Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Merry

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 9
1
Most people who have spent a lot of time working on progressive fit and the bike designs don't support the idea of a higher stack. Just look at the Ridley Noah Fast 3.0 and the Factor One. It's a half-truth popularized by influencers.

I would say that positions are more stack-sensitive because you really want to minimize the back angle and then drop the arms more or less straight down, or very slightly forward, then have your forearms parallel to the ground in the aero-hoods position. This is to manage triceps fatigue and lower the frontal area.

Can confirm this. The only modern trend that made a huge difference in my power output and comfort on the bike was shorter cranks, but that makes sense already cause I've got a shorter inseam. 170mm to 160mm cranks literally gave me at least +15W based off my training history - especially in Zone 2. My heart rate was lower for the same effort. I don't know the science behind it but it's clear that longer cranks were making me uncomfortable.

After the length, stack and reach change - I was able to do the aero-hoods position really comfortably, and I'm at the point now where I can hold it indefinitely.

2
I had a fitter who did just that, pretty much turned his back to me to look at his computer and only turned around to make changes to the bike that fit in the angles the computer wanted. I was on a bike where native stack/reach was already 560/390, he added an additional 45mm of spacers and put me on an 80mm stem, and saddle almost fully pushed back on the rails. I said its painful but didn't seem to matter.

I'm 5'9" or 175cm with an inseam of 32" or 81cm. I went to a new fitter and she did't look at numbers or angles a single time until I was in a comfort zone, now I'm on a QuickPro AR:One size small with a slammed 110mm -17 stem, and 25mm offset seatpost. So over 8cm difference in stack height between fits.

I struggle with the modern progressive fit because a higher stack loads my hands and wrists. With anterior pelvic tilt and a good amount of flexibility i need saddle to bar drop to be high to get hamstring and core engagement and unweight my wrists.  It seems the more forward I move the saddle the lower I need the handlebars to be.

This has been exactly my experience to a T as well. I'm of similar height and inseam (173cm 76.2cm inseam) and have actually gone with the AR:ONE too (to be built soon), coming from a CAAD10. I'm a guy with longer arms and torso than legs. So my bikes often don't have as much exposed seatpost, but has a lower front end to compensate for that.

Both run 20mm setback seatposts, slammed saddle forward (I found my favourite saddle to be the new Fizik Arione - I plan to buy another copy in the future for my CAAD, gonna poach that one for the new build) and 100mm stems (-7 and -8). CAAD10 is slammed with a 5mm headset cover but I may try getting lower with the AR:ONE since it has a lower stack. Ever since I got lower and got the saddle position in range, my back, hand and ass pain has COMPLETELY gone away on long rides.

4
Road Bike Frames, Wheels & Components / Re: Quick Pro AR:ONE Build
« on: August 13, 2026, 01:48:56 PM »
A few updates:

1. I like the Arione saddle a lot more than the Antares. I'll stick with it. With that, I also ordered the bar tape with it.
2. Wheels finally arrived. Attached some pics:

I'm glad I went with glossy 45mm depth, because the glossy coat over the raw carbon material matches so well with my frame. First impressions upon unboxing and inspecting it - I didn't find anything wrong with it. However, I will for sure update this thread on when I finally ride it and get some kilometres down. Anyways, I weighed it and it came out to be 1213g, which is just slightly higher than the advertised tolerance. After updating my spreadsheet and estimating, the build should come in at 7.25 kg ~ which is light enough for me.

It would be really easy though to get it down to 6.8 kg with just three changes: the ultegra crankset to a carbon crankset, going with dual 140mm rotors, 30mm to 28mm tires and changing the saddle to a carbon one. But that's $$$, plus I want the best braking and comfort possible to bomb descents lol. Tbh since I really like this saddle, maybe I'll upgrade to a 3d printed one next year... (It won't shave off much weight, but I'd be able to mount that saddle to my spare bike and try out 3D printed).

I'll continue to update the beginning post as I gather more parts.


5
Component Deals & Selection / Re: Chinese cycling clothes
« on: August 09, 2026, 12:51:54 PM »
I didn't even catch most of these for a while. I promise it looks good from a distance lol
Most chinese stuff is plagued with this garbage, but this one has such a perfect cut it will always be top of the pile regardless

Fair enough, a well fitting jersey / bib is worth its weight in gold. Gotta own it

6
Component Deals & Selection / Re: Chinese cycling clothes
« on: August 09, 2026, 02:10:25 AM »
This one from inbike is excellent. best fit jersey I own and it's not even close. IF you can look past the insanely cheesy slogans
https://aliexpress.com/item/1005012355782570.html

This one in particular though. I have another long sleeve summer from inbike (rabbit design) and the fit is awful. fabric is also worse

"Every Mile, Every Smile" lmaoooooo.

7
Electromagnetic trainers

Pros:
-Lighter
-Smoother overall pedaling resistance and power delivery
-Offers a better "kick" when sprinting
-Can be used without a power source
-Accurate, and can make micro adjustments of the resistance in the mobile app. I use this feature to match the 1-2% data discrepancy from the power meter on my bike.
-the R200 can be paired with it's in-house virtual shift remote control.

