Author Topic: Lightcarbon LCR020 35c clearance aero frame  (Read 66178 times)

JensenMacD

Re: Lightcarbon LCR020 35c clearance aero frame
« Reply #90 on: July 13, 2026, 08:41:10 AM »
Between the v2 and v3 catalogue, some geo changes

AI condensed it for me

LCR020-D Geometry Update

✅ Size range expanded
Added 470 size (smaller riders)
Added 610 size (taller riders)

✅ Smaller sizes became more compact
490 TT reduced from 530 → 515 mm
520 TT reduced from 540 → 530 mm

✅ Wheelbase shortened on smaller sizes
490: 993.7 → 977.2 mm
520: 990.7 → 978.5 mm

✅ Front-center reduced
Approximately 9–10 mm shorter on 490 and 520

✅ Stack slightly lower
Most sizes reduced by 3–4 mm

✅ Reach essentially unchanged

✅ Trail increased
490: 68.1 → 73 mm
520: 63.7 → 66.4 mm

✅ 540 remains the benchmark size
Geometry is almost identical between versions

ausmtb8989

Re: Lightcarbon LCR020 35c clearance aero frame
« Reply #91 on: July 13, 2026, 02:48:38 PM »
Looking forward to this one, much better value proposition than the VRT


Xtakayamax

Re: Lightcarbon LCR020 35c clearance aero frame
« Reply #93 on: July 13, 2026, 04:01:15 PM »
I'm thinking twice if I would just get this or the Yishun R033 mainly because of the weight...

Searching between all the other contenders, I decided to wait for the LC as it has more tire clearance, and the top of the headset looks more flush to the TT, stack is higher, and the wheelbase longer.
and try to save weight on other parts without sacrifice the handling characteristics that that geo offers.
the VRT also is very appealing to me but with the price difference makes the choice easier in my case.

Dark17

Re: Lightcarbon LCR020 35c clearance aero frame
« Reply #94 on: July 14, 2026, 02:10:57 AM »
Searching between all the other contenders, I decided to wait for the LC as it has more tire clearance, and the top of the headset looks more flush to the TT, stack is higher, and the wheelbase longer.
and try to save weight on other parts without sacrifice the handling characteristics that that geo offers.
the VRT also is very appealing to me but with the price difference makes the choice easier in my case.

Stack and tire clearance is also why I wanted to wait for this frame. XMCS and LCR020 is pretty much the same in terms of geometry but the price is what makes me steer towards LC. Only cons of this frame is the weight, but my current frame (Adapt DP-B02) is 1000 grams vs 1100 of size 540 of this frame.

Serge_K

Re: Lightcarbon LCR020 35c clearance aero frame
« Reply #95 on: July 14, 2026, 03:19:08 AM »
Stack and tire clearance is also why I wanted to wait for this frame. XMCS and LCR020 is pretty much the same in terms of geometry but the price is what makes me steer towards LC. Only cons of this frame is the weight, but my current frame (Adapt DP-B02) is 1000 grams vs 1100 of size 540 of this frame.

Not to be pedantic, but seat angle is 0.7 degree steeper (size 56) on the XMCS, making it more "modern" / better for the flat in aero tuck above the BB perched on your sit bones. Maybe you can compensate that with a zero offset seat post on the light carbon. But maybe you can also get 0 offset seat post on the XMCS if that's your thing, in which case, the geometry can't be the same. Beyond that, very similar indeed.
Whether that's worth 100g and the price difference, idk.

Note / edit: people mounting the GP5000 35C measure it to be at least 38mm, and can very easily measure 40mm (especially as you'd expect the tyre to stretch over time). People mounting GP5000 32C measure it to be routinely 34-35mm (which often fits just fine on 32C frames).
My current thinking: 35C frames are problematic: they often can't clear beyond 38mm measured, and 34-35mm measured tyres have been fitting just fine on lots of 32C frames for years (like mine). The only frame i can think of that's aero / road enough for my needs that could fit the 35C Conti gp5000 without stressing me out is the LC18D. As per LC, the LC20D will NOT fit these tyres (max 38mm measured tyres).
Xiamen, wir haben ein kleines Problem.
« Last Edit: July 14, 2026, 08:57:19 AM by Serge_K »

Bonus79

Re: Lightcarbon LCR020 35c clearance aero frame
« Reply #96 on: July 14, 2026, 03:38:53 AM »
Searching between all the other contenders, I decided to wait for the LC as it has more tire clearance, and the top of the headset looks more flush to the TT, stack is higher, and the wheelbase longer.
and try to save weight on other parts without sacrifice the handling characteristics that that geo offers.
the VRT also is very appealing to me but with the price difference makes the choice easier in my case.

I was also considering the LCR020-D and XMCS VRT... however, both feature a top tube with very little slope (seat tube 545/540mm in size L/56), and that is the only thing holding me back.

