Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - timjen

Pages: [1] 2
1
I wouldn't bother buying an more expensive (original) one, you will probably end up with the same challenge. I did use a vice to trim down material of the top-cap. No way otherwise it would fit.

Shaping the cap was the solution. The headset is doing his work now. Thank you so much

2
Did you use the expander plug that came with the frameset? You might need to make some adjustments to make it fit like I did. I didn't use any carbon paste, also no torque wrench.

Did you shape the expander top-cap a little? It sits really tight in the stem. Unfortunally I can‘t find any other D-Shape Expander here in Germany - Cervelo and/or Factor should fit, but seems to be very expansive and not available in aftermarket…

3
Finally I am working on my Chinerelo again. Everything is mounted and bleeded, but I can't set up the headset. The expander plug wents up everytime. How tight should the expander plug be? 7nm and montage paste didn't work so far.

4
Road Bike Frames, Wheels & Components / Re: VeloBuild VB-R-268 frame
« on: January 13, 2024, 02:08:14 AM »
I think getting SL7 is better choice than SL8 - it should be cheaper, no major difference between the frames and most importantly SL7 doesn't have the Buttsniffer™

I totally agree, but I am in the nice position to get a frame much cheaper because a friend of mine is working in the bike industry. Of course „cheap“ is the wrong word here. I am really unsure about my decision, but in the end I am trying to whitewash it with selling it later for nearly the price I will pay now…

I really like the shape of the 268, but the uncertainty of getting the roval cockpit work is a huge obstacle for my idea of building it up.

5
Road Bike Frames, Wheels & Components / Re: VeloBuild VB-R-268 frame
« on: December 26, 2023, 09:31:51 AM »
So, I am a bit confused about my selection Right now - money is Not the point, I am really struggling between a SL8 and this one here.
For me I have mixed emotions with a chinese frame - my TanTan X21 worked 10k more or less superb (just feeling a bit unsecure about 80km/h), but my newer Airwolf/Aspero frame has dozens of problems I don‘t want to face the next time.

So in case of this 268 what do you think about quality?

My other „problem“ will be mounting another stem or cockpit, which will not fit on velobuilds cap. A friend of mine is familiar with 3d prints, but where do I get those files?

Is the Stack measured with or without cap?

6
Road Bike Frames, Wheels & Components / Re: VeloBuild VB-R-268 frame
« on: December 19, 2023, 05:28:21 AM »
Is there any chance to get a sl7-stem or another handlebar/stem work on the top cap?

7
One question in between:
Did all of you receive a glossy bar/stem when ordered a glossy frame?

I had the problem that I got these items in glossy while the seatpost was matte...

8
I also vote for getting a new fork from Airwolf.

"This is really paint here. If there are carbon fiber cracks, I will repair a  fork"

--> This is the answer to my bid for a new fork...

Very satisfying :-)

9
They say it’s just the paint. But to be honest: this bike is ridden 300km. My TanTan Roadbike doesn‘t have a edge after 15.000km. The support tries it best to avoid it: but in my opionion this the point where warranty claim should be accepted - any Chance to get aliexpress or paypal involved?

10
Hello Gentlemen,

sorry for not posting for a long time - I think I started the discussion here about the frontend. But time flew so fast the last months (birth of 2nd child, job change, road racing, etc), that I did not ride much with my Chinarelo.
After all Airwolf sent a spacer for the lower headset bearing, which seemed a quite good solution. I rode nearly 300km with it in training and now wanted to change my bar to another one - so I disassembled the frontend once again and found a deep edge at my forktube.

I am a really big fan of chinese products, but my believe in good products got a huge bend - At the moment I believe this section will be a intended breaking point after more time with the bike so I am not going to ride this any more and will claim for warranty.

In my oppinion the edge is caused by the spacer and will cut deeper into the fork. What do you think about this?



11
If their idea is a spacer above the bearing I don‘t know how it should work. The ring has to be on the outer part of the bearing - if it is placed like this plastik ring here it doesn‘t have an effect because the spacer doesn‘t touch the frame.

Beneath the bearing it‘s the same the other way round…The spacer will lift the bearing to much and will bend or break.

12
It‘s 49.5…

13
Hi guys,

I am really thankful for all of your help and ideas - but in the end it's simple: The fork has an integrated crown, that's one point for not believing in a microspacer to lift the bearing. On the other side there is the frame/steerer tube, so there are angles, too.

The best (?) solution would be the exact same bearing with 1 - 1,5mm more depth, but unfortunally this size is a special one, I even can't find the original one over here in Germany.
 

14
So, here I am again - thanks for your thoughts.
It's really hard for me to discribe my problems in english, but I think you can see what I meant.
The upper and lower bearings are the same size - I think it is 49,5mm x 38,5mm x 6mm. So I ordered the only one that I could find with such a measurement about 49,5mm x 40mm x 7mm. The height might work, but because of the bigger innerring the bearing slips deeper on the fork, so that I have not one anything with this try. 49mm bearings are more common, but would it slip in the steerer tube?

Airwolf wrote today, that their mechanics think a microspace would work and they would send it to me soon. But again, I can't imagine where to place this because of the angles on the bearing and fork/frame. On the upper bearing placing a microspacer is no problem between Cap and ring...

15
I will send more tonight - but both bearings are the same size (not as shown). I tried a 49,5 / 40,5 / 7mm, but the 40,5 is too big.

Pages: [1] 2