Cons:
-Quieter than a belt drive, but there is a constant "whining" noise. I run 2 fans anyway so I don't hear anything.
-At higher gradients ie: above 14% the drivetrain can feel super muddy if you aren't at a cadence of like 70 RPM or higher. This is the single most obvious advantage with a belt drive system. But I run my trainer difficulty in Zwift at 50% so I never run into this issue.

I don't have any plans to ever stop using Zwift. But something about being locked into the software with the latest Kickr Core 2 with the Zwift cog just to use its virtual gears, is unsettling.

Now I'm interested. I'm starting out with a dumb trainer for now, but how accurate is the power compared to say, 4IIII / Favero / Stages etc?

8
Road Bike Frames, Wheels & Components / Re: Spect Strada
« on: August 03, 2026, 10:46:33 PM »
OK so basically the update on XHS is, someone went to the Spect company registered address, found its an empty office.
I will not say anything more, just FYI
Just use Chrome translate or AI to translate the page.

70 【空力公式避雷  - 漏泪画莬 | 小红书 - 你的生活兴趣社区】 😆 8iNB1ICWqugKqyt 😆 https://www.xiaohongshu.com/discovery/item/6a70b7b6000000000502a56d?source=webshare&xhsshare=pc_web&xsec_token=ABd8V7mb9-vlS9U4Eqrx7AhsaOaL4GT54BF9h2ACNFzBs=&xsec_source=pc_share

Yikes! Good thing that I waited for more info on this frame before I dropped money.

9
Road Bike Frames, Wheels & Components / Re: Quick Pro AR:ONE Build
« on: August 02, 2026, 12:45:59 PM »
Ended up ordering the bar tape and saddle from Fizik. Here are my thoughts:

Initially, I wanted to grab a Chinese no-name saddle (I mean 120g is pretty hard to resist..) but then I had second thoughts on getting a saddle that was quite different than the one I liked already, the Antares. (Some of you might remember me asking around in the Chinese carbon saddles thread and I was searching for a comfortable saddle.. The search is annoying and I don't want to go through that again).

So I ended up ordering the Arione R5 just to give it a shot. If I don't like it then I'll go back to the Antares. But my thinking is that what I liked about the Antares was that it was slightly longer and had a mostly flat profile which allowed me to shift my fore-aft while riding. I tend to move around on the bike subconsciously depending on if I'm climbing, putting down power or in the aero hoods position.

Because of that I wanted to try the Arione, since it's even longer and has a flatter profile which hopefully will better accommodate my habits. I also run a somewhat aggressive position (long torso and monkey arms, anyone??) so it helps that it's slightly narrower (135mm wide).

I started with a short nose saddle (Elita One Specialized Power clone) but I ended up hating it because it chafed like hell, and I could NOT get the fore-aft dialed in. I'd say that my ass is pretty tolerant of the lack of padding in general, but shape definitely matters the most when it comes to saddles and the shape was just simply incompatible with my ass. And while it did work better if I forced myself to stay planted in one position at all times, it was always going to be a losing battle against my subconscious habits. I did notice though that the saddle supported me better if I was a bit more upright on the bike, but my bodily proportions demands otherwise.

This isn't to trash short nose saddles in general but rather highlight on how weird human bodies can be. Some bike fit trends of today involve running a zero offset seatpost, short nose saddle, shorter cranks or a few spacers to better accommodate aero positions. I tried all of them and aside the short crank change (which was magical to my comfort - overall improvements EVERYWHERE), I ended up running an offset seatpost, longer saddle and running a lower stack height. So I guess the takeaway is to go against the grain if you think it'll turn out better for you and listen to your body.

Anyways, here's hoping that it turns out well. I'm gonna give it a test ride on my CAAD while I wait for the other parts to arrive - the only thing though, is that it's a little bit heavier than the planned Chinese no-name saddle. But tbh, 100g is a minuscule price to pay in exchange for not having a sore ass.

10
Road Bike Frames, Wheels & Components / Quick Pro AR:ONE Build
« on: July 31, 2026, 03:22:34 PM »
Hello,

Starting a thread to document my build over the next two months (end of September to start of October for the completed build) and to replace that really old thread about the AR:ONE for discussion. I'm coming from a 2011 CAAD10 that I bought used just before the start of 25' that I've been riding the hell out of. So I'm pretty excited to see how my build will shape out, as I've received the frameset a few days ago and my wheelset shipped yesterday.

Background

I was pretty undecided between the ER:ONE and AR:ONE as they're in similar price categories. In the end though, what won me over was that the AR:ONE was said to emulate the feeling of super stiff rim brake bikes AND is aero enough, while being quite light for climbing. I'm about 173 cm tall and 57 kg, and so climbing is one of the most enjoyable things to me. The idea of having a really stiff and light bike to throw around appealed to me the most.

