Author Topic: LCFS947 - 160mm 4-bar 27+/29  (Read 84739 times)

FullCarbonAlchemist

Re: LCFS947 - 160mm 4-bar 27+/29
« Reply #210 on: February 03, 2022, 11:35:59 PM »
Look familiar?
https://www.pinkbike.com/news/sciu-launches-a-carbon-enduro-bike-with-ambitious-sustainability-goals.html

Interesting that they were able to get so much information on sustainability from the manufacturer (not sure if that’s actually LightCarbon?), and that the factory’s putting so much effort into it.
That would seem to be fairly unusual.

endo.alley

Re: LCFS947 - 160mm 4-bar 27+/29
« Reply #211 on: February 04, 2022, 09:18:01 AM »
Interesting that they were able to get so much information on sustainability from the manufacturer (not sure if that’s actually LightCarbon?), and that the factory’s putting so much effort into it.
That would seem to be fairly unusual.
Who is going to tell them they are lying even if incorrect?

Snacks

Re: LCFS947 - 160mm 4-bar 27+/29
« Reply #212 on: February 04, 2022, 09:42:16 AM »
"However, due to the pandemic, we have not yet been able to visit the production on-site - this is yet to happen."

I'm sure the factory told sciu what they wanted to hear and they in turn painted a nice rosey picture for pinkbike  ;D

endo.alley

Re: LCFS947 - 160mm 4-bar 27+/29
« Reply #213 on: February 04, 2022, 12:34:47 PM »
I would just be happy if they addressed the dropper post compatibility issue for the medium sized frame so that shorter riders can use this bike. It looks like a great frame design but for that fact.

Bajker

Re: LCFS947 - 160mm 4-bar 27+/29
« Reply #214 on: February 05, 2022, 03:00:18 PM »

slaine25600

Re: LCFS947 - 160mm 4-bar 27+/29
« Reply #215 on: February 07, 2022, 04:15:40 AM »
Interesting that they were able to get so much information on sustainability from the manufacturer (not sure if that’s actually LightCarbon?), and that the factory’s putting so much effort into it.
That would seem to be fairly unusual.

The connecting part between 2 triangles is made on one part and not with 2 parts linking by screw like light carbon frame design
perhaps it is better and it is possible to buy spare

riding_truckee

Re: LCFS947 - 160mm 4-bar 27+/29
« Reply #216 on: February 09, 2022, 10:44:00 PM »
[Edit: I sold the frame]

Hi,

I'm considering selling my LCFS947 (M, matte black), please message me, if interested.

I love this frame, but I also joined the AM831 group buy and the 2 frames are really quite similar.
In my opinion the 947 is stiffer and more robust (also does not have the triangle linkage problem).
I'm short and light (5'7", 144) and the 831 is a tad easier to manage in tight corners, that's why I settled on that (plus it came in a flashy baby-blue color :)

The frame is in very good condition ridden less than 300 miles, with few cosmetic scratches and no major crashes on it.
I have Fox Float DPS Evol shock on it, which I can also sell with the frame.
« Last Edit: March 02, 2022, 02:37:19 PM by riding_truckee »

JJJ

Re: LCFS947 - 160mm 4-bar 27+/29
« Reply #217 on: February 10, 2022, 02:34:37 AM »
I'm short and light (5'7", 144) and the 831 is a tad easier to manage in tight corners, that's why I settled on that (plus it came in a flashy baby-blue color :)

What makes you say the 831 is easier to manage? Did you try an 831 in the same conditions? The chainstays are about the same length, just 2 mm less for the 831 (would that make the difference?).

riding_truckee

Re: LCFS947 - 160mm 4-bar 27+/29
« Reply #218 on: February 10, 2022, 09:54:55 AM »
What makes you say the 831 is easier to manage? Did you try an 831 in the same conditions? The chainstays are about the same length, just 2 mm less for the 831 (would that make the difference?).

Hard to say: yes I did ride both in the same trail/condition, but my fitness level could have been different.
I only noticed a small difference, if any.
I also thought that the 947 climbed a little better, but again not sure why.

.. as I was writing this, I just remember that I was initially running a 5mm longer stem in the 947, which could account for both.

endo.alley

Re: LCFS947 - 160mm 4-bar 27+/29
« Reply #219 on: February 12, 2022, 11:14:54 AM »
Hi,

I'm considering selling my LCFS947 (M, matte black), please message me, if interested.

I love this frame, but I also joined the AM831 group buy and the 2 frames are really quite similar.
In my opinion the 947 is stiffer and more robust (also does not have the triangle linkage problem).
I'm short and light (5'7", 144) and the 831 is a tad easier to manage in tight corners, that's why I settled on that (plus it came in a flashy baby-blue color :)

The frame is in very good condition ridden less than 300 miles, with few cosmetic scratches and no major crashes on it.
I have Fox Float DPS Evol shock on it, which I can also sell with the frame.
At 5'7" in height what was the longest dropper post you could use with the 947? That is my issue only with this frame.

riding_truckee

Re: LCFS947 - 160mm 4-bar 27+/29
« Reply #220 on: February 12, 2022, 05:21:45 PM »
At 5'7" in height what was the longest dropper post you could use with the 947? That is my issue only with this frame.

I use a 150mm One Up V2, but when I stick it all the way down, which is necessary for my height, the bend in the sit tube pushes the cable to the side, making it unreliable.

To fix this, I unscrewed the actuator cup by half a turn (and added threadlock). This this moved the position of the cable towards the front of the bike, clearing the tube bend. Note: the One Up cable exit is out-of-center (see https://s14761.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/One-up-V2-dropper-actuator-001.jpg).

I don't know if the cable exit is always in the same position relatively to the sit clamp... if not, some of the posts might be fine out of the box.

CasualRider

Re: LCFS947 - 160mm 4-bar 27+/29
« Reply #221 on: February 14, 2022, 12:27:49 AM »
I'm 5'7", using a 125mm dropper. I'm not one of those that require the post to be flushed with the seat collar, as long as my butt can get out of the way, it's good enough.


**edit

Just to add that, the dropper does stick out from the seat collar a bit but so far I have not had any issues with the cabling or actuation.

So it really depends if you're ok with that kind of setup, I also use it to indicate if I'm too low or too far back behind the saddle. With a long travel 29er it's just too easy for me to buzz my butt on the tyres.
« Last Edit: February 14, 2022, 02:10:58 AM by CasualRider »

Remedy 7

Re: LCFS947 - 160mm 4-bar 27+/29
« Reply #222 on: March 12, 2022, 05:03:33 PM »
Just received the frame purchased from user riding_truckee. I’ve been obsessing over this frame for months and happy to have it in the flesh. It’s not as large as you’d guess based on the sizing. The seat post insert depth is shallow as mentioned. I’m using a 1UP 150mm inserted as far as it’ll let me. Up front is a 170mm Yari (2019). My front wheel is currently stuck on another bike with a rounded off thru axle so I cannot sit on the bike yet. I’ll be changing out the stock headset for something more robust as well.

Pictures

https://imgur.com/a/5tCad1G

Bennykyu

Re: LCFS947 - 160mm 4-bar 27+/29
« Reply #223 on: March 14, 2022, 07:57:19 AM »
hi all, just want to double confirm before i push the button,
is below invoice same as what you receive before purchasing the frame?

Remedy 7

Re: LCFS947 - 160mm 4-bar 27+/29
« Reply #224 on: March 14, 2022, 08:41:20 AM »
hi all, just want to double confirm before i push the button,
is below invoice same as what you receive before purchasing the frame?

Yup looks good.