as per suggestion from a member here I took my bike to someone who has a vertical press type grinder (I don't know what it is called) and after some brainstorming, decided to shave off 0.8mm of material from underneath the dust cap. Not the whole bottom of the dust cap but just the part that rests on C-ring so basically keep the flange of the dust cap intact but remove some material within the flange. The other option was to find dust cap and C-ring combo that is slightly shorter in height, which I was not. It could be there but I wasn't able to find that would be a perfect fit for this frame. That is a problem with Chiner frames because you searching with frame model yields zero results on eBay, Amazon, AliEx or the likes.

I have circled the area in your picture that we grinded from the dust cap. I was advised here to not use any home made remedy, namely Dremel or angle grinder because it is near impossible to shave off material in that spot in perfectly flat manner. Its rather tricky.

You are right about the customer support. If it gets tricky like this, you are on your own. They just stop replying. There was no answer to play in the handlebar (while rocking the bike back and forth) but that is whole another chapter.

To summarize, tighten things to 100% and observe the gap, if its still too much look into dust cap modification OR you can find a dust cap/C-ring that are not as tall as what VB supplies. Its been a while, may be there is some headset that is better than VB's.

carbonazza

Re: Velobuild GF-002
« Reply #76 on: April 06, 2023, 04:05:14 PM »
Actually, the dust cap cannot sit flush with the head tube because it rotates with the handlebar. So every time you turn your handle it is going to grind against the tube...
Until the 1.5" tops were common, the cover was generally flush or grinding as you say.
And there was 0.25mm shims coming with the headset to put some space if needed.
Enough to not touch but not too much to expose the bearings.


electrolux

Re: Velobuild GF-002
« Reply #77 on: April 08, 2023, 07:00:59 AM »
I am considering purchasing this frame however I'm not liking the issues I have seen people have with both the integrated and separate bars Velobuild provides. I've seen too many reports of excessive flex.

I dont really want to go for a seperate stem, integrated just looks too good and is worth the hassle in my book. :D

Does anyone have any suggestions for an alternative fully integrated bar?

Thanks!

EDIT: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005004650603001.html?

Seems like a decent option from a known brand. Their CS-1300 Spacers look to be compatible with the frame too.
« Last Edit: April 08, 2023, 07:17:16 AM by electrolux »

hazzer19

Re: Velobuild GF-002
« Reply #78 on: April 08, 2023, 05:41:38 PM »
Finally think I resolved the loose headset issue on my GF-002 with separate bar/stem using the new C ring. Wrote the update on the dedicated thread here: http://chinertown.com/index.php/topic,3683.msg45151.html#msg45151

bichler.bua

Re: Velobuild GF-002
« Reply #79 on: April 11, 2023, 05:03:27 AM »
Actually, the dust cap cannot sit flush with the head tube because it rotates with the handlebar. So every time you turn your handle it is going to grind against the tube, however smooth or light it is and pretty soon it will eat through the paint and start touching carbon. The gap has to be there, how much you are comfortable with is the question. You can take it to a bike shop and ask for advice, also look at brand name bikes which have ICR and similar dust cap situation. There is a slight gap that remains.

I had about 2mm of gap in exact same spot and no matter what I couldn't get rid of it. I see that you have not assembled the stem/spacer/handle yet. Suggest you to tighten the full assembly as if you are readying the bike to ride and then check the gap again. This was suggested to me by someone. I did that and still had a gap that looked ungainly. After back and forth emails with Chris the matter led to nowhere because that gap seemed okay to him... may be it is okay, who knows? It certainly looked too big to me so I started seeking help here and some other forums. All my "hacks" for this are written here in the past few pages.

Long story short, as per suggestion from a member here I took my bike to someone who has a vertical press type grinder (I don't know what it is called) and after some brainstorming, decided to shave off 0.8mm of material from underneath the dust cap. Not the whole bottom of the dust cap but just the part that rests on C-ring so basically keep the flange of the dust cap intact but remove some material within the flange. The other option was to find dust cap and C-ring combo that is slightly shorter in height, which I was not. It could be there but I wasn't able to find that would be a perfect fit for this frame. That is a problem with Chiner frames because you searching with frame model yields zero results on eBay, Amazon, AliEx or the likes.

I have circled the area in your picture that we grinded from the dust cap. I was advised here to not use any home made remedy, namely Dremel or angle grinder because it is near impossible to shave off material in that spot in perfectly flat manner. Its rather tricky.

You are right about the customer support. If it gets tricky like this, you are on your own. They just stop replying. There was no answer to play in the handlebar (while rocking the bike back and forth) but that is whole another chapter.

To summarize, tighten things to 100% and observe the gap, if its still too much look into dust cap modification OR you can find a dust cap/C-ring that are not as tall as what VB supplies. Its been a while, may be there is some headset that is better than VB's.
Good input, appreciate it - thanks to everybody. Current status: it is hard to cut the fork to length when the tolerances are not finally sorted.
I opted for a Vision / FSA SMR stem since I do not trust the VeloBuild stem & top cap design when it comes to removing play of the headset.
Bought this spacer set from AliExpress:
https://aliexpress.com/item/1005003797505110.html
created a wooden jig to have a plain offset, used my routing machine to take off material from the top, leaving pins to interface to the FSA spacers.
Filled the bottom with epoxy and removed material, again, so the compression ring recesses into the cover.
Will now cut the fork to length and keep you updated...

ENEP

Re: Velobuild GF-002
« Reply #80 on: April 13, 2023, 08:01:12 AM »
Curious if anybody has built up a GF002 with fully internal routing and integrated handelbar while using mechanical shifting and mechanical disc brakes?
Meaning four cables fully internally routed. Is it possible with good braking results, compared to rim brake?
(I don't mind spending a little extra cash for suitable wires/hoses or more time while building)

Thank you

« Last Edit: April 13, 2023, 08:26:39 AM by ENEP »

coffeebreak

Re: Velobuild GF-002
« Reply #81 on: April 13, 2023, 08:56:53 AM »
Curious if anybody has built up a GF002 with fully internal routing and integrated handelbar while using mechanical shifting and mechanical disc brakes?
Meaning four cables fully internally routed. Is it possible with good braking results, compared to rim brake?


I did this. Mechanical Ultegra R8000/6800 and mechanical disc brake (Onirii BR005). It took me a while to figure out rotor and pad combo for optimal performance but now it's really good. I can lock the wheels in emergency. The levers aren't as snappy as with an external routed rim brake bike but it is good enough considering crazy bends in the bar and stem. I have VB's separate stem and bar. So far so good.

s3si1u

Re: Velobuild GF-002
« Reply #82 on: April 13, 2023, 12:32:30 PM »
Curious if anybody has built up a GF002 with fully internal routing and integrated handelbar while using mechanical shifting and mechanical disc brakes?
Meaning four cables fully internally routed. Is it possible with good braking results, compared to rim brake?
(I don't mind spending a little extra cash for suitable wires/hoses or more time while building)

Thank you

I originally built up my 177 this way with the same handlebar, Juin Techs and Sensah Empire. 10/10 don't recommend mechanical disc brakes with fully internal routing, but YMMV. Yes, you can get it to "good enough", which is totally dependent on your style of riding, but that still isn't like full hydro or even good rim brakes and I was never quite comfortable enough on downhills and tight turns at speed. One scare/mild accident was more than enough for me to decide hydraulic braking is the way for discs.
Another bit I can share is I had a lot of difficulty running 4 housings through the bars, I can only imagine how much more difficult it would be with compressionless housing.
I also did the math, when I stopped to think about the cost of something like Sensah shifters, Juin Tech calipers, rotors, fancy housing, high quality brake cables, tons of troubleshooting, etc....just a bit more money would have gotten me a good pair of hydraulic SRAM or Shimano shifters/brakes that are mostly plug and play.  ::) ::) Bleeding is not hard at all. Also considering the steadily dropping cost of LTwoo stuff, I'm not so sure there's much upside to cable disc brakes on fully internal/performance/aero bikes anymore.
« Last Edit: April 13, 2023, 12:34:21 PM by s3si1u »
Instagram: @aerosloth

coffeebreak

Re: Velobuild GF-002
« Reply #83 on: April 13, 2023, 08:07:19 PM »
Depends a lot on the frame, especially on the rear triangle. GF002 doesn't have extreme angle towards the brake caliper once cable exits the port. There's a slight curve but that's it.

s3si1u

Re: Velobuild GF-002
« Reply #84 on: April 13, 2023, 08:45:39 PM »
Depends a lot on the frame, especially on the rear triangle. GF002 doesn't have extreme angle towards the brake caliper once cable exits the port. There's a slight curve but that's it.

I'd argue the many tight bends and potential forcing of the brake housings through the handlebars and then the headtube has a much more adverse effect on braking performance than the brake cable exit for a fully internal frame

ENEP

Re: Velobuild GF-002
« Reply #85 on: April 14, 2023, 04:26:22 AM »
I originally built up my 177 this way with the same handlebar, Juin Techs and Sensah Empire. 10/10 don't recommend mechanical disc brakes with fully internal routing, but YMMV. Yes, you can get it to "good enough", which is totally dependent on your style of riding, but that still isn't like full hydro or even good rim brakes and I was never quite comfortable enough on downhills and tight turns at speed. One scare/mild accident was more than enough for me to decide hydraulic braking is the way for discs.
Another bit I can share is I had a lot of difficulty running 4 housings through the bars, I can only imagine how much more difficult it would be with compressionless housing.
I also did the math, when I stopped to think about the cost of something like Sensah shifters, Juin Tech calipers, rotors, fancy housing, high quality brake cables, tons of troubleshooting, etc....just a bit more money would have gotten me a good pair of hydraulic SRAM or Shimano shifters/brakes that are mostly plug and play.  ::) ::) Bleeding is not hard at all. Also considering the steadily dropping cost of LTwoo stuff, I'm not so sure there's much upside to cable disc brakes on fully internal/performance/aero bikes anymore.