There is a significant price difference between the two frames... though it is worth noting that, for the same size, the VRT weighs at least 250g less (885g in size L)... but as someone else already mentioned, I’m not sure the weight difference alone justifies the higher price.

Below is a "rendering" of my ideal aero bike... basically an LCR020-D/VRT, but with more slope.

There is also the LCR018-D option, but despite its appearance, its geometry is closer to a gravel frame than an aero road frame... I’m concerned it might feel less responsive and less rewarding to ride.

Vasegaard

Re: Lightcarbon LCR020 35c clearance aero frame
« Reply #97 on: July 14, 2026, 04:09:34 AM »
If they would steepen the STA on larger sizes it would be so nice.

Dark17

Re: Lightcarbon LCR020 35c clearance aero frame
« Reply #98 on: July 14, 2026, 04:40:31 AM »
Not to be pedantic, but seat angle is 0.7 degree steeper (size 56) on the XMCS, making it more "modern" / better for the flat in aero tuck above the BB perched on your sit bones. Maybe you can compensate that with a zero offset seat post on the light carbon. But maybe you can also get 0 offset seat post on the XMCS if that's your thing, in which case, the geometry can't be the same. Beyond that, very similar indeed.
Whether that's worth 100g and the price difference, idk.

I would be in size 540 and I plan to get 0 offset anyway. The only thing that I am thinking of is the stem length if I would go with riser bars. Currently, I am in a 120mm length with 380mm width. Might add +10/20mm length just in case I go with riser bars...

glitch

Re: Lightcarbon LCR020 35c clearance aero frame
« Reply #99 on: July 14, 2026, 02:17:04 PM »
If they would steepen the STA on larger sizes it would be so nice.
..

Completely agree. Would have ordered already ift STA was steeper.

trek_rider

Re: Lightcarbon LCR020 35c clearance aero frame
« Reply #100 on: July 14, 2026, 05:02:28 PM »
Hi everyone. I'm torn between this frame and the LCR017; I know they are different frames with different weights and geometries. I'm 176 cm tall with an 80 cm inseam—would you recommend size 52 or size 54?
« Last Edit: July 15, 2026, 02:09:35 AM by trek_rider »

Dark17

Re: Lightcarbon LCR020 35c clearance aero frame
« Reply #101 on: July 15, 2026, 06:20:41 AM »
Hi everyone. I'm torn between this frame and the LCR017; I know they are different frames with different weights and geometries. I'm 176 cm tall with an 80 cm inseam—would you recommend size 52 or size 54?

It depends since 2 176cm guys are not the same. I am also 176cm but I am size 54. Base the size on your current bike

ATGNI

Re: Lightcarbon LCR020 35c clearance aero frame
« Reply #102 on: July 15, 2026, 09:17:40 AM »
Hi All, first post. Joined as I'm leaning more towards Chinese products and saw the LCR020-D in some YT videos and was taken by it.

I was, and still may, going for the XMCS VRT but the LCR020-D looks a good option.

I've emailed LC but not heard anything back. Does anybody have more up to date details on when the frames will be available for order?

Cheers.

tmhbrl

Re: Lightcarbon LCR020 35c clearance aero frame
« Reply #103 on: July 15, 2026, 09:51:54 AM »
Hi All, first post. Joined as I'm leaning more towards Chinese products and saw the LCR020-D in some YT videos and was taken by it.

I was, and still may, going for the XMCS VRT but the LCR020-D looks a good option.

I've emailed LC but not heard anything back. Does anybody have more up to date details on when the frames will be available for order?

Cheers.

I ordered (size 56, HBR20 130/380) end of June and made a 50% down payment.
Got the info that the frame takes 2-4 months...

Da11as

Re: Lightcarbon LCR020 35c clearance aero frame
« Reply #104 on: July 15, 2026, 10:48:52 AM »
I was also considering the LCR020-D and XMCS VRT... however, both feature a top tube with very little slope (seat tube 545/540mm in size L/56), and that is the only thing holding me back.

There is a significant price difference between the two frames... though it is worth noting that, for the same size, the VRT weighs at least 250g less (885g in size L)... but as someone else already mentioned, I’m not sure the weight difference alone justifies the higher price.

Below is a "rendering" of my ideal aero bike... basically an LCR020-D/VRT, but with more slope.

There is also the LCR018-D option, but despite its appearance, its geometry is closer to a gravel frame than an aero road frame... I’m concerned it might feel less responsive and less rewarding to ride.
Aero-ish bikes today have no sloping simply because it is more efficient to have horizontal TT, a free aero gain on the table. The way to increase seatpost exposure (and to reduce frontal area further) is to make front triangle lower i.e. smaller HT and lower TT, then you compensate reduced stack with mandatory riser bars such as on S5/Y1RS.

It is very seldom to see modern all-out aero bike with sloping.