Build Plan and Costs

I live in Canada but I'm travelling to China in September for a bit over two weeks. So I plan to purchase the majority of my bicycle parts in the meantime while I'm there and have already researched costs, so I've got a pretty good rough estimate already. At the moment I've got the frameset & handlebars in, and the wheels have been shipped - I haven't received them yet, but they're from a smaller store.They're advertised as 1165g, but I'll post pictures of them when they arrive and inspect them in person.

Maybe I'll change the bar tape as it's not finalized yet, but I'll see. And in addition to this, I plan to run a waxed drivetrain so that it's clean and lasts longer.

All in all, I think the build will come out to be just 6.9 - 7.1 kg with mounts and pedals. We'll see but it'll be a big upgrade for sure.

Parts & Costs (CAD)

Frameset (includes headset and seatpost): AR:ONE - $2,713
Handlebars: Zephyr SSL - $286 (Includes computer mount).
Saddle: Fizik Vento Arione R5 - $136
Bottle Cages: No name Chinese carbon cages - $20

Bar Tape: Fizik Tacky 2mm - $48
Groupset (w/o crankset): Ultegra DI2 R8170 - $1130
Crankset Ultegra 160mm crankset: - N/A (already had them on my CAAD).
Disc Rotors with 140 - 160 adapter: IIIPro A2 160mm + 140mm - $32 (as a pair).

Bottom Bracket: BBR60 - $15

Wheelset: No Name 45mm Chinese Wheels - $600
TPU Tubes: Spades branded TPU tubes - N/A (Included with frameset order).
Tires: GP5000 30mm - $155 (as a pair).
Pedals: 105 R7000 - N/A (I plan to swap this to Favero Assiomas when they go on sale though in Nov).
Rear Light Mount: AR:ONE seatpost rear light mount for Wahoo - $6 (I want to install a Wahoo TRACKR radar).
Front Computer Mount: Niu Ju - $20 I will probably go with Niu Ju again, but not sure yet.

Total Cost Estimate
$5,158 CAD or 3,701 USD.

Attached a few pictures of the frameset. The frameset was really clean and I didn't see any issues. I think the build will go smooth, but this will be my first time setting up a disc brake bike, let alone a DI2 system. I've only built up my CAAD10 and have cut the fork on it already. Hopefully it goes well - I'll probably get my friend to help me and pay him a Costco pizza and a drink lol. Nothing like dragging your homies for 4 hours of unpaid labour and paying him with food and drinks.

11
Road Bike Frames, Wheels & Components / Re: Quick Pro ER:One
« on: July 28, 2026, 05:30:48 PM »
Would also be interested in hearing how to use a traditional stem/bar combo to test out stem length.

And i just cant decide whether i should go for an ER:One or wait for something with a higher stack (like Tavelo Arden) at the moment i got a canyon ultimate in S (390 Reach, 539 stack, 90mm stem) and i would like to have more reach and more stack…so i would need to have maybe some spacer plus riser cockpit on the Er:One due to its Stack being so low :/

Yes, you can install a traditional stem / bar combo. This goes for the AR:ONE as well because their steerer tubes are of standard size.

12
Just placed an order for these wheels from a store named "Carbon Riding Wheelset Store". Specs looked promising and after using Aliexpress and the store's coupons, I got it down to 600 CAD shipped.

https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005012659746703.html?spm=a2g0o.order_list.order_list_main.15.3d6f1802QLqo1K

Let's see how they turn out. I picked glossy 45mm wheels and should weigh 1165g ~ for the pair. This will be for my AR:ONE build which won't be done until the end of September.


13
Yeah agree that 2.9K is too much for a lesser known brand, let alone not having any sort of backing. I recently spent 1,850 USD on a QuickPro frame and I was debating between XMCS and Lightcarbon (with Quick Pro) purely because they all have presence in some form with after sales support, while being in similar price tiers. Not to mention, AFAIK both XMCS and Quick Pro wind tunnel test their bikes.

Based on the after sales support comments I'm reading here about Oak, plus the fact that 2K USD would be my maximum for a Chinese frame and doesn't have any sort of proven backing (eg. Quick Pro winning the junior world champs, XMCS being wind tunnel tested and LightCarbon having great reviews here) - this wouldn't be that appealing to me as a prospective consumer.

14
Maintenance, Mechanics, & Tools / Re: 12 speed quick links
« on: June 17, 2026, 08:51:26 PM »
any recommendations for cheap but good 12 speed quicklinks from AliExpress? The Shimano ones are a bit more expensive and I am not sure if they are fake or not. Then there are multiple other options from Risk, ztto and the likes.

Not 12S but 11S Riderace (they sell 12S). No issues, works perfectly fine on my HG701 chain.

15
After The Ride / Re: Was chinertown migrated to a potato server?
« on: May 20, 2026, 08:45:27 PM »
It was pretty bad there for a few days. Seems to be back to normal.

Still potato on my end

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 9