Quote from: patliean1 on October 20, 2026, 09:30:19 AMIncoming...So can't wait to comparison this one to RF10, is there any ETA?![]()
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: patliean1 on October 20, 2026, 09:30:19 AMIncoming...So can't wait to comparison this one to RF10, is there any ETA?![]()
Quote from: BeR on September 23, 2026, 04:00:16 AM
Some pictures of a paint job.
Quote from: moewe on May 25, 2026, 06:22:59 AM
Well, I am 172cm, too - but with an 81,5cm inseam and quite happy with size 52.
Quote from: krroller on May 24, 2026, 01:02:05 PM
Ordered in mid-February and received in mid-May.
Size 50
Just got it put together with SRAM Force AXS XPLR (1x13) groupset, and using LightCarbon Rims NRD28-450C (28mm outer width (21mm inner width) w/ undulating 45- 50mm height) and 32mm Conti GP 5000 S TR tires.
Quote from: Sakizashi on May 24, 2026, 11:04:53 AM
The outdoor aero testing I do is not a gold standard type of anything and it's specific to me. However, the aero differences between bikes that you can notice IME come down to position. Being able to keep your front end narrow and stable, elbows tucked in is worth a lot of watts. Being able to get your back into the flattest position you can, likely worth a lot of watts.
That said, I cant tell you that you will be able to make use of the potential difference between the LCR018-D and the LTK266-D-SL. Nobody but a bike fitter can do that.
As someone who does take advantage of position differences (and the LTK is actually not aggressive enough for a pure road bike for me) the difference between my custom road bike and the LTK "test" bike is not that different than the difference between by custom road bike and an SL8 or a Dogma F12. Does that make the LTK fast? No, it means that the resolution of position and fit things like keeping my elbows tucked in drown out the impact of tube shapes.
If you just want a fun bike to ride, I would just buy whichever one you like the look of best. After all riding the bike is what matters.
Quote from: Sakizashi on May 22, 2026, 08:37:15 AM
This bike has race-bike geometry. The handling and body position are different.
For a rider capable of using this bike's geometry, the aero difference is huge compared to something like the LCR018 and would easily overshadow any frame aero benefits (i.e., wouldn't surprise me if it were 10x). Besides, neither this bike nor the Light Carbon has been aero tested, so no one knows which is more aero anyway.
Quote from: chubv on May 22, 2026, 12:40:03 PM
Finished my build last sunday.
Shimno 105Di2
Elitewheels ENT 38mm
Weight: 8.05kg (low weight was not a priority) without, pedals, mounts, bartape
Quote from: wietrzol on May 22, 2026, 11:39:34 AM
Wendy offers me c53db for 479$ + 120$ shipment to PL. Its not possibile to ship it together with the frame in one package.
Have you received your wheels already? If so, any thoughts?
Quote from: fallingdown on May 17, 2026, 04:22:33 PM
I went through this entire thread and I think I will be picking up this frame. I ride mostly gravel but would like a road bike for long long road rides, this frame ticks many boxes. I intend to use this as more of a endurance ride and not a slammed racer.
Going with size a L after comparing the numbers on with what i currently ride ( i measure 5.10 feet )
https://geometrygeeks.bike/compare/rodeo-labs-flaanimal-5-0-2020-56-cm,longteng-ltk266-d-sl-2025-l/ for anyone interested.
I was hoping to have anyone could chime in on M vs L sizing since i am kind of between.
Other take aways from reading:
1. Ditch the included headset and get a FSA N.55
2. Sugru for the holes
3. T47 85.5 internal
4. aprotobike for a seat post cover
5. possibly having to brake posts ?
6. as of 5/2026 I am expecting to cost 850-950 usd shipped
Anything else I should be aware of for a painless build?
Quote from: Sakizashi on May 20, 2026, 07:32:04 PM
First off--I don't own superlight wheels, though I have seen some of them in person, and ridden them
I want to be careful here as well, since a lot of this comes down to usage and preference, and I feel like Light Bicycle, Zen, DFS, and XMCS reps might call me out for these comments. It's my opinion that the H Works and similar hubs out there are not a higher-end product; they are more of a price-point product, and the ones designed to be lightweight are trading on stiffness and, ultimately, durability to achieve what they are doing. Rather than comparing these ultralight wheels to Roval or Enve, I feel like a more appropriate comparison would be to Extralite. What these companies have achieved is extraordinary--they have pushed the envelope for ultralight wheels and lead the market in that regard.
That said, you still need to take a step back and ask about the cost and if you were to make a wheel that was designed to stand up to race conditions, whether those are a cat 5 crit or a pro road race, if you would still design the same ultralight wheel. My observation about my wheels, which I believe are DFS XL rims on R3 Hubs, is that they are more flexible than I would like. Not in a way that is noticeable on the road, but clearly more flexible than my Roval or Ascent wheels. They did go out of true--something those wheels never do / did despite more mileage. Its my belief that for my use, the R2 hub would have been a better choice because of its geometry. With wheel stiffness resulting from multiple factors, including hub geometry, spoke count, and spoke type, it's generally hard to call out a specific property. However, between the R3 and R2 hubs, which have the same lacing pattern and spoke count, I believe I would have benefited from the R2 design's better bracing angle and more equal spoke tensions.
Compared to the 20/20 carbon spoke wheels I have seen, I believe my R3-based wheels are noticeably laterally stiffer, which would be going in the wrong direction, as I personally would prioritize stiffness and reliability over even 200g.
As for why I like the THR Industries Hubs, I think they are among the few (Chinese or not) that are comparable to the Enve Innerdrive, Vision PRS, and Roval Aero hubs in terms of helping build a high-performance wheel.
Quote from: Sakizashi on May 19, 2026, 10:53:11 AM
I tried to get some data on my "best guess" wheelset for aero/lightweight last year.
https://chinertown.com/index.php?topic=6243.0
These rims are available now in the SUXL layup if you want light rims. If I were to do it over again today, I would probably also get R2 hubs instead of R3 due to centerlock and higher flange heights, and get either CXRay or completely hidden nipple carbon spokes. Should be close to 1K or under depending on the options you go with.