Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - MarioCanario

#1
Quote from: Dan S. on <strong>Today</strong> at 04:46:11 AMI guess you are not familiar with the straighforwardness of kubackje. Might sound a bit rude to you, but hey, it's also an opinion (no matter the informativeness) ;D If you get offended by it, I guess that's your problem.
sure. unless it is blatant mockery and insulting. and has nothing to do with the topic of the post at all
#2
Quote from: kubackje on October 27, 2026, 12:24:14 PMLol what a Frankenstein. This got to be one of the worst looking bikes I've seen.
What an unfriendly and useless comment
#3
Quote from: JensenMacD on October 23, 2026, 09:39:46 AMVideo came across my suggested, yes youtube knows me well.

LCR018 branded under Project Bikes

Sorry, but what a pile of nonsense.
#4
Quote from: Bonus79 on October 21, 2026, 08:43:11 AMThe one thing I didn't want to see... :(
the mold on insta looks alot like it ...
#5
Quote from: Dan S. on October 21, 2026, 08:08:48 AMJust check the geometry charts between X68, R099 and RF10, they are identical.
I would disagree with that. IMO, the R099 and RF10 are identical. TanTan has a different headset area. The "X68 New" fork is also very different in shape (looks sturdier and is heavier on paper).
#6
Quote from: Dan S. on October 21, 2026, 06:24:42 AMThey are the same, I can tell you that.
what makes you think that?
#7
i've been looking at the available "SL9 clone" options.

To me the RF10 and the Spcycle R099 seem identical. Even the tech. drawings published are the same. Since Daniel doesn't produce himself, i assume he sources from Shenzhen Disai Industrial Co., Ltd? I am not an expert on chinese production facilities and the ties btw. the various companies, but am i wrong on this? what do you think?
#8
Thanx for maintaining this resource of joy  8)
#9
Quote from: Vasegaard on October 16, 2026, 01:50:45 AM
I feel riser bars need a recessed headtube to look good
True that, recessed if there is much stem angle. Or mild raised bar profile like the Tavelo Rise or the HBR17.
But that light cycling riser bar doesn`t fit the RF10 at all
#11
What is the 'Finding Riders Program'?
#12
pics of the light cycling riser handlebar on fb.
#13
Quote from: ownthesky on October 08, 2026, 08:38:58 PM
I picked up a Cyclami X7 front light for winter commuting and I'm really liking it:
interesting. Are the given 2,5h @ 1000 lumens realistic?
i use a Ravemen FR1100 and at max. brightness i can't do more than ~90 minutes
#14
Quote from: DarthHyperion on October 13, 2026, 07:19:29 PM
Were you able to figure this out? Putting mine together with Shimano Di2 and I'm still scratching my head at this.
in the pics shown by Dave, the UDH adapter hasn't been fully inserted. You can wiggle the UDH adapter up and down till it is fully inserted. Tighten screw to 25 Nm (left turning). No grease on screw.
There also is a "SRAM Tech" video on YT showing how to procede
#15
Quote from: Sander2177 on October 12, 2026, 10:19:27 AM
In the end I ordered a set of Tavelo Rise bars in 380 × 120 mm.
way to go. i think this will look good on the RF10