New TanTan Aero Frame TT-X65

[joegal]

Just saw this new frame, Looks interesting.

Super light Disc Aero frame   

Frame: TT-X65 (disc road frame )
Axle:100*12mm,142*12mm
Material: Full Toray T1000
BB: T47 thread 

Headset: 1-/2" (Top ),1-/2" (Down)
Sizes:45/48/50/52/54/56cm
Frame Weight : 1037/+-40g(50cm)
Fork Weight :  447/+-40g
Seatpost Weight : 195/+-20g
Max Tire Size: 700*32C

http://tantancycling.com/index.php?_m=mod_product&_a=view&p_id=1185

[Serge_K]

Pretty sure the "full T1000" is an outright lie, but other than that, looks very nice.

[planet_sammy]

You find also an InstaReel from Viviantian about the Frame https://www.instagram.com/share/BAM9V1fpsq

[Sander2177]

1Love they always say superlight lol at 1037g +/- 40g!  Think it looks ok but always better when you get to see fully built

[Cnasta]

I really think they should stop calling everything Super light / ligthweight when it isn't. I mean, for a full out aero frame it is not bad, but superlight is not what it is. Furthermore, the weigth is mentioned for the babysize triple xs. Average size (52 / 54 / 56) will be a bit heavier, making it go to 1100/1200gr probably. [edit] fair enough, as pointed out below, size S is closer to 52, not that small, but still not lightweight by any means [/edit]

The seatpost/sadle clamp looks different. Not sure whether I like that, but visually better than the TT-style sliding rail (like the x38 foil-clones).

[brnrth]

Beautiful frame. Looks very similar to the Winspace C5 Aero. However, it has minimal differences in geometry.

[BalticSea]

I really think they should stop calling everything Super light / ligthweight when it isn't. I mean, for a full out aero frame it is not bad, but superlight is not what it is. Furthermore, the weigth is mentioned for the babysize triple xs. Average size (52 / 54 / 56) will be a bit heavier, making it go to 1100/1200gr probably.

The seatpost/sadle clamp looks different. Not sure whether I like that, but visually better than the TT-style sliding rail (like the x38 foil-clones).

The advertised weight is for size 50/M, which is a closer to traditional size S/52

[toxin]

That seatpost is just unnecessary, just make a simple 0 offset 2 bolt, idk why they're making it so bulky and complicated. Rear end came straight from bross zenith but that's fine. Bb area should be deeper for an aero bike. Fork design and integration leaves much to be desired compared to big brands, but I guess it's pretty good for a cheap, unbranded frame with limited development. Probably one of the better cheap aero bikes, we're starting to get somewhere

[Lotnik]

Pretty god for cheap I confirmed the price with TanTan: T-X65 frame 359usd/set . include frame+fork+seatpost+headset

There's another new frame X-67.

[Gloopann]

Pretty god for cheap I confirmed the price with TanTan: T-X65 frame 359usd/set . include frame+fork+seatpost+headset

There's another new frame X-67.

I'd actually prefer the look of the X67 if it lost the stupid channels on top of the seatstay connection. This makes it look like they are just trying to copy the seka spear but only had 2 minutes to come up with the design.

[Cnasta]

The advertised weight is for size 50/M, which is a closer to traditional size S/52

Touché, I take that back. Rest still stands

[toxin]

Pretty god for cheap I confirmed the price with TanTan: T-X65 frame 359usd/set . include frame+fork+seatpost+headset

There's another new frame X-67.

That price makes no sense

[patliean1]

-The bottom bracket and downtube design of their X38 (Scott Foil clone)
-Seatpost/clamp design of their X34 (Trek Madone clone)
-Channeled seatstays and fork resembling some other brand I'm sure.

Overall it looks like the sum of all leftover design elements bonded together. Not a bad looking frame however.

[rasch]

That price makes no sense

Doesn't include handlebar likely so pushes price down a bit. Plus u add paint and shipping

[Lotnik]

Doesn't include handlebar likely so pushes price down a bit. Plus u add paint and shipping

Correct