Thank you greatly for your comment and insights.
I already have a complete Shimano 105 R7000 groupset, upgrading it to hydraulic with new 105 shifters and calipers would cost me around 450€, while a set of Juin Tech F1 with rotors would only cost me 160€. Quite the difference in price. However the braking performance should of course not be neglected. I live in a area which is very flat and my performance/speeds are quite average so i'm guessing that mechanical disc brakes might be "good enough", most likely better or similiar to current Shimano R7000 105 rim brakes.

I don't mind the hassle/complexity of building and servicing as I really love the looks of integrated handelbars and fully internal routed cables but need to decide if it's worth it regarding braking performance.

Re: Velobuild GF-002
« Reply #86 on: May 29, 2023, 03:16:34 PM »
Hi all - We just posted an updated regarding a newly designed c ring here: http://chinertown.com/index.php/topic,4183.msg46386.html#msg46386

Please check it out!

bichler.bua

Re: Velobuild GF-002
« Reply #87 on: July 18, 2023, 09:44:54 AM »
Wanted to share my Velobuild GF-002 build and experiences with the community.

Ordered the frameset in winter, during cross season as you can tell, asked for a custom paintjob on the fork.
As noted in quite a few comments, the paint job is okay but not spectacular. In fact I pointed out many times to Chris, that I want the fork to appear red from the front – with the result being a clearly visible yellow-red when looking at the bike from the front. Considering the 50US$ for the paintjob, this is okay – but it just is not a perfect result that I originally was looking for.

Frameset was missing some hardware, after discussing with Chris they sent the hardware but without instruction – so I am not clear what the hardware is for. Since my final setup is 1 x electrical I did not have to bother, but this is inline with the entire Velobuild experience (I already own a VB-R-099).

Frameset was shipped with the v2 compression C ring and like I commented here https://chinertown.com/index.php/topic,3499.msg44919.html#msg44919, this left me with a huge gap between top cap and steerer tube. No comment from Chris or Velobuild and since I already lost confidence in the Velobuild stem (opted for the separate stem and bar due to flexibility for bar flare) I went for my own construction as described here https://chinertown.com/index.php/topic,3499.msg45210.html#msg45210: Bought a FSA SMR stem and an AliExpress spacer set and with some tools and jigs created an adapter from C ring v2 to the FSA spacer set. Cut the fork to length, assembly and integrated Di2, hydraulic cable routing worked without an issue. No headset play since then.

Not many rides, yet, but I am very positive, so far: The 130mm stem gives me a sporty geometry, but not too aggressive. Drop from saddle to bar is good enough for endurance rides without being too relaxed. Agile steering behavior without being nervous, very stiff bottom bracket area but the long seatpost (1.95m height, 96cm inseam, 90kg) and the 45mm tires just create enough compliance.

Overall a frame I can recommend since I believe it can be tuned quite a lot with different stem options. My Velobuild verdict also remains the same: nice frames at a very good price point, just do not expect perfection in support and be prepared and skilled enough for assembly and fixing issues. Having users figuring out the compression C ring version, multiple tolerances on various frames and the separate stem design is annoying – even if there’s progress I can not consider this a fix that works for the mass market out there.

  • Velobuild GF-002 size XL
  • DT Swiss G 1800 spline 650b DB 25 wheels, Ratchet LN freehub
  • Pirelli Cinturato Gravel H 45-584, Butyl tubes
  • FSA SMR stem 130mm
  • Zipp Service Course SL-70 XPLR bar 420mm
  • Velobuild seatpost
  • Selle Italia SLR team edition flow Ti-rail
  • Shimano ST-R785 Di2, hydraulic brifters
  • Shimano GRX RD-RX815 rear derailleur
  • SRAM Rival PG-1130 11-36, 11-speed cassette
  • Easton EC90SL crank 175mm, Garbaruk 42T chainring
  • ZTTO BB386 PF30 ceramic bearing bottom bracket
  • Shimano PD-ES600 SPD pedal
  • KMC X11SL chain
  • ZRACE XG flat mount disc brake
  • Shimano SM-RT64 brake disc 160mm
« Last Edit: July 18, 2023, 09:51:02 AM by bichler.bua »

jcr

Re: Velobuild GF-002
« Reply #88 on: July 19, 2023, 10:38:04 PM »
Do people recommend getting their integrated bar and stem or get the two piece or none of the above ?

multipower1

Re: Velobuild GF-002
« Reply #89 on: January 16, 2024, 08:51:04 AM »
Hey Everyone,

I'm new to this forum, currently working on a built of the Velobuild GF-002.

I'm having extrem issues routing the Di2 cable (EW-SD50) through the right chainstay. The plug off the cable just doesn't fit through the narrowest part. A shifting housing can be pushed through with force. I've tried all the special tools for routing, but the plug just won't fit.

Anybody has experienced similar issues with the GF-002?

Additionally, my frame came without the two "doors" in the down tube. Under the bottom bracket and next to head tube. Chris said they have been doing this since two years, but all the pictures I see of Gf-002 builts have those.

Anybody also received a frame without the doors? I'm wondering if this particular frame I received is just a lemon.

Thanks, appreciate any help.