Author Topic: Seraph Bikes Superlight 836g X68 - Alternative to SL8 Fakes?  (Read 1476105 times)

Ride56

Re: Seraph Bikes Superlight 836g X68 - Alternative to SL8 Fakes?
« Reply #1920 on: February 01, 2026, 12:38:56 PM »
How long was your delivery time and what was the final price you payed?
@all is there any kind of promo code available right now? Couldn't find anything on the web.

Tantan received the money via bank transfer on 30.10.25, I received pictures of the painted frame 09.12.25 and received everything 30.12.25
Frame 589USD
Paint 140USD
Shipping with groupset 180USD incl. tax and tarrifs
Bank transfer fee 50 USD

TidyDinosaur

Re: Seraph Bikes Superlight 836g X68 - Alternative to SL8 Fakes?
« Reply #1921 on: February 01, 2026, 12:52:30 PM »
Yeah, the threading for the bottom bracket on the right side became loose, got a lot of radial play..


Seems like universe wants to punish me for buying chinese fakes :D

I had the same happen to my Hygge frame. It's actually fairly easy to fix yourself if you're not afraid to tackle that kind of job.
I took out the sleeve, cleaned everything very good and used 2K glue (of a very good brand) to glue it back in.

fhill

Re: Seraph Bikes Superlight 836g X68 - Alternative to SL8 Fakes?
« Reply #1922 on: February 01, 2026, 02:28:16 PM »
I had the same happen to my Hygge frame. It's actually fairly easy to fix yourself if you're not afraid to tackle that kind of job.
I took out the sleeve, cleaned everything very good and used 2K glue (of a very good brand) to glue it back in.

Think I'll give it a try, but TanTan agreed to send me a new frame for shipping costs, frame only, no fork, no other stuff

Dan S.

Re: Seraph Bikes Superlight 836g X68 - Alternative to SL8 Fakes?
« Reply #1923 on: February 02, 2026, 02:05:30 AM »
Think I'll give it a try, but TanTan agreed to send me a new frame for shipping costs, frame only, no fork, no other stuff

Tbh quite aight customer support, even tho they could have covered those shipping fees themselves.

TidyDinosaur

Re: Seraph Bikes Superlight 836g X68 - Alternative to SL8 Fakes?
« Reply #1924 on: February 02, 2026, 04:22:41 AM »
Tbh quite aight customer support, even tho they could have covered those shipping fees themselves.

Well, the reply from Hygge was : "Fix it yourself", so Tantan's offers seems better  :)

fhill

Re: Seraph Bikes Superlight 836g X68 - Alternative to SL8 Fakes?
« Reply #1925 on: February 05, 2026, 10:01:03 AM »
Frame arrived here...

874g matte black size 56 without any metal parts

Which is exactly annoying as fuck. Got to mount that f..king front derailleur mount myself..

Also ordered  a new fork with, weighs in at 410g uncut, will try to build up the frame in the next two weeks, hopefully the brake hoses from the former are still long enough...

rawr4252

Re: Seraph Bikes Superlight 836g X68 - Alternative to SL8 Fakes?
« Reply #1926 on: February 05, 2026, 12:56:58 PM »
I just received by x68 and there appears to be a carbon fiber lip in the seat tube that is preventing me from installing my DI2 battery far enough down in the tube to adjust my seat height. I suspect this is where 2 different carbon parts were joined together.

Is this fixable? I think cutting my seatpost shorter and drilling new di2 holder holes will not get me the minimum depth required.

Update: GCN's sandpaper on a stick approach didnt work. I ended ramming the carbon fiber lip with a metal pole until it shattered to pieces. Not exactly an elegant solution.

s3si1u

Re: Seraph Bikes Superlight 836g X68 - Alternative to SL8 Fakes?
« Reply #1927 on: February 05, 2026, 02:33:21 PM »
I've had my friend's X68 in size 49 sitting in the hallway while I find some time to paint it. Figured I should take some weights.
Fork: 406g
Bars: 345g
Seatpost: 166g
Frame: 841g with hardware, 804g without

Some rough spots in the bearing seats and rear dropouts but otherwise looks good on visual inspection.
Instagram: @aerosloth

offspring_fan

Re: Seraph Bikes Superlight 836g X68 - Alternative to SL8 Fakes?
« Reply #1928 on: February 05, 2026, 03:16:38 PM »
Update: GCN's sandpaper on a stick approach didnt work. I ended ramming the carbon fiber lip with a metal pole until it shattered to pieces. Not exactly an elegant solution.

Love it! That's one way of giving the frame an initial stress test  ;D

SkylarRnD

Re: Seraph Bikes Superlight 836g X68 - Alternative to SL8 Fakes?
« Reply #1929 on: February 06, 2026, 08:22:26 AM »
Ive gotta admit I have moved on from this bike. It just never felt confidence inspiring while descending. I tried everything to fix the softness I would get when descending at speed. Different wheels/tires helped but there was always a slight wobble, especially if a light crosswind. I'm no slouch on descending, nor am I a noob at riding bikes.
I got a really good deal on a Van Rysel RCR Pro with SRAM Force group. Its been flawless. Zipp 303SW wheels feel great but I'm thinking of selling them to get something with a hooked design(Probably Caden CDAs).

Anyway, I still have to X68 and it is a Certified Fast Bike on the flats. Mine just left me feeling sketchy down the hills.

tiz92

Re: Seraph Bikes Superlight 836g X68 - Alternative to SL8 Fakes?
« Reply #1930 on: February 07, 2026, 02:40:28 PM »
I have around 13.000 km on my X68 now. Got it in may 2025. Still no issues. It just does what it needs to do.


SkylarRnD

Re: Seraph Bikes Superlight 836g X68 - Alternative to SL8 Fakes?
« Reply #1932 on: February 09, 2026, 08:33:10 PM »
Yea I'm glad all of yours are working flawlessly, but something is off about mine.

Sander2177

Re: Seraph Bikes Superlight 836g X68 - Alternative to SL8 Fakes?
« Reply #1933 on: February 09, 2026, 11:10:32 PM »
Yea I'm glad all of yours are working flawlessly, but something is off about mine.

Ok you post this say there is something off then dont say what is off!

glepore

Re: Seraph Bikes Superlight 836g X68 - Alternative to SL8 Fakes?
« Reply #1934 on: February 10, 2026, 08:14:46 AM »
He's got a handling issue, descending at speed.
There are similar complaints from folks on ww about the actual sl8. Not a majority of people, but some folks seem to have an issue while the majority don't. No one has ever identified the source. Lots of speculation about weight, location of cog and aero issues but nothing definitive. There are enough reports though that I don't write it off.
I suspect its more of a position/rider weight/ geo interaction than the frame itself given the reports, but who knows?

Mine's been